Cited by 141Virus-based gene therapy researchRetinal Development and DisordersRNA Interference and Gene Delivery

AAV8-vectored suprachoroidal gene transfer produces widespread ocular transgene expression

Open access
Ding, Kun, Shen, Jikui, Hafiz, Zibran, Hackett, Sean F., Silva, Raquel Lima e, Khan, Mahmood, Lorenc, Valeria E., Chen, Daiqin +7 more·2019·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

There has been great progress in ocular gene therapy, but delivery of viral vectors to the retinal pigmented epithelium (RPE) and retina can be challenging. Subretinal injection, the preferred route of delivery for most applications, requires a surgical procedure that has risks. Herein we report a novel gene therapy delivery approach, suprachoroidal injection of AAV8 vectors, which is less invasive and could be done in an outpatient setting. Two weeks after suprachoroidal injection of AAV8.GFP in rats, GFP fluorescence covered 18.9% of RPE flat mounts and extended entirely around sagittal and transverse sections in RPE and photoreceptors. After 2 suprachoroidal injections of AAV8.GFP, GFP fluorescence covered 30.5% of RPE flat mounts. Similarly, widespread expression of GFP occurred in nonhuman primate and pig eyes after suprachoroidal injection of AAV8.GFP. Compared with subretinal injection in rats of RGX-314, an AAV8 vector expressing an anti-VEGF Fab, suprachoroidal injection of the same dose of RGX-314 resulted in similar expression of anti-VEGF Fab and similar suppression of VEGF-induced vascular leakage. Suprachoroidal AAV8 vector injection provides a noninvasive outpatient procedure to obtain widespread transgene expression in retina and RPE.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci129085

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Two studies involving non-human primates showed conflicting results in the efficacy of photoreceptor cell uptake via the suprachoroidal route.

    “Two studies involving NHPs showed conflicting results in the efficacy of photoreceptor cell uptake.78,101”

    From Ocular Gene Therapy: A Literature Review with Special Focus on Immune and Inflammatory Responses (2022) · cites this paper as [101]

    In the section on suprachoroidal AAV8.GFP injection in nonhuman primates and pigs (page not supplied), the paper reports GFP expression in retinal flat mounts from three rhesus monkeys, so it supports identifying this as one NHP study of suprachoroidal gene transfer. The monkey results do not specifically identify photoreceptor uptake, and this paper alone does not establish that two NHP studies had conflicting results. (LLM, conf=0.82)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • There are inconsistent reports about the efficacy of the suprachoroidal route in infecting photoreceptors.

    “There are inconsistent reports about its efficacy in infecting photoreceptors.”

    From Ocular Gene Therapy: A Literature Review with Special Focus on Immune and Inflammatory Responses (2022) · cites this paper as [101]

    The paper’s comparative-studies discussion reports strong photoreceptor transduction after suprachoroidal AAV8 and AAV9 injection but poor transduction with AAV2. That supports variation in efficacy, not the claim that published reports are inconsistent; the passage describes the authors’ own serotype comparison (page not available in our copy). (LLM, conf=0.80)

    Experimental — accuracy not yet measured
  • Studies on animals other than non-human primates showed that the suprachoroidal route can be used effectively to infect photoreceptors.

    “Studies on animals other than NHPs showed that the suprachoroidal route can be used effectively to infect photoreceptors.95,101”
  • Data in rat, pig, and NHP suggest plausibility of transduction of both RPE and PRs via suprachoroidal AAV gene delivery, although results have been inconsistent across studies.

    “Data in rat, pig, and NHP suggest plausibility of transduction of both RPE and PRs via suprachoroidal AAV gene delivery, although results have been inconsistent across studies.116, 117, 118”
  • Subconjunctival injection often utilize AAV8 and AAV6 for gene delivery, and AAV8 is considered a reliable choice for suprachoroidal injections.

    “Subconjunctival injection often utilize AAV8 and AAV6 for gene delivery67, and AAV8 is considered a reliable choice for suprachoroidal injections33,68,69.”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [9]9. Patel SR, Berezovsky DE, McCarey BE, Zarnitsyn V, Edelhauser HF, Prausnitz MR. Targeted administration into the suprachoroidal space using a microneedle for drug delivery to the pos- terior segment of the eye. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2012;53(8):4433-4441.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ding, K., Shen, J., Hafiz, Z., Hackett, S. F., Silva, R. L. E., Khan, M., Lorenc, V. E., Chen, D., Chadha, R., Zhang, M., Van Everen, S., Buss, N., Fiscella, M., Danos, O., & Campochiaro, P. A.
Affiliations
  • Johns Hopkins University (US)
  • Regenxbio (United States) (US)
Corresponding author
Campochiaro, Peter A.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2019-10-07
Volume
129
Issue
11
Pages
4901-4911
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2967160972
Cited by
141
References
37
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 18 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 21 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 29 · 2020: 19
FWCI
9.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Conicet (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-sa)
Funders
  • REGENXBIO, Inc (None)
  • Alsheler-Durell Foundation (none)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Retinal Development and Disorders
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › RNA Interference and Gene Delivery
Keywords
suprachoroidal injection, AAV8 vector, ocular gene therapy, retinal pigment epithelium, transgene expression, subretinal injection, photoreceptors, non-human primates, pigs
MeSH terms
Dependovirus, Animals, Genetic Vectors, Macaca mulatta, Transduction, Genetic, Gene Expression, Transgenes, Green Fluorescent Proteins, Retinal Pigment Epithelium

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review