Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 554

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 75 of the 75 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Lung-resident eosinophils represent a distinct regulatory eosinophil subset

Open access
Mesnil, Claire, Raulier, Stéfanie, Paulissen, Geneviève, Xiao, Xue, Birrell, Mark A., Pirottin, Dimitri, Janss, Thibaut, Starkl, Philipp, Ramery, Eve, Henket, Monique, Schleich, Florence N., Radermecker, Marc, Thielemans, Kris, Gillet, Laurent, Thiry, Marc, Belvisi, Maria G., Louis, Renaud, Desmet, Christophe, Marichal, Thomas, Bureau, Fabrice·2016·Journal of Clinical Investigation

Abstract

Increases in eosinophil numbers are associated with infection and allergic diseases, including asthma, but there is also evidence that eosinophils contribute to homeostatic immune processes. In mice, the normal lung contains resident eosinophils (rEos), but their function has not been characterized. Here, we have reported that steady-state pulmonary rEos are IL-5-independent parenchymal Siglec-FintCD62L+CD101lo cells with a ring-shaped nucleus. During house dust mite-induced airway allergy, rEos features remained unchanged, and rEos were accompanied by recruited inflammatory eosinophils (iEos), which were defined as IL-5-dependent peribronchial Siglec-FhiCD62L-CD101hi cells with a segmented nucleus. Gene expression analyses revealed a more regulatory profile for rEos than for iEos, and correspondingly, mice lacking lung rEos showed an increase in Th2 cell responses to inhaled allergens. Such elevation of Th2 responses was linked to the ability of rEos, but not iEos, to inhibit the maturation, and therefore the pro-Th2 function, of allergen-loaded DCs. Finally, we determined that the parenchymal rEos found in nonasthmatic human lungs (Siglec-8+CD62L+IL-3Rlo cells) were phenotypically distinct from the iEos isolated from the sputa of eosinophilic asthmatic patients (Siglec-8+CD62LloIL-3Rhi cells), suggesting that our findings in mice are relevant to humans. In conclusion, our data define lung rEos as a distinct eosinophil subset with key homeostatic functions.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1172/jci85664

Cites

75 of 75 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 75 references

Cited by

See all 554

Metadata

Authors
Mesnil, C., Raulier, S., Paulissen, G., Xiao, X., Birrell, M. A., Pirottin, D., Janss, T., Starkl, P., Ramery, E., Henket, M., Schleich, F. N., Radermecker, M., Thielemans, K., Gillet, L., Thiry, M., Belvisi, M. G., Louis, R., Desmet, C., Marichal, T., & Bureau, F.
Venue
Journal of Clinical Investigation
Published
2016-08-22
Volume
126
Issue
9
Pages
3279-3295
ISSN
  • 0021-9738 (ISSN-L)
  • 1558-8238
OpenAlex
W2511267861
Cited by
554
References
75
FWCI
23.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Lung-resident eosinophils represent a distinct regulatory eosinophil subset. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1172/jci85664
The paper
Mesnil, C., Raulier, S., Paulissen, G., Xiao, X., Birrell, M. A., Pirottin, D., Janss, T., Starkl, P., Ramery, E., Henket, M., Schleich, F. N., Radermecker, M., Thielemans, K., Gillet, L., Thiry, M., Belvisi, M. G., Louis, R., Desmet, C., Marichal, T., & Bureau, F. (2016). Lung-resident eosinophils represent a distinct regulatory eosinophil subset. Journal of Clinical Investigation. https://doi.org/10.1172/jci85664

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.