The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Prediction Models for Annual U.S. Hurricane Counts
Open accessAbstract
The authors build on their efforts to understand and predict coastal hurricane activity by developing statistical seasonal forecast models that can be used operationally. The modeling strategy uses May–June averaged values representing the North Atlantic Oscillation (NAO), the Southern Oscillation index (SOI), and the Atlantic multidecadal oscillation to predict the probabilities of observing U.S. hurricanes in the months ahead (July–November). The models are developed using a Bayesian approach and make use of data that extend back to 1851 with the earlier hurricane counts (prior to 1899) treated as less certain relative to the later counts. Out-of-sample hindcast skill is assessed using the mean-squared prediction error within a hold-one-out cross-validation exercise. Skill levels are compared to climatology. Predictions show skill above climatology, especially using the NAO + SOI and the NAO-only models. When the springtime NAO values are below normal, there is a heightened risk of U.S. hurricane activity relative to climatology. The preliminary NAO value for 2005 is −0.565 standard deviations so the NAO-only model predicts a 13% increase over climatology of observing three or more U.S. hurricanes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Sampling-based approaches to calculating marginal densities
Gelfand, A. E., & Smith, A. F. M. (1990) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.1080/01621459.1990.10476213 · Cited by 6,606
The Recent Increase in Atlantic Hurricane Activity: Causes and Implications
Goldenberg, S. B., Landsea, C. W., Mestas-Nuñez, A. M., & Gray, W. M. (2001) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1060040 · Cited by 1,769
Cited by
Heightened tropical cyclone activity in the North Atlantic: natural variability or climate trend?
Holland, G. J., & Webster, P. J. (2007) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences · doi:10.1098/rsta.2007.2083 · Cited by 304
A More General Framework for Understanding Atlantic Hurricane Variability and Trends
Kossin, J. P., & Vimont, D. J. (2007) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-88-11-1767 · Cited by 277
Metadata
- Authors
- Elsner, J. B., & Jagger, T. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-06-15
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2935-2952
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2167916130
- Cited by
- 165
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 7.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Prediction Models for Annual U.S. Hurricane Counts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jcli3729.1
- The paper
- Elsner, J. B., & Jagger, T. H. (2006). Prediction Models for Annual U.S. Hurricane Counts. Journal of Climate. https://doi.org/10.1175/jcli3729.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.