Cited by 122Posttraumatic Stress Disorder ResearchDisaster Management and ResilienceCOVID-19 and Mental Health

Mental health and social networks after disaster

Open access
Bryant, Richard A., Gallagher, H. Colin, Gibbs, Lisa, Pattison, Philippa, MacDougall, Colin, Harms, Louise, Block, Karen, Baker, Elyse +5 more·2017·American Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Although disasters are a major cause of mental health problems and typically affect large numbers of people and communities, little is known about how social structures affect mental health after a disaster. The authors assessed the extent to which mental health outcomes after disaster are associated with social network structures. METHOD: In a community-based cohort study of survivors of a major bushfire disaster, participants (N=558) were assessed for probable posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and probable depression. Social networks were assessed by asking participants to nominate people with whom they felt personally close. These nominations were used to construct a social network map that showed each participant's ties to other participants they nominated and also to other participants who nominated them. This map was then analyzed for prevailing patterns of mental health outcomes. RESULTS: Depression risk was higher for participants who reported fewer social connections, were connected to other depressed people, or were connected to people who had left their community. PTSD risk was higher if fewer people reported being connected with the participant, if those who felt close to the participant had higher levels of property loss, or if the participant was linked to others who were themselves not interconnected. Interestingly, being connected to other people who in turn were reciprocally close to each other was associated with a lower risk of PTSD. CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide the first evidence of disorder-specific patterns in relation to one's social connections after disaster. Depression appears to co-occur in linked individuals, whereas PTSD risk is increased with social fragmentation. These patterns underscore the need to adopt a sociocentric perspective of postdisaster mental health in order to better understand the potential for societal interventions in the wake of disaster.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.2016.15111403

Cites

56 of 56 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Edited by Carrington PJ, Scott J, Wasserman S. Cambridge, UK, Cambridge University Press, 2005, pp 98-116
  2. Pitman RK, Shalev AY, Orr SP: Posttraumatic stress disorder: emotion, conditioning, and memory, in The New Cognitive Neu- roscience, 2nd ed. Edited by Corbetta MD, Gazzaniga M. New York, Plenum Press, 2000

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Bryant, R. A., Gallagher, H. C., Gibbs, L., Pattison, P., MacDougall, C., Harms, L., Block, K., Baker, E., Sinnott, V., Ireton, G., Richardson, J., Forbes, D., & Lusher, D.
Affiliations
The University of Sydney (AU)
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2017-03-01
Volume
174
Issue
3
Pages
277-285
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W2554345942
Cited by
122
References
56
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 13 · 2022: 24 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 1
FWCI
7.58
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Swinburne figshare (Swinburne University of Technology) (submittedVersion)
Funders
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • Australian Rotary Health (LP100200164)
  • University of New South Wales
  • Swinburne University of Technology
  • Flinders University
  • Department of Health, State Government of Victoria
  • Australian Research Council (LP100200164)
  • Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Research
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Disaster Management and Resilience
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › COVID-19 and Mental Health
Keywords
disaster mental health, social networks, post-traumatic stress disorder, depression, social connectedness, social fragmentation, property loss, community cohesion
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Depressive Disorder, Disasters, Female, Fires, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk, Social Support, Stress Disorders, Post-Traumatic, Victoria, Cohort Studies, Outcome Assessment, Health Care, Survivors, Protective Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review