The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Clinical and research implications of the diagnosis of dysphoric or mixed mania or hypomania
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The authors reviewed available evidence regarding the status of dysphoric or mixed mania as a distinct clinical state and formulated operational criteria for its diagnosis. METHOD: Studies of dysphoric mania or hypomania in patients with bipolar disorder were analyzed with regard to clinical characteristics, prevalence, demographic features, course of illness, outcome, family history, associated conditions, biological tests, and response to biological treatment. RESULTS: Although some studies suggest that dysphoric and nondysphoric mania are similar conditions, others suggest that, compared with nondysphoric mania, dysphoric mania may be more severe; more likely to occur in women; more likely to be associated with suicidality, a younger age at onset, a longer duration of illness, higher rates of personal and familial depression, concomitant alcohol or sedative-hypnotic abuse, neuropsychiatric abnormalities, and poorer outcome; more frequently associated with cortisol nonsuppression; and less likely to respond adequately to lithium but perhaps more likely to respond to ECT or anticonvulsants. CONCLUSIONS: Substantial evidence suggests that dysphoric mania may be a distinct affective state. Contrary evidence, however, suggests that dysphoric mania may be a form of typical mania, a stage-related or severe form of mania, or a transitional state between mania and depression. Because the evidence may be inconsistent because of varying definitions of dysphoric mania among studies, the authors propose preliminary operational diagnostic criteria for the future study of dysphoric mania.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hamilton, M. (1960) · Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry · doi:10.1136/jnnp.23.1.56 · Cited by 32,817
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Electroconvulsive Treatment Compared With Lithium in the Management of Manic States
Small, J. G. (1988) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800320037004 · Cited by 246
Bunney, W. E. (1972) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1972.01750270005001 · Cited by 177
Cited by
Practice Bulletin No. 183: postpartum hemorrhage
(2017) · Obstetrics & Gynecology · doi:10.1097/aog.0000000000002351 · Cited by 1,406
College Students: Mental Health Problems and Treatment Considerations
Pedrelli, P., Nyer, M., Yeung, A., Zulauf, C., & Wilens, T. (2015) · Academic Psychiatry · doi:10.1007/s40596-014-0205-9 · Cited by 1,325
The National Depressive and Manic-depressive Association (DMDA) survey of bipolar members
Lish, J. D., Dime-Meenan, S., Whybrow, P. C., Price, R. A., & Hirschfeld, R. M. A. (1994) · Journal of Affective Disorders · doi:10.1016/0165-0327(94)90104-x · Cited by 897
Goldberg, J. F., Perlis, R. H., Bowden, C. L., Thase, M. E., Miklowitz, D. J., Marangell, L. B., Calabrese, J. R., Nierenberg, A. A., & Sachs, G. S. (2009) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.08050746 · Cited by 322
Salloum, I. M., Cornelius, J. R., Daley, D. C., Kirisci, L., Himmelhoch, J. M., & Thase, M. E. (2005) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.62.1.37 · Cited by 271
Metadata
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 1992-12-01
- Volume
- 149
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 1633-1644
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2418454560
- Cited by
- 433
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 7.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.