Cited by 84Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchAnxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesPsychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research

Heightened attentional capture by threat in veterans with PTSD.

Open access
Olatunji, Bunmi O., Armstrong, Thomas, McHugo, Maureen, Zald, David H.·2013·Journal of Abnormal Psychology

Abstract

Although an attentional bias for threat-relevant cues has been theorized in posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD), to date empirical demonstration of this phenomenon has been at best inconsistent. Furthermore, the nature of this bias in PTSD has not been clearly delineated. In the present study, veterans with PTSD (n = 20), trauma-exposed veterans without PTSD (n = 16), and healthy nonveteran controls (n = 22) completed an emotional attentional blink task that measures the extent to which emotional stimuli capture and hold attention. Participants searched for a target embedded within a series of rapidly presented images. Critically, a combat-related, disgust, positive, or neutral distracter image appeared 200 ms, 400 ms, 600 ms, or 800 ms before the target. Impaired target detection was observed among veterans with PTSD relative to both veterans without PTSD and healthy nonveteran controls after only combat-related threat distracters when presented 200 ms, 400 ms, or 600 ms before the target, indicating increased attentional capture by cues of war and difficulty disengaging from such cues for an extended period. Veterans without PTSD and healthy nonveteran controls did not significantly differ from each other in target detection accuracy after combat-related threat distracters. These data support the presence of an attentional bias toward combat related stimuli in PTSD that should be a focus of treatment efforts.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1037/a0030440

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Combat-exposed veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder showed a strong attentional blink for combat images relative to healthy controls.

    “One of the most powerful examples of these lingering biases of attention is seen in AB tasks in which combat-exposed veterans with posttraumatic stress disorder showed a strong AB for combat images relative to healthy controls (Olatunji, Armstrong, McHugo, & Zald, 2013; cf. Smith, Most, Newsome, & Zald, 2006; for a review, see McHugo, Olatunji, & Zald, 2013).”

    From Selection history: How reward modulates selectivity of visual attention. (2018) · cites this paper as Olatunji, Armstrong, McHugo, & Zald, 2013

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. McNally RJ Amir N Lipke HJ Subliminal processing of threat cues in posttraumatic stress disorder? Journal of Anxiety Disorders 1996 10 115 128

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Olatunji, B. O., Armstrong, T., McHugo, M., & Zald, D. H.
Affiliations
Vanderbilt University (US)
Venue
Journal of Abnormal Psychology
Published
2013-05
Volume
122
Issue
2
Pages
397-405
ISSN
  • 0021-843X (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-1846
OpenAlex
W2137287841
Cited by
84
References
50
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 4 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 13 · 2016: 9 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 2
FWCI
3.98
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Journal of Abnormal Psychology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (T32MH064913)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychoanalysis and Psychopathology Research
Keywords
post-traumatic stress disorder, attentional bias, threat processing, attentional capture, veterans, attentional disengagement, disgust, trauma exposure
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Attention, Cues, Female, Humans, Male, Military Personnel, Photic Stimulation, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, United States, Veterans, Case-Control Studies, Iraq War, 2003-2011, Afghan Campaign 2001-

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review