The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
A Deep Neural Network Modeling Framework to Reduce Bias in Satellite Precipitation Products
Abstract
Despite the advantage of global coverage at high spatiotemporal resolutions, satellite remotely sensed precipitation estimates still suffer from insufficient accuracy that needs to be improved for weather, climate, and hydrologic applications. This paper presents a framework of a deep neural network (DNN) that improves the accuracy of satellite precipitation products, focusing on reducing the bias and false alarms. The state-of-the-art deep learning techniques developed in the area of machine learning specialize in extracting structural information from a massive amount of image data, which fits nicely into the task of retrieving precipitation data from satellite cloud images. Stacked denoising autoencoder (SDAE), a widely used DNN, is applied to perform bias correction of satellite precipitation products. A case study is conducted on the Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks Cloud Classification System (PERSIANN-CCS) with spatial resolution of 0.08° × 0.08° over the central United States, where SDAE is used to process satellite cloud imagery to extract information over a window of 15 × 15 pixels. In the study, the summer of 2012 (June–August) and the winter of 2012/13 (December–February) serve as the training periods, while the same seasons of the following year (summer of 2013 and winter of 2013/14) are used for validation purposes. To demonstrate the effectiveness of the methodology outside the study area, three more regions are selected for additional validation. Significant improvements are achieved in both rain/no-rain (R/NR) detection and precipitation rate quantification: the results make 33% and 43% corrections on false alarm pixels and 98% and 78% bias reductions in precipitation rates over the validation periods of the summer and winter seasons, respectively.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Learning representations by back-propagating errors
Rumelhart, D. E., Hinton, G. E., & Williams, R. J. (1986) · Nature · doi:10.1038/323533a0 · Cited by 31,892
Greedy layer-wise training of deep networks
Bengio, Y., Lamblin, P., Popovici, D., & Larochelle, H. (2007) · Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems 19 · doi:10.7551/mitpress/7503.003.0024 · Cited by 4,841
Research works printed but not linked: 28
- AghaKouchak, 2011, Geometrical characterization of precipitation patterns, J. Hydrometeor., 12, 274, 10.1175/2010JHM1298.1 · doi:10.1175/2010jhm1298.1
- Behrangi, 2009, PERSIANN-MSA: A Precipitation Estimation Method from Satellite-Based Multispectral Analysis, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 1414, 10.1175/2009JHM1139.1 · DOI
- Bellerby, 2005, Probabilistic and ensemble representations of the uncertainty in an IR/microwave satellite precipitation product, J. Hydrometeor., 6, 1032, 10.1175/JHM454.1 · DOI
- Bengio, 2009, Learning deep architectures for AI, Found. Trends Mach. Learn., 2, 1, 10.1561/2200000006 · DOI · Paper page
- Bourlard, 1988, Auto-association by multilayer perceptrons and singular value decomposition, Biol. Cybern., 59, 291, 10.1007/BF00332918 · DOI · Paper page
- Boushaki, 2009, Bias adjustment of satellite precipitation estimation using ground-based measurement: A case study evaluation over the southwestern United States, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 1231, 10.1175/2009JHM1099.1 · doi:10.1175/2009jhm1099.1
- Hinton, 2006, A fast learning algorithm for deep belief nets, Neural Comput., 18, 1527, 10.1162/neco.2006.18.7.1527 · DOI · Paper page
- Hong, 2004, Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Imagery Using an Artificial Neural Network Cloud Classification System, J. Appl. Meteor., 43, 1834, 10.1175/JAM2173.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Hong, 2007, Evaluation of PERSIANN-CCS rainfall measurement using the NAME Event Rain Gauge Network, J. Hydrometeor., 8, 469, 10.1175/JHM574.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Hsu, 1997, Precipitation Estimation from Remotely Sensed Information Using Artificial Neural Networks, J. Appl. Meteor., 36, 1176, 10.1175/1520-0450(1997)036<1176:PEFRSI>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Huffman, 2007, The TRMM Multisatellite Precipitation Analysis (TMPA): Quasi-global, multiyear, combined-sensor precipitation estimates at fine scales, J. Hydrometeor., 8, 38, 10.1175/JHM560.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Joyce, 2004, CMORPH: A method that produces global precipitation estimates from passive microwave and infrared data at high spatial and temporal resolution, J. Hydrometeor., 5, 487, 10.1175/1525-7541(2004)005<0487:CAMTPG>2.0.CO;2 · DOI · Paper page
- Kidd, 2003, Satellite rainfall estimation using combined passive microwave and infrared algorithms, J. Hydrometeor., 4, 1088, 10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1088:SREUCP>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2003)004<1088:sreucp>2.0.co;2
- Kuligowski, 2002, A self-calibrating real-time GOES rainfall algorithm for short-term rainfall estimates, J. Hydrometeor., 3, 112, 10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0112:ASCRTG>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1525-7541(2002)003<0112:ascrtg>2.0.co;2
- Li, 2007, Comparison between current and future environmental satellite imagers on cloud classification using MODIS, Remote Sens. Environ., 108, 311, 10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.023 · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2006.11.023
- Lu, 2013, Speech enhancement based on deep denoising autoencoder, 10.21437/Interspeech.2013-130 · DOI · Paper page
- Marzano, 2004, Multivariate statistical integration of satellite infrared and microwave radiometric measurements for rainfall retrieval at the geostationary scale, IEEE Trans. Geosci. Remote Sens., 42, 1018, 10.1109/TGRS.2003.820312 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2003.820312
- McCollum, 2002, Evaluation of biases of satellite rainfall estimation algorithms over the continental United States, J. Appl. Meteor., 41, 1065, 10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<1065:EOBOSR>2.0.CO;2 · doi:10.1175/1520-0450(2002)041<1065:eobosr>2.0.co;2
- Moazami, 2014, Uncertainty analysis of bias from satellite rainfall estimates using copula method, Atmos. Res., 137, 145, 10.1016/j.atmosres.2013.08.016 · DOI
- Nasrollahi, 2013, An Artificial Neural Network model to reduce false alarms in satellite precipitation products using MODIS and CloudSat observations, J. Hydrometeor., 14, 1872, 10.1175/JHM-D-12-0172.1 · doi:10.1175/jhm-d-12-0172.1
- Sapiano, 2009, An intercomparison and validation of high-resolution satellite precipitation estimates with 3-hourly gauge data, J. Hydrometeor., 10, 149, 10.1175/2008JHM1052.1 · DOI · Paper page
- Sorooshian, 2011, Advanced concepts on remote sensing of precipitation at multiple scales, Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 92, 1353, 10.1175/2011BAMS3158.1 · doi:10.1175/2011bams3158.1
- Tian, 2009, Component analysis of errors in satellite-based precipitation estimates, J. Geophys. Res., 114, D24101, 10.1029/2009JD011949 · DOI · Paper page
- Turk, 2005, Toward improved characterization of remotely sensed precipitation regimes with MODIS/AMSR-E blended data techniques, IEEE T Geosci. Remote Sens., 43, 1059, 10.1109/TGRS.2004.841627 · doi:10.1109/tgrs.2004.841627
- Vincent, 2008, 1096, 10.1145/1390156.1390294 · DOI · Paper page
- Vincent, 2010, Stacked denoising autoencoders: Learning useful representations in a deep network with a local denoising criterion, J. Mach. Learn. Res., 11, 3371
- Zhang, C., B.Shahbaba, and H.Zhao, 2015: Hamiltonian Monte Carlo acceleration using neural network surrogate functions. ArXiv, accessed 28 January 2016. [Available online at http://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05555.] · arXiv
- Zhou, 2012, J. Mach. Learn. Res.
Cited by
Deep learning in remote sensing applications: A meta-analysis and review
Ma, L., Liu, Y., Zhang, X., Ye, Y., Yin, G., & Johnson, B. A. (2019) · ISPRS Journal of Photogrammetry and Remote Sensing · doi:10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2019.04.015 · Cited by 2,456
Rainfall–runoff modelling using Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) networks
(2018) · doi:10.5194/hess-22-6005-2018 · Cited by 2,114
Deep learning in environmental remote sensing: Achievements and challenges
Yuan, Q., Shen, H., Li, T., Li, Z., Li, S., Jiang, Y., Xu, H., Tan, W., Yang, Q., Wang, J., et al. (2020) · Remote Sensing of Environment · doi:10.1016/j.rse.2020.111716 · Cited by 1,697
Could Machine Learning Break the Convection Parameterization Deadlock?
Gentine, P., Pritchard, M., Rasp, S., Reinaudi, G., & Yacalis, G. (2018) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2018gl078202 · Cited by 497
Improving Atmospheric River Forecasts With Machine Learning
Chapman, W. E., Subramanian, A. C., Delle Monache, L., Xie, S. P., & Ralph, F. M. (2019) · Geophysical Research Letters · doi:10.1029/2019gl083662 · Cited by 96
Metadata
- Authors
- Tao, Y., Gao, X., Hsu, K., Sorooshian, S., & Ihler, A.
- Venue
- Journal of Hydrometeorology
- Publisher
- American Meteorological Society
- Published
- 2016-03-01
- Volume
- 17
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 931-945
- ISSN
- 1525-7541 (ISSN-L)
- 1525-755X
- OpenAlex
- W2232647241
- Cited by
- 159
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 6.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A Deep Neural Network Modeling Framework to Reduce Bias in Satellite Precipitation Products. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1175/jhm-d-15-0075.1
- The paper
- Tao, Y., Gao, X., Hsu, K., Sorooshian, S., & Ihler, A. (2016). A Deep Neural Network Modeling Framework to Reduce Bias in Satellite Precipitation Products. Journal of Hydrometeorology. https://doi.org/10.1175/jhm-d-15-0075.1
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.