Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 213

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Antagonistic antibody prevents toll-like receptor 2–driven lethal shock-like syndromes

Open access
Meng, Guangxun, Rutz, Mark, Schiemann, Matthias, Metzger, Jochen, Grabiec, Alina, Schwandner, Ralf, Luppa, Peter B., Ebel, Frank, Busch, Dirk H., Bauer, Stefan, Wagner, Hermann, Kirschning, Carsten J.·2004·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Hyperactivation of immune cells by bacterial products through toll-like receptors (TLRs) is thought of as a causative mechanism of septic shock pathology. Infections with Gram-negative or Gram-positive bacteria provide TLR2-specific agonists and are the major cause of severe sepsis. In order to intervene in TLR2-driven toxemia, we raised mAb's against the extracellular domain of TLR2. Surface plasmon resonance analysis showed direct and specific interaction of TLR2 and immunostimulatory lipopeptide, which was blocked by T2.5 in a dose-dependent manner. Application of mAb T2.5 inhibited cell activation in experimental murine models of infection. T2.5 also antagonized TLR2-specific activation of primary human macrophages. TLR2 surface expression by murine macrophages was surprisingly weak, while both intra- and extracellular expression increased upon systemic microbial challenge. Systemic application of T2.5 upon lipopeptide challenge inhibited release of inflammatory mediators such as TNF-alpha and prevented lethal shock-like syndrome in mice. Twenty milligrams per kilogram of T2.5 was sufficient to protect mice, and administration of 40 mg/kg of T2.5 was protective even 3 hours after the start of otherwise lethal challenge with Bacillus subtilis. These results indicate that epitope-specific binding of exogenous ligands precedes specific TLR signaling and suggest therapeutic application of a neutralizing anti-TLR2 antibody in acute infection.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci200420762

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 6 references

Cited by

See all 213

Metadata

Authors
Meng, G., Rutz, M., Schiemann, M., Metzger, J., Grabiec, A., Schwandner, R., Luppa, P. B., Ebel, F., Busch, D. H., Bauer, S., Wagner, H., & Kirschning, C. J.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2004-05-15
Volume
113
Issue
10
Pages
1473-1481
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2158500759
Cited by
213
References
6
FWCI
6.23
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Antagonistic antibody prevents toll-like receptor 2–driven lethal shock-like syndromes. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci200420762
The paper
Meng, G., Rutz, M., Schiemann, M., Metzger, J., Grabiec, A., Schwandner, R., Luppa, P. B., Ebel, F., Busch, D. H., Bauer, S., Wagner, H., & Kirschning, C. J. (2004). Antagonistic antibody prevents toll-like receptor 2–driven lethal shock-like syndromes. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci200420762

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.