Cited by 181Child Welfare and AdoptionChild and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional DevelopmentChild Abuse and Trauma

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 37 of the 38 references it cites were found in a registry or an index; 7 of the 46 sources its claims cite were checked for support.

A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Foster Care and Institutional Care for Children With Signs of Reactive Attachment Disorder

Open access

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined signs of emotionally withdrawn (inhibited type) and indiscriminately social (disinhibited type) reactive attachment disorder in Romanian children enrolled in a randomized trial of foster care compared with institutional care and in a comparison group of never-institutionalized children. METHOD: At baseline and when children were ages 30, 42, and 54 months and 8 years, caregivers were interviewed with the Disturbances of Attachment Interview to assess changes in signs of reactive attachment disorder in three groups of children: those receiving care as usual (including continued institutional care) (N=68); those placed in foster care after institutional care (N=68); and those who were never institutionalized (N=72). The impact of gender, ethnicity, and baseline cognitive ability was also examined. RESULTS: On the Disturbances of Attachment Interview, signs of the inhibited type of reactive attachment disorder decreased after placement in foster care, and scores were indistinguishable from those of never-institutionalized children after 30 months. Signs of the disinhibited type were highest in the usual care group, lower in the foster care group, and lowest in the never-institutionalized group. Early placement in foster care (before age 24 months) was associated with fewer signs of the disinhibited type. Lower baseline cognitive ability was associated with more signs of the inhibited type in the usual care group and more signs of the disinhibited type in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Signs of the inhibited type of reactive attachment disorder responded quickly to placement in foster care; signs of the disinhibited type showed less robust resolution with foster placement. Lower baseline cognitive ability was linked to signs of reactive attachment disorder.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11050748

Cites

37 of 37 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Nothing to recompute.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

7 of 46 cited sources checked · 2 supported · 0 flagged · accuracy not yet measured

Show all 41 claims

  • Probably not a substantial claim. 14
  • It may state two separate claims as one. 22
  • The quote only partly states this claim. 1
31 of 31
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    Before this study, no planned intervention studies of attachment disorders had been conducted.

    “To our knowledge, there have been no previous planned intervention studies of attachment disorders, although some natural experiments have provided valuable data.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No previous studies had examined the impact of the intervention on attachment disorders.

    “No previous studies have examined the impact of the intervention on attachment disorders.”
  • The paper relies on this without support.

    No randomized trial comparing foster care and institutional care had been conducted until the BEIP was initiated in 2001.

    “Despite 60 years of research comparing young children in foster care and those in institutional care, no randomized trial had been conducted until the Bucharest Early Intervention Project was initiated in 2001.”
  • The authors state this as an assumption.

    The repeated-measures analyses assume data are missing at random.

    “repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA; likelihood model, data missing at random, SAS PROC MIXED, two groups and 5 assessments)”
4 of 4

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

Each contradiction between two passages listed here was confirmed by an independent check.

  • Claim of lasting similarity conflicts with the eight-year comparison

    Major

    The abstract says the foster-care and never-institutionalized groups had indistinguishable inhibited-type scores after 30 months, but the results report a difference between those groups at eight years.

1 of 1

Citations

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Show all 38 references

1 of the 38 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Bakermans-Kranenburg MJ, 2011, Int J Behav Dev, 36, 1
  2. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0355(199921)20:1<42::AID-IMHJ4>3.0.CO;2-B · DOI · Paper page

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Items 101–102 of 102

Metadata

Authors
Smyke, A. T., Zeanah, C. H., Gleason, M. M., Drury, S. S., Fox, N. A., Nelson, C. A., & Guthrie, D.
Affiliations
Tulane University (US)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-05
Volume
169
Issue
5
Pages
508-514
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2096000669
Cited by
181
References
38
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 8 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 13 · 2019: 14 · 2018: 20 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 14 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 13 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 6
FWCI
34.91
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (acceptedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (R01MH091363)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
Keywords
reactive attachment disorder, foster care, institutional care, Romanian orphans
MeSH terms
Child, Child, Preschool, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Institutionalization, Interview, Psychological, Male, Neuropsychological Tests, Romania, Reactive Attachment Disorder, Early Diagnosis

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

A language model drew the claims from the paper on 2026-09-29, under version 3 of the claim definition (model deepseek-v4.1-flash, prompt extract-v3).

A second model labelled each claim on 2026-09-29 (model jev-1.13-20260917, definition revision gold-guideline-v0.2).

Cited sources are checked with a language model’s help (gpt-6-sol).

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review