Cited by 324Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive ProcessesFace Recognition and PerceptionNeural and Behavioral Psychology Studies

Measuring attentional bias to threat: reliability of dot probe and eye movement indices

Waechter, Stephanie, Nelson, Andrea L., Wright, Caitlin, Hyatt, Ashley, Oakman, Jonathan·2014·Cognitive Therapy and Research

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1007/s10608-013-9588-2

Cites

82 of 82 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • AB indices derived from manual response times have limited reliability.

    “One research challenge is the limited reliability of AB indices derived from manual response times, which may reflect measurement problems and the variability of anxiety-related ABs, as discussed earlier [19,56-58,98].”
  • The limited reliability of AB indices derived from manual response times may reflect measurement problems and the variability of anxiety-related ABs.

    “One research challenge is the limited reliability of AB indices derived from manual response times, which may reflect measurement problems and the variability of anxiety-related ABs, as discussed earlier [19,56-58,98].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 83 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Waechter, S., Nelson, A. L., Wright, C., Hyatt, A., & Oakman, J.
Affiliations
  • University of Waterloo (CA)
  • University of Calgary (CA)
  • University of Toronto (CA)
Corresponding author
Waechter, Stephanie
Venue
Cognitive Therapy and Research
Published
2013-10-17
Volume
38
Issue
3
Pages
313-333
ISSN
  • 0147-5916 (ISSN-L)
  • 1573-2819
OpenAlex
W1993181611
Cited by
324
References
83
Citations by year
2026: 16 · 2025: 22 · 2024: 18 · 2023: 32 · 2022: 29 · 2021: 44 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 38 · 2018: 28 · 2017: 22 · 2016: 24 · 2015: 13 · 2014: 12
FWCI
22.13
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Cognitive Therapy and Research (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Face Recognition and Perception
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Keywords
attentional bias to threat, dot-probe task, psychometric reliability, social anxiety, facial expressions, angry faces, disgust, anxiety disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review