Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 159

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

A Deep Neural Network Modeling Framework to Reduce Bias in Satellite Precipitation Products

Tao, Yumeng, Gao, Xiaogang, Hsu, Kuolin, Sorooshian, Soroosh, Ihler, Alexander·2016·Journal of Hydrometeorology

Abstract

Despite the advantage of global coverage at high spatiotemporal resolutions, satellite remotely sensed precipitation estimates still suffer from insufficient accuracy that needs to be improved for weather, climate, and hydrologic applications. This paper presents a framework of a deep neural network (DNN) that improves the accuracy of satellite precipitation products, focusing on reducing the bias and false alarms. The state-of-the-art deep learning techniques developed in the area of machine learning specialize in extracting structural information from a massive amount of image data, which fits nicely into the task of retrieving precipitation data from satellite cloud images. Stacked denoising autoencoder (SDAE), a widely used DNN, is applied to perform bias correction of satellite precipitation products. A case study is conducted on the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS) with spatial resolution of 0.08° × 0.08° over the central United States, where SDAE is used to process satellite cloud imagery to extract information over a window of 15 × 15 pixels. In the study, the summer of 2012 (June–August) and the winter of 2012/13 (December–February) serve as the training periods, while the same seasons of the following year (summer of 2013 and winter of 2013/14) are used for validation purposes. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology outside the study area, three more regions are selected for additional validation. Significant improvements are achieved in both rain/no-rain (R/NR) detection and precipitation rate quantification: the results make 33% and 43% corrections on false alarm pixels and 98% and 78% bias reductions in precipitation rates over the validation periods of the summer and winter seasons, respectively.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1175/jhm-d-15-0075.1

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Research works printed but not linked: 28

  1. AghaKouchak, 2011, Geometrical characterization of precipitation patterns, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 274, 10.1175/2010JHM1298.1 · doi:10.1175/2010jhm1298.1
  2. Behrangi, 2009, PERSIANN-MSA: A Precipitation Estimation Method from Satellite-Based Multispectral Analysis, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 1414, 10.1175/2009JHM1139.1 · DOI
  3. Bellerby, 2005, Probabilistic and ensemble representations of the uncertainty in an IR/microwave satellite precipitation product, J. Hydrometeor., 6, 1032, 10.1175/JHM454.1 · DOI
  4. Bengio, 2009, Learning deep architectures for AI, Found. Trends Mach. Learn., 2, 1, 10.1561/2200000006 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Bourlard, 1988, Auto-association by multilayer perceptrons and singular value decomposition, Biol. Cybern., 59, 291, 10.1007/BF00332918 · DOI · Paper page
  6. Boushaki, 2009, Bias adjustment of satellite precipitation estimation using ground-based measurement: A case study evaluation over the southwestern United States, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 1231, 10.1175/2009JHM1099.1 · doi:10.1175/2009jhm1099.1
  7. Hinton, 2006, A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, Neural Comput., 18, 1527, 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Hong, 2004, Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Imagery Using an Artificial Neural Network Cloud Classification System, J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 1834, 10.1175/JAM2173.1 · DOI · Paper page
  9. Hong, 2007, Evaluation of PERSIANN-CCS rainfall measurement using the NAME Event Rain Gauge Network, J. Hydrometeor., 8, 469, 10.1175/JHM574.1 · DOI · Paper page
  10. Hsu, 1997, Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks, J. Appl. Meteor., 36, 1176, 10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1176:PEFRSI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Huffman, 2007, The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales, J. Hydrometeor., 8, 38, 10.1175/JHM560.1 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Joyce, 2004, CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution, J. Hydrometeor., 5, 487, 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
  13. Kidd, 2003, Satellite rainfall estimation using combined passive microwave and infrared algorithms, J. Hydrometeor., 4, 1088, 10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1088:SREUCP>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1088:sreucp>2.0.co;2
  14. Kuligowski, 2002, A self-calibrating real-time GOES rainfall algorithm for short-term rainfall estimates, J. Hydrometeor., 3, 112, 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0112:ASCRTG>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0112:ascrtg>2.0.co;2
  15. Li, 2007, Comparison between current and future environmental satellite imagers on cloud classification using MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 108, 311, 10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.023 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.023
  16. Lu, 2013, Speech enhancement based on deep denoising autoencoder, 10.21437/Interspeech.2013-130 · DOI · Paper page
  17. Marzano, 2004, Multivariate statistical integration of satellite infrared and microwave radiometric measurements for rainfall retrieval at the geostationary scale, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 42, 1018, 10.1109/TGRS.2003.820312 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2003.820312
  18. McCollum, 2002, Evaluation of biases of satellite rainfall estimation algorithms over the continental United States, J. Appl. Meteor., 41, 1065, 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<1065:EOBOSR>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<1065:eobosr>2.0.co;2
  19. Moazami, 2014, Uncertainty analysis of bias from satellite rainfall estimates using copula method, Atmos. Res., 137, 145, 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.016 · DOI
  20. Nasrollahi, 2013, An Artificial Neural Network model to reduce false alarms in satellite precipitation products using MODIS and CloudSat observations, J. Hydrometeor., 14, 1872, 10.1175/JHM-D-12-0172.1 · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-12-0172.1
  21. Sapiano, 2009, An intercomparison and validation of high-resolution satellite precipitation estimates with 3-hourly gauge data, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 149, 10.1175/2008JHM1052.1 · DOI · Paper page
  22. Sorooshian, 2011, Advanced concepts on remote sensing of precipitation at multiple scales, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1353, 10.1175/2011BAMS3158.1 · doi:10.1175/2011bams3158.1
  23. Tian, 2009, Component analysis of errors in satellite-based precipitation estimates, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D24101, 10.1029/2009JD011949 · DOI · Paper page
  24. Turk, 2005, Toward improved characterization of remotely sensed precipitation regimes with MODIS/AMSR-E blended data techniques, IEEE T Geosci. Remote Sens., 43, 1059, 10.1109/TGRS.2004.841627 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.841627
  25. Vincent, 2008, 1096, 10.1145/1390156.1390294 · DOI · Paper page
  26. Vincent, 2010, Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 11, 3371
  27. Zhang, C., B.Shahbaba, and H.Zhao, 2015: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo acceleration using neural network surrogate functions. ArXiv, accessed 28 January 2016. [Available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05555.] · arXiv
  28. Zhou, 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res.

Cited by

See all 159

Metadata

Authors
Tao, Y., Gao, X., Hsu, K., Sorooshian, S., & Ihler, A.
Venue
Journal of Hydrometeorology
Published
2016-03-01
Volume
17
Issue
3
Pages
931-945
ISSN
  • 1525-7541 (ISSN-L)
  • 1525-755X
OpenAlex
W2232647241
Cited by
159
References
2
FWCI
6.24
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Deep Neural Network Modeling Framework to Reduce Bias in Satellite Precipitation Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jhm-d-15-0075.1
The paper
Tao, Y., Gao, X., Hsu, K., Sorooshian, S., & Ihler, A. (2016). A Deep Neural Network Modeling Framework to Reduce Bias in Satellite Precipitation Products. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-15-0075.1

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.