Cited by 101Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesNeural and Behavioral Psychology StudiesChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development

Training-associated changes and stability of attention bias in youth: Implications for attention bias modification treatment for pediatric anxiety

Open access
Britton, Jennifer C., Bar-Haim, Yair, Clementi, Michelle A., Sankin, Lindsey S., Chen, Gang, Shechner, Tomer, Norcross, Maxine A., Spiro, Carolyn N. +2 more·2013·Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience

Abstract

Attention Bias Modification Treatment (ABMT), an emerging treatment for anxiety disorders, is thought to modify underlying, stable patterns of attention. Therefore, ABMT research should take into account the impact of attention bias stability on attention training response, especially in pediatric populations. ABMT research typically relies on the dot-probe task, where individuals detect a probe following an emotional-neutral stimulus pair. The current research presents two dot-probe experiments relevant to ABMT and attention-bias stability. In Experiment 1, anxious youth receiving 8-weeks of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) were randomly assigned to ABMT that trains attention towards happy faces (n=18) or placebo (n=18). Two additional comparison groups, anxious youth receiving only CBT (n=17) and healthy comparison youth (n=16), were studied. Active attention training towards happy faces did not augment clinician-rated response to CBT; however, individuals receiving training exhibited reductions on self-report measures of anxiety earlier than individuals receiving CBT only. In Experiment 2, healthy youth (n=12) completed a dot-probe task twice while undergoing functional magnetic resonance imaging. Intra-class correlation demonstrated stability of neural activation in response to attention bias in the ventrolateral prefrontal cortex and amygdala. Together, these two studies investigate the ways in which attention-bias stability may impact future work on ABMT.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.dcn.2012.11.001

Cites

51 of 51 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Many ABM studies find no evidence of AB in orienting to threat in anxious individuals before ABM training.

    “First, many ABM studies find no evidence of AB in orienting to threat in anxious individuals before ABM training (e.g., Boettcher et al., 2013;Britton et al., 2013;Carleton et al., 2015;Eldar et al., 2012;Heeren, Mogoas ¸e, McNally, et al., 2015;McNally et al., 2013;Waters et al., 2015).”

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Britton, J. C., Bar-Haim, Y., Clementi, M. A., Sankin, L. S., Chen, G., Shechner, T., Norcross, M. A., Spiro, C. N., Lindstrom, K. M., & Pine, D. S.
Affiliations
National Institute of Mental Health (US)
Corresponding author
Britton, Jennifer C.
Venue
Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2013-04
Volume
4
Pages
52-64
ISSN
1878-9293 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2088926725
Cited by
101
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2023: 5 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 12 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 20 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 8
FWCI
15.86
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Cognitive Neuroscience (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • Intramural Research Program of the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
  • National Institutes of Health
  • National Alliance of Research on Schizophrenia and Depression (NARSAD) Young Investigator Award (JCB)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Keywords
attentional bias modification, childhood anxiety, attention training, dot-probe task, cognitive behavioral therapy, ventrolateral prefrontal cortex, amygdala
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Amygdala, Anxiety Disorders, Attention, Child, Facial Expression, Female, Humans, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Pattern Recognition, Visual, Cognitive Behavioral Therapy, Treatment Outcome, Prefrontal Cortex, Self Report

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review