The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recent Climatology, Variability, and Trends in Global Surface Humidity
Open accessAbstract
In situ observations of surface air and dewpoint temperatures and air pressure from over 15 000 weather stations and from ships are used to calculate surface specific (q) and relative (RH) humidity over the globe (60°S–75°N) from December 1975 to spring 2005. Seasonal and interannual variations and linear trends are analyzed in relation to observed surface temperature (T) changes and simulated changes by a coupled climate model [namely the Parallel Climate Model (PCM)] with realistic forcing. It is found that spatial patterns of long-term mean q are largely controlled by climatological surface temperature, with the largest q of 17–19 g kg−1 in the Tropics and large seasonal variations over northern mid- and high-latitude land. Surface RH has relatively small spatial and interannual variations, with a mean value of 75%–80% over most oceans in all seasons and 70%–80% over most land areas except for deserts and high terrain, where RH is 30%–60%. Nighttime mean RH is 2%–15% higher than daytime RH over most land areas because of large diurnal temperature variations. The leading EOFs in both q and RH depict long-term trends, while the second EOF of q is related to the El Niño–Southern Oscillation (ENSO). During 1976–2004, global changes in surface RH are small (within 0.6% for absolute values), although decreasing trends of −0.11% ∼ −0.22% decade−1 for global oceans are statistically significant. Large RH increases (0.5%–2.0% decade−1) occurred over the central and eastern United States, India, and western China, resulting from large q increases coupled with moderate warming and increases in low clouds over these regions during 1976–2004. Statistically very significant increasing trends are found in global and Northern Hemispheric q and T. From 1976 to 2004, annual q (T) increased by 0.06 g kg−1 (0.16°C) decade−1 globally and 0.08 g kg−1 (0.20°C) decade−1 in the Northern Hemisphere, while the Southern Hemispheric q trend is positive but statistically insignificant. Over land, the q and T trends are larger at night than during the day. The largest percentage increases in surface q (∼1.5% to 6.0% decade−1) occurred over Eurasia where large warming (∼0.2° to 0.7°C decade−1) was observed. The q and T trends are found in all seasons over much of Eurasia (largest in boreal winter) and the Atlantic Ocean. Significant correlation between annual q and T is found over most oceans (r = 0.6–0.9) and most of Eurasia (r = 0.4–0.8), whereas it is insignificant over subtropical land areas. RH–T correlation is weak over most of the globe but is negative over many arid areas. The q–T anomaly relationship is approximately linear so that surface q over the globe, global land, and ocean increases by ∼4.9%, 4.3%, and 5.7% per 1°C warming, respectively, values that are close to those suggested by the Clausius–Clapeyron equation with a constant RH. The recent q and T trends and the q–T relationship are broadly captured by the PCM; however, the model overestimates volcanic cooling and the trends in the Southern Hemisphere.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Plant responses to rising vapor pressure deficit
Grossiord, C., Buckley, T. N., Cernusak, L. A., Novick, K. A., Poulter, B., Siegwolf, R. T. W., Sperry, J. S., & McDowell, N. G. (2020) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.16485 · Cited by 2,302
Increased atmospheric vapor pressure deficit reduces global vegetation growth
Yuan, W., Zheng, Y., Piao, S., Ciais, P., Lombardozzi, D., Wang, Y., Ryu, Y., Chen, G., Dong, W., Hu, Z., et al. (2019) · Science Advances · doi:10.1126/sciadv.aax1396 · Cited by 1,762
Wang, K., & Dickinson, R. E. (2012) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1029/2011rg000373 · Cited by 1,504
Spatial variation of the rain–snow temperature threshold across the Northern Hemisphere
Jennings, K. S., Winchell, T. S., Livneh, B., & Molotch, N. P. (2018) · Nature Communications · doi:10.1038/s41467-018-03629-7 · Cited by 444
Walsh, J., Wuebbles, D., Hayhoe, K., Kossin, J., Kunkel, K., Stephens, G., Thorne, P., Vose, R., Wehner, M., Willis, J., et al. (2014) · doi:10.7930/j0kw5cxt · Cited by 423
O’Gorman, P. A., & Muller, C. J. (2010) · Environmental Research Letters · doi:10.1088/1748-9326/5/2/025207 · Cited by 326
Zhao, T., & Dai, A. (2015) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-14-00363.1 · Cited by 314
Self-citationChallenges in Quantifying Changes in the Global Water Cycle
Hegerl, G. C., Black, E., Allan, R. P., Ingram, W. J., Polson, D., Trenberth, K. E., Chadwick, R. S., Arkin, P. A., Sarojini, B. B., Becker, A., et al. (2015) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-13-00212.1 · Cited by 313
Self-citationVihma, T., Screen, J., Tjernström, M., Newton, B., Zhang, X., Popova, V., Deser, C., Holland, M., & Prowse, T. (2016) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Biogeosciences · doi:10.1002/2015jg003132 · Cited by 309
The expanding tropics: a critical assessment of the observational and modeling studies
Lucas, C., Timbal, B., & Nguyen, H. (2014) · WIREs Climate Change · doi:10.1002/wcc.251 · Cited by 258
Wulfmeyer, V., Hardesty, R. M., Turner, D. D., Behrendt, A., Cadeddu, M. P., Di Girolamo, P., Schlüssel, P., Van Baelen, J., & Zus, F. (2015) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000476 · Cited by 258
Temperature and pressure dependence of the rain‐snow phase transition over land and ocean
Dai, A. (2008) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2008gl033295 · Cited by 257
Self-citationPrytherch, J., Kent, E. C., Fangohr, S., & Berry, D. I. (2015) · International Journal of Climatology · doi:10.1002/joc.4150 · Cited by 14
Metadata
- Authors
- Dai, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2006-08-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 15
- Pages
- 3589-3606
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2002627299
- Cited by
- 504
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.