Cited by 571Virus-based gene therapy researchCRISPR and Genetic EngineeringCAR-T cell therapy research

The genotoxic potential of retroviral vectors is strongly modulated by vector design and integration site selection in a mouse model of HSC gene therapy

Open access
Montini, Eugenio, Cesana, Daniela, Schmidt, Manfred, Sanvito, Francesca, Bartholomae, Cynthia C., Ranzani, Marco, Benedicenti, Fabrizio, Sergi, Lucia Sergi +6 more·2009·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

gamma-Retroviral vectors (gammaRVs), which are commonly used in gene therapy, can trigger oncogenesis by insertional mutagenesis. Here, we have dissected the contribution of vector design and viral integration site selection (ISS) to oncogenesis using an in vivo genotoxicity assay based on transplantation of vector-transduced tumor-prone mouse hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells. By swapping genetic elements between gammaRV and lentiviral vectors (LVs), we have demonstrated that transcriptionally active long terminal repeats (LTRs) are major determinants of genotoxicity even when reconstituted in LVs and that self-inactivating (SIN) LTRs enhance the safety of gammaRVs. By comparing the genotoxicity of vectors with matched active LTRs, we were able to determine that substantially greater LV integration loads are required to approach the same oncogenic risk as gammaRVs. This difference in facilitating oncogenesis is likely to be explained by the observed preferential targeting of cancer genes by gammaRVs. This integration-site bias was intrinsic to gammaRVs, as it was also observed for SIN gammaRVs that lacked genotoxicity in our model. Our findings strongly support the use of SIN viral vector platforms and show that ISS can substantially modulate genotoxicity.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci37630

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • SIN lentiviral vectors have a lower risk of insertional oncogenesis than gammaretroviral vectors in side-by-side comparisons of model systems.

    “SIN lentiviral vectors were shown to have a lower risk of insertional oncogenesis than gammaretroviral vectors in side-by-side comparisons of model systems [56, 57],”

    From Clinical use of lentiviral vectors (2018) · cites this paper as [56]

  • By swapping regions of retroviral and lentiviral LTRs, lentiviral vectors can induce insertional mutagenesis when bearing the strong promoter/enhancer elements from retroviruses.

    “Montini et al. [56] demonstrated that by swapping regions of retroviral and lentiviral LTRs, lentiviral vectors can induce insertional mutagenesis when bearing the strong promoter/enhancer elements from retroviruses.”

    From Clinical use of lentiviral vectors (2018) · cites this paper as [56]

  • Integration of proviral DNA can disrupt or enhance expression of host genes, resulting in altered and sometimes fatal outcomes.

    “Equally consequential is the integration of the proviral DNA for the host, since it can either disrupt or enhance the expression of the host genes, resulting in altered and sometimes even fatal outcomes (Hacein-Bey-Abina et al. 2003, Bushman 2007, Montini et al. 2009, Desfarges and Ciuffi 2012).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Montini, E., Cesana, D., Schmidt, M., Sanvito, F., Bartholomae, C. C., Ranzani, M., Benedicenti, F., Sergi, L. S., Ambrosi, A., Ponzoni, M., Doglioni, C., Di Serio, C., von Kalle, C., & Naldini, L.
Affiliations
  • The San Raffaele Telethon Institute for Gene Therapy (IT)
  • Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT)
  • German Cancer Research Center (DE)
  • Fondazione Telethon (IT)
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2009-04-01
Volume
119
Issue
4
Pages
964-975
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2061645642
Cited by
571
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 17 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 28 · 2020: 31 · 2019: 25 · 2018: 17 · 2017: 30 · 2016: 30 · 2015: 29 · 2014: 33 · 2013: 58 · 2012: 55
FWCI
39.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Clinical Investigation (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Archivio Istituzionale della Ricerca - Università Vita-Salute San Raffaele (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • European Commission
  • Fondazione Telethon
  • Associazione Italiana per la Ricerca sul Cancro
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (P01HL053750)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Virus-based gene therapy research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › CRISPR and Genetic Engineering
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Oncology › CAR-T cell therapy research
Keywords
gammaretroviral vectors, genotoxicity, insertional mutagenesis, carcinogenesis, long terminal repeat, self-inactivating vectors, lentiviral vectors, hematopoietic stem cell gene therapy, vector design
MeSH terms
Animals, Base Sequence, Genetic Vectors, Mice, Transgenic, Mutation, Neoplasms, Experimental, Genetic Therapy, Lentivirus, DNA Primers, Gammaretrovirus, Mice, Knockout, Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplantation, Cyclin-Dependent Kinase Inhibitor p16, Genes, p16, Terminal Repeat Sequences, Mice

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review