The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Addressing Interdependency in a Multimodel Ensemble by Interpolation of Model Properties
Open accessAbstract
The diverse set of Earth system models used to conduct the CMIP5 ensemble can partly sample the uncertainties in future climate projections. However, combining those projections is complicated by the fact that models developed by different groups share ideas and code and therefore biases. The authors propose a method for combining model results into single or multivariate distributions that are more robust to the inclusion of models with a large degree of interdependency. This study uses a multivariate metric of present-day climatology to assess both model performance and similarity in two recent model intercomparisons, CMIP3 and CMIP5. Model characteristics can be interpolated and then resampled in a space defined by independent climate properties. A form of weighting can be applied by sampling more densely in the region of the space close to the projected observations, thus taking into account both model performance and interdependence. The choice of the sampling distribution’s parameters is a subjective decision that should reflect the researcher’s prior assumptions as to the acceptability of different model errors.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The use of the multi-model ensemble in probabilistic climate projections
Tebaldi, C., & Knutti, R. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2076 · Cited by 1,862
Self-citationClimate model genealogy: Generation CMIP5 and how we got there
Knutti, R., Masson, D., & Gettelman, A. (2013) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/grl.50256 · Cited by 918
Self-citationShould we believe model predictions of future climate change?
Knutti, R. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2008.0169 · Cited by 279
Self-citationStatistical significance of climate sensitivity predictors obtained by data mining
Caldwell, P. M., Bretherton, C. S., Zelinka, M. D., Klein, S. A., Santer, B. D., & Sanderson, B. M. (2014) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1002/2014gl059205 · Cited by 153
Self-citation
Cited by
Taking climate model evaluation to the next level
Eyring, V., Cox, P. M., Flato, G. M., Gleckler, P. J., Abramowitz, G., Caldwell, P., Collins, W. D., Gier, B. K., Hall, A. D., Hoffman, F. M., et al. (2019) · Nature Climate Change · doi:10.1038/s41558-018-0355-y · Cited by 748
Self-citationAmplification of future energy demand growth due to climate change
van Ruijven, B. J., De Cian, E., & Sue Wing, I. (2019) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-019-10399-3 · Cited by 648
Metadata
- Authors
- Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R., & Caldwell, P.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2015-07-01
- Volume
- 28
- Issue
- 13
- Pages
- 5150-5170
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2090895725
- Cited by
- 183
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.21
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Addressing Interdependency in a Multimodel Ensemble by Interpolation of Model Properties. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00361.1
- The paper
- Sanderson, B. M., Knutti, R., & Caldwell, P. (2015). Addressing Interdependency in a Multimodel Ensemble by Interpolation of Model Properties. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli-d-14-00361.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.