Cited by 193Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 38 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Life-Threatening Danger and Suppression of Attention Bias to Threat

Bar-Haim, Yair, Holoshitz, Yael, Eldar, Sharon, Frenkel, Tahl I., Muller, David, Charney, Dennis S., Pine, Daniel S., Fox, Nathan A., Wald, Ilan·2010·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Life-threatening danger is assumed to produce, in tandem, increases in both vigilance toward threat and stress-related symptoms, but no data test the validity of this assumption. The authors examined associations, in real time, among imminent life-threatening danger, stress-related symptoms, and vigilance. METHOD: Symptoms of posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), depression, and anxiety were measured in a civilian population (N=131) as a function of war-related stress, operationalized as the time available for seeking cover from rocket attack. A computerized measure of threat-related vigilance using a classic dot-probe attention task was also collected. RESULTS: PTSD symptoms, depression, and anxiety increased as a function of war-related threat. Acute proximal threat was associated with avoidance of, rather than vigilance toward, negative valence information. For participants within rocket range, the magnitude of threat bias varied with the magnitude of distress symptoms, such that as bias away from threat increased, distress symptoms increased. CONCLUSIONS: These data challenge current thinking about the role of attention in stress responding. Attentional threat avoidance may reduce the acute impact of imminent threat, but this may come at a price in terms of an elevated risk for psychopathology.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2009.09070956

Cites

38 of 38 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Show all 36 references

Research works printed but not linked: 3

  1. 10.1037/0022-006X.60.3.409 · DOI
  2. Weathers FW, 1993, The PTSD Checklist (PCL): reliability, validity, and diagnostic utility, in the Proceedings of the 1993 Annual Meeting of the International Society of Traumatic Stress Studies
  3. 10.1002/jts.2490100409 · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Metadata

Authors
Bar-Haim, Y., Holoshitz, Y., Eldar, S., Frenkel, T. I., Muller, D., Charney, D. S., Pine, D. S., Fox, N. A., & Wald, I.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2010-06-01
Volume
167
Issue
6
Pages
694-698
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2012664450
Cited by
193
References
36
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 10 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 9 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 19 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 19 · 2015: 17 · 2014: 16 · 2013: 23 · 2012: 14
FWCI
16.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
threat vigilance, attentional avoidance, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, anxiety, combat stress, rocket attacks, civilian population, stress response, psychopathology risk
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Adult, Aged, Anxiety Disorders, Arousal, Attention, Cues, Depressive Disorder, Fear, Female, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Repression, Psychology, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Young Adult

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review