Cited by 2Child Welfare and AdoptionChild Abuse and TraumaEarly Childhood Education and Development

Caregiving Quality and Adolescent Cortical Structure: A 16‐Year Longitudinal Study of Institutionally Reared Youth

Open access
Lurie, Lucy A., Gruhn, Meredith A., Garrisi, Kathryn, McLaughlin, Katie A., Humphreys, Kathryn L., Zeanah, Charles H., Fox, Nathan A., Nelson, Charles A. +1 more·2025·Developmental Science

Abstract

Severe psychosocial deprivation in early childhood experienced by institutionally reared children changes the course of structural brain development. Evidence from the Bucharest Early Intervention Project (BEIP) has demonstrated a causal association of random assignment to high‐quality foster care intervention in early childhood with remediation of adolescent structural brain development. To date, however, caregiving quality has not been examined as a mechanism contributing to these neurodevelopmental changes. Moreover, further delineating the effects of developmental timing of high‐quality caregiving experiences on neural development is critical to inform intervention for early psychosocial deprivation. In the present study, early childhood caregiving quality was examined as a mechanism underlying foster care intervention and adolescent brain structure among ever‐institutionalized youth in the BEIP. Additionally, we examined the effect of the developmental timing of high‐quality caregiving experiences across development on adolescent brain structure in both ever‐ and never‐institutionalized youth. In Analysis 1, we observed a significant indirect effect of high caregiving quality following random assignment to the foster care intervention on cortical thickness in the left inferior frontal gyrus and surface area in the right lateral occipital cortex at Age 16. In Analysis 2, the earliest caregiving experiences were uniquely and consistently associated with adolescent cortical thickness. However, high‐quality caregiving experiences across childhood and adolescence were associated with adolescent cortical surface area in distinct regions. Taken together, findings suggest that high‐quality caregiving experiences across development, but especially in early childhood, can influence adolescent cortical structure even when accounting for experiences of caregiving adversity. Summary: Greater early childhood caregiving quality mediated the association of random assignment to foster care intervention and thinner left inferior frontal gyrus among ever‐institutionalized adolescents. The earliest caregiving experiences were uniquely and consistently associated with adolescent cortical thickness outcomes in the lateral prefrontal, temporal, and lateral occipital cortices. Greater caregiving quality across childhood and adolescence was associated with greater cortical surface area in distinct regions of the frontoparietal network and lateral occipital cortex. Taken together, findings support that high‐quality caregiving experiences across development, but particularly in early childhood, influence adolescent cortical structure outcomes.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1111/desc.70043

Cites

63 of 63 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lurie, L. A., Gruhn, M. A., Garrisi, K., McLaughlin, K. A., Humphreys, K. L., Zeanah, C. H., Fox, N. A., Nelson, C. A., & Sheridan, M. A.
Affiliations
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (US)
  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center (US)
  • Harvard University (US)
  • Vanderbilt University (US)
  • Tulane University (US)
  • University of Maryland, College Park (US)
  • Boston Children's Hospital (US)
Corresponding author
Lurie, Lucy A.
Venue
Developmental Science
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2025-07-03
Volume
28
Issue
5
Pages
e70043-e70043
ISSN
  • 1363-755X (ISSN-L)
  • 1467-7687
OpenAlex
W4412006000
Cited by
2
References
63
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 1
FWCI
2.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Developmental Science (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Europe PMC (PubMed Central) (acceptedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institute of Mental Health (R01‐MH091363, K01‐MH092526, K01‐MH092555, R01‐MH115004, F31‐MH136728)
  • John D. and Catherine T. MacArthur Foundation
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Safety Research › Child Welfare and Adoption
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Child Abuse and Trauma
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
caregiving quality, institutionalized children, psychosocial deprivation, adolescent brain development, cortical thickness, cortical surface area, inferior frontal gyrus, lateral occipital cortex, Bucharest Early Intervention Project, frontoparietal network
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Cerebral Cortex, Child, Child, Institutionalized, Female, Foster Home Care, Humans, Longitudinal Studies, Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Male, Psychosocial Deprivation, Caregivers, Adolescent Development

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review