Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

P2Y2 and Gq/G11 control blood pressure by mediating endothelial mechanotransduction

Open access
Wang, ShengPeng, Iring, András, Strilic, Boris, Albarrán Juárez, Julián, Kaur, Harmandeep, Troidl, Kerstin, Tonack, Sarah, Burbiel, Joachim C., Müller, Christa E., Fleming, Ingrid, Lundberg, Jon O., Wettschureck, Nina, Offermanns, Stefan·2015·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Elevated blood pressure is a key risk factor for developing cardiovascular diseases. Blood pressure is largely determined by vasodilatory mediators, such as nitric oxide (NO), that are released from the endothelium in response to fluid shear stress exerted by the flowing blood. Previous work has identified several mechanotransduction signaling processes that are involved in fluid shear stress-induced endothelial effects, but how fluid shear stress initiates the response is poorly understood. Here, we evaluated human and bovine endothelial cells and found that the purinergic receptor P2Y2 and the G proteins Gq/G11 mediate fluid shear stress-induced endothelial responses, including [Ca2+]i transients, activation of the endothelial NO synthase (eNOS), phosphorylation of PECAM-1 and VEGFR-2, as well as activation of SRC and AKT. In response to fluid shear stress, endothelial cells released ATP, which activates the purinergic P2Y2 receptor. Mice with induced endothelium-specific P2Y2 or Gq/G11 deficiency lacked flow-induced vasodilation and developed hypertension that was accompanied by reduced eNOS activation. Together, our data identify P2Y2 and Gq/G11 as a critical endothelial mechanosignaling pathway that is upstream of previously described mechanotransduction processes and demonstrate that P2Y2 and Gq/G11 are required for basal endothelial NO formation, vascular tone, and blood pressure.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci81067

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 5 references

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Wang, S., Iring, A., Strilic, B., Albarrán Juárez, J., Kaur, H., Troidl, K., Tonack, S., Burbiel, J. C., Müller, C. E., Fleming, I., Lundberg, J. O., Wettschureck, N., & Offermanns, S.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2015-07-13
Volume
125
Issue
8
Pages
3077-3086
ISSN
0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W1914868353
Cited by
202
References
5
FWCI
10.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: P2Y2 and Gq/G11 control blood pressure by mediating endothelial mechanotransduction. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci81067
The paper
Wang, S., Iring, A., Strilic, B., Albarrán Juárez, J., Kaur, H., Troidl, K., Tonack, S., Burbiel, J. C., Müller, C. E., Fleming, I., Lundberg, J. O., Wettschureck, N., & Offermanns, S. (2015). P2Y2 and Gq/G11 control blood pressure by mediating endothelial mechanotransduction. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci81067

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.