The DOI matches its Crossref record; 6 of the 6 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Do Patients With Schizophrenia Wish to Be Involved in Decisions About Their Medical Treatment?
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Little is known about the desire of patients with schizophrenia to be involved in medical decisions affecting their treatment. METHOD: The authors administered the Autonomy Preference Index to 122 inpatients with schizophrenia. In addition, the patients filled out the Drug Attitude Inventory. Sociodemographic data and Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale ratings were available for all patients. RESULTS: The patients expressed a desire for shared decision making that was slightly greater than that of primary care patients. Negative attitudes toward medical treatment and younger age were associated with a higher desire for participation. CONCLUSIONS: It is important to meet the participation needs of patients who are dissatisfied with their psychiatric treatment.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) for schizophrenia.
Kay, S. R., Fiszbein, A., & Opler, L. A. (1987) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/13.2.261 · Cited by 21,378
Charles, C., Gafni, A., & Whelan, T. (1997) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/s0277-9536(96)00221-3 · Cited by 4,137
Ende, J., Kazis, L., Ash, A., & Moskowitz, M. A. (1989) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02596485 · Cited by 946
Shared decision making in psychiatry
Hamann, J., Leucht, S., & Kissling, W. (2003) · Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica · doi:10.1034/j.1600-0447.2003.00130.x · Cited by 306
Self-citationSubjective Response to Neuroleptics in Schizophrenia
Awad, A. G. (1993) · Schizophrenia Bulletin · doi:10.1093/schbul/19.3.609 · Cited by 276
Nease, R. F., & Brooks, W. B. (1995) · Journal of General Internal Medicine · doi:10.1007/bf02602742 · Cited by 139
Cited by
Patient preferences for shared decisions: A systematic review
Chewning, B., Bylund, C. L., Shah, B., Arora, N. K., Gueguen, J. A., & Makoul, G. (2012) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2011.02.004 · Cited by 849
Shared Decision Making and Medication Management in the Recovery Process
Deegan, P. E., & Drake, R. E. (2006) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.57.11.1636 · Cited by 490
Implementing shared decision making in routine mental health care
Slade, M. (2017) · World Psychiatry · doi:10.1002/wps.20412 · Cited by 422
Shared decision making interventions for people with mental health conditions
Duncan, E., Best, C., & Hagen, S. (2010) · Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews · doi:10.1002/14651858.cd007297.pub2 · Cited by 256
Shared decision making in mental health: prospects for personalized medicine
Drake, R. E., Cimpean, D., & Torrey, W. C. (2009) · Dialogues in Clinical Neuroscience · doi:10.31887/dcns.2009.11.4/redrake · Cited by 173
Metadata
- Authors
- Hamann, J., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., Busch, R., & Kissling, W.
- Venue
- American Journal of Psychiatry
- Published
- 2005-12-01
- Volume
- 162
- Issue
- 12
- Pages
- 2382-2384
- ISSN
- 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
- 1535-7228
- OpenAlex
- W2114075713
- Cited by
- 254
- References
- 6
- FWCI
- 32.18
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Do Patients With Schizophrenia Wish to Be Involved in Decisions About Their Medical Treatment? https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2382
- The paper
- Hamann, J., Cohen, R., Leucht, S., Busch, R., & Kissling, W. (2005). Do Patients With Schizophrenia Wish to Be Involved in Decisions About Their Medical Treatment? American Journal of Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.ajp.162.12.2382
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
