The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Simulations of Arctic Temperature and Pressure by Global Coupled Models
Abstract
Simulations of Arctic surface air temperature and sea level pressure by 14 global climate models used in the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change are synthesized in an analysis of biases and trends. Simulated composite GCM surface air temperatures for 1981–2000 are generally 1°–2°C colder than corresponding observations with the exception of a cold bias maximum of 6°–8°C in the Barents Sea. The Barents Sea bias, most prominent in winter and spring, occurs in 12 of the 14 GCMs and corresponds to a region of oversimulated sea ice. All models project a twenty-first-century warming that is largest in the autumn and winter, although the rates of the projected warming vary considerably among the models. The across-model and across-scenario uncertainties in the projected temperatures are comparable through the first half of the twenty-first century, but increases in variability associated with the choice of scenario begin to outpace increases in across-model variability by about the year 2070. By the end of the twenty-first century, the cross-scenario variability is about 50% greater than the across-model variability. The biases of sea level pressure are smaller than in the previous generation of global climate models, although the models still show a positive bias of sea level pressure in the Eurasian sector of the Arctic Ocean, surrounded by an area of negative pressure biases. This bias is consistent with an inability of the North Atlantic storm track to penetrate the Eurasian portion of the Arctic Ocean. The changes of sea level pressure projected for the twenty-first century are negative over essentially the entire Arctic. The most significant decreases of pressure are projected for the Bering Strait region, primarily in autumn and winter.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
The CNRM-CM5.1 global climate model: description and basic evaluation
Voldoire, A., Sanchez-Gomez, E., Salas y Mélia, D., Decharme, B., Cassou, C., Sénési, S., Valcke, S., Beau, I., Alias, A., Chevallier, M., et al. (2013) · Climate Dynamics · doi:10.1007/s00382-011-1259-y · Cited by 1,366
A sea ice free summer Arctic within 30 years?
Wang, M., & Overland, J. E. (2009) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2009gl037820 · Cited by 699
Vertical structure of recent Arctic warming
Graversen, R. G., Mauritsen, T., Tjernström, M., Källén, E., & Svensson, G. (2008) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature06502 · Cited by 600
Large-scale atmospheric circulation changes are associated with the recent loss of Arctic sea ice
Overland, J. E., & Wang, M. (2010) · Tellus A: Dynamic Meteorology and Oceanography · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0870.2009.00421.x · Cited by 594
THE ROLE OF THE BARENTS SEA IN THE ARCTIC CLIMATE SYSTEM
Smedsrud, L. H., Esau, I., Ingvaldsen, R. B., Eldevik, T., Haugan, P. M., Li, C., Lien, V. S., Olsen, A., Omar, A. M., Otterå, O. H., et al. (2013) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/rog.20017 · Cited by 489
Simulation of Present-Day and Future Permafrost and Seasonally Frozen Ground Conditions in CCSM4
Lawrence, D. M., Slater, A. G., & Swenson, S. C. (2012) · Journal of Climate · doi:10.1175/jcli-d-11-00334.1 · Cited by 278
Brock, C. A., Cozic, J., Bahreini, R., Froyd, K. D., Middlebrook, A. M., McComiskey, A., Brioude, J., Cooper, O. R., Stohl, A., Aikin, K. C., et al. (2011) · Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics · doi:10.5194/acp-11-2423-2011 · Cited by 251
Metadata
- Authors
- Chapman, W. L., & Walsh, J. E.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2007-02-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 609-632
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2035969786
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 16.81
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.