The DOI matches its Crossref record; 53 of the 53 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Amisulpride, an Unusual “Atypical” Antipsychotic: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The "atypical" profile of the new antipsychotics clozapine, olanzapine, quetiapine, and risperidone has been linked to combined antagonism of serotonin 2 (5-HT(2)) and dopamine 2 (D(2)) receptors. Although amisulpride is a highly selective D(3)/D(2) receptor antagonist, it is assumed to have atypical properties as well. The purpose of this article was to compare the atypical profile of amisulpride with that of the 5-HT(2)/D(2) antagonists. METHOD: Randomized controlled trials that compared amisulpride with conventional antipsychotics or placebo for patients with schizophrenia were identified and included in a meta-analysis. The mean effect sizes found for amisulpride were compared with those of an updated meta-analysis of the 5-HT(2)/D(2) antagonists. RESULTS: Eighteen randomized controlled trials of amisulpride (N=2,214) were found. In 11 studies of acutely ill patients it proved to be consistently more effective than conventional antipsychotics for global schizophrenic symptoms (measured with the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale) and negative symptoms. Amisulpride is to date the only atypical antipsychotic for which several studies of patients suffering predominantly from negative symptoms have been published. In four such studies amisulpride was significantly more effective than placebo. Three small studies with conventional antipsychotics as comparators showed only a trend in favor of amisulpride in this regard. Amisulpride was associated with clearly lower use of antiparkinsonian medication and with fewer dropouts due to adverse events than conventional antipsychotics. CONCLUSIONS: These results cast some doubt on the notion that combined 5-HT(2)/D(2) antagonism is the reason that the newer antipsychotic medications are effective for negative symptoms and have fewer extrapyramidal side effects.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Meta-analysis in clinical trials
DerSimonian, R., & Laird, N. (1986) · Controlled Clinical Trials · doi:10.1016/0197-2456(86)90046-2 · Cited by 39,552
The Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale.
Overall, J. E., & Gorham, D. R. (1962) · Psychological Reports · doi:10.2466/pr0.1962.10.3.799 · Cited by 11,090
Clozapine for the Treatment-Resistant Schizophrenic: A Double-blind Comparison With Chlorpromazine
Kane, J. (1988) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.1988.01800330013001 · Cited by 4,156
Antipsychotic-induced weight gain: a comprehensive research synthesis
Allison, D. B., Mentore, J. L., Heo, M., Chandler, L. P., Cappelleri, J. C., Infante, M. C., & Weiden, P. J. (1999) · American Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1176/ajp.156.11.1686 · Cited by 2,382
The Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS): Conceptual and Theoretical Foundations
Andreasen, N. C. (1989) · British Journal of Psychiatry · doi:10.1192/s0007125000291496 · Cited by 1,530
A simple, general purpose display of magnitude of experimental effect.
Rosenthal, R., & Rubin, D. B. (1982) · Journal of Educational Psychology · doi:10.1037//0022-0663.74.2.166 · Cited by 1,229
Geddes, J., Freemantle, N., Harrison, P., & Bebbington, P. (2000) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.321.7273.1371 · Cited by 1,062
Leucht, S., Pitschel-Walz, G., Abraham, D., & Kissling, W. (1999) · Schizophrenia Research · doi:10.1016/s0920-9964(98)00105-4 · Cited by 796
Self-citationDo Novel Antipsychotics Have Similar Pharmacological Characteristics? A Review of the Evidence
Arnt, J. (1998) · Neuropsychopharmacology · doi:10.1016/s0893-133x(97)00112-7 · Cited by 715
Atypical antipsychotics and weightgain — a systematic review
Taylor, D. M., & McAskill, R. (2000) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101006416.x · Cited by 433
Cited by
Second-generation versus first-generation antipsychotic drugs for schizophrenia: a meta-analysis
Leucht, S., Corves, C., Arbter, D., Engel, R. R., Li, C., & Davis, J. M. (2009) · The Lancet · doi:10.1016/s0140-6736(08)61764-x · Cited by 1,930
Self-citationCannabidiol enhances anandamide signaling and alleviates psychotic symptoms of schizophrenia
Leweke, F. M., Piomelli, D., Pahlisch, F., Muhl, D., Gerth, C. W., Hoyer, C., Klosterkötter, J., Hellmich, M., & Koethe, D. (2012) · Translational Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/tp.2012.15 · Cited by 1,059
Miyamoto, S., Duncan, G. E., Marx, C. E., & Lieberman, J. A. (2005) · Molecular Psychiatry · doi:10.1038/sj.mp.4001556 · Cited by 988
Half a century of antipsychotics and still a central role for dopamine D2 receptors
Kapur, S., & Mamo, D. (2003) · Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry · doi:10.1016/j.pnpbp.2003.09.004 · Cited by 638
Freedman, R. (2003) · New England Journal of Medicine · doi:10.1056/nejmra035458 · Cited by 587
Metadata
- Authors
- Leucht, S., Pitschel-Walz, G., Engel, R. R., & Kissling, W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2002-02-01
- Volume
- 159
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 180-190
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2115125760
- Cited by
- 470
- References
- 53
- FWCI
- 3.11
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Amisulpride, an Unusual “Atypical” Antipsychotic: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.180
- The paper
- Leucht, S., Pitschel-Walz, G., Engel, R. R., & Kissling, W. (2002). Amisulpride, an Unusual “Atypical” Antipsychotic: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.159.2.180
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.