The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Sensitivity of Australian Rainfall to Inter–El Niño Variations
Abstract
Australia typically experiences drought during El Niño, especially across the eastern two-thirds of the continent during austral spring (September–November). There have, however, been some interesting departures from this paradigm. For instance, the near-record-strength El Niño of 1997 was associated with near-normal rainfall. In contrast, eastern Australia experienced near-record drought during the modest El Niño of 2002. This stark contrast raises the issue of how the magnitude of the drought is related to the character and magnitude of El Niño, for instance as measured by the broadscale sea surface temperature (SST) anomaly in the equatorial eastern Pacific. Internal (unpredictable) atmospheric noise is one plausible explanation for this contrasting behavior during these El Niño events. Here, the authors suggest that Australian rainfall is sensitive to the zonal distribution of SST anomalies during El Niño and, in particular, the greatest sensitivity is to the SST variations on the eastern edge of the Pacific warm pool rather than in the eastern Pacific where El Niño variations are typically largest. Positive SST anomalies maximized near the date line in 2002, but in 1997 maximum anomalies were shifted well into the eastern Pacific, where their influence on Australian rainfall appears to be less. These findings provide a plausible physical basis for the view that forecasting the strength of El Niño is not sufficient to accurately predict rainfall variations across Australia during El Niño.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Some simple solutions for heat‐induced tropical circulation
Gill, A. E. (1980) · Quarterly Journal of the Royal Meteorological Society · doi:10.1002/qj.49710644905 · Cited by 4,394
Cited by
Yeh, S.-W., Kug, J.-S., Dewitte, B., Kwon, M.-H., Kirtman, B. P., & Jin, F.-F. (2009) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature08316 · Cited by 1,592
Capotondi, A., Wittenberg, A. T., Newman, M., Di Lorenzo, E., Yu, J.-Y., Braconnot, P., Cole, J., Dewitte, B., Giese, B., Guilyardi, E., et al. (2015) · Bulletin of the American Meteorological Society · doi:10.1175/bams-d-13-00117.1 · Cited by 1,073
The crucial role of plant mitochondria in orchestrating drought tolerance
Atkin, O. K., & Macherel, D. (2009) · Annals of Botany · doi:10.1093/aob/mcn094 · Cited by 489
El Niño and its relationship to changing background conditions in the tropical Pacific Ocean
McPhaden, M. J., Lee, T., & McClurg, D. (2011) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2011gl048275 · Cited by 403
Johnston, F., Hanigan, I., Henderson, S., Morgan, G., & Bowman, D. (2011) · Environmental Research · doi:10.1016/j.envres.2011.05.007 · Cited by 294
Metadata
- Authors
- Wang, G., & Hendon, H. H.
- Venue
- Journal of Climate
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2007-08-15
- Volume
- 20
- Issue
- 16
- Pages
- 4211-4226
- ISSN
- 0894-8755 (ISSN-L)
- 1520-0442
- OpenAlex
- W2107489669
- Cited by
- 273
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 9.64
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.