Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 335

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 12 of the 12 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Valsartan lowers brain β-amyloid protein levels and improves spatial learning in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease

Open access
Wang, Jun, Ho, Lap, Chen, Linghong, Zhao, Zhong, Zhao, Wei, Qian, Xianjuan, Humala, Nelson, Seror, Ilana, Bartholomew, Sadie, Rosendorff, Clive, Pasinetti, Giulio Maria·2007·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Recent epidemiological evidence suggests that some antihypertensive medications may reduce the risk for Alzheimer disease (AD). We screened 55 clinically prescribed antihypertensive medications for AD-modifying activity using primary cortico-hippocampal neuron cultures generated from the Tg2576 AD mouse model. These agents represent all drug classes used for hypertension pharmacotherapy. We identified 7 candidate antihypertensive agents that significantly reduced AD-type beta-amyloid protein (Abeta) accumulation. Through in vitro studies, we found that only 1 of the candidate drugs, valsartan, was capable of attenuating oligomerization of Abeta peptides into high-molecular-weight (HMW) oligomeric peptides, known to be involved in cognitive deterioration. We found that preventive treatment of Tg2576 mice with valsartan significantly reduced AD-type neuropathology and the content of soluble HMW extracellular oligomeric Abeta peptides in the brain. Most importantly, valsartan administration also attenuated the development of Abeta-mediated cognitive deterioration, even when delivered at a dose about 2-fold lower than that used for hypertension treatment in humans. These preclinical studies suggest that certain antihypertensive drugs may have AD-modifying activity and may protect against progressive Abeta-related memory deficits in subjects with AD or in those at high risk of developing AD.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci31547

Cites

12 of 12 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

1 retracted

Show all 12 references

Cited by

See all 335

Metadata

Authors
Wang, J., Ho, L., Chen, L., Zhao, Z., Zhao, W., Qian, X., Humala, N., Seror, I., Bartholomew, S., Rosendorff, C., & Pasinetti, G. M.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2007-11-01
Volume
117
Issue
11
Pages
3393-3402
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1995817686
Cited by
335
References
12
FWCI
10.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Valsartan lowers brain β-amyloid protein levels and improves spatial learning in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci31547
The paper
Wang, J., Ho, L., Chen, L., Zhao, Z., Zhao, W., Qian, X., Humala, N., Seror, I., Bartholomew, S., Rosendorff, C., & Pasinetti, G. M. (2007). Valsartan lowers brain β-amyloid protein levels and improves spatial learning in a mouse model of Alzheimer disease. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci31547

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.