Cited by 16Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and PostpartumMaternal and Perinatal Health InterventionsMaternal and Neonatal Healthcare

Stratifying Risk for Postpartum Depression at Time of Hospital Discharge

Open access
Clapp, Mark A., Castro, Victor M., Verhaak, Pilar, McCoy, Thomas H., Shook, Lydia L., Edlow, Andrea G., Perlis, Roy H.·2025·American Journal of Psychiatry

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Postpartum depression (PPD) is a major contributor to postpartum morbidity and mortality. Beyond efforts at routine screening, risk stratification models could enable more targeted interventions in settings with limited resources. The authors sought to develop and estimate the performance of a generalizable risk stratification model for PPD in patients without a history of depression, using information collected as part of routine clinical care. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective cohort study of all individuals who delivered between 2017 and 2022 in one of two large academic medical centers and six community hospitals. An elastic net model was constructed and externally validated to predict PPD, defined as having a mood disorder, an antidepressant prescription, or a positive screen on the postpartum Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale. Predictors used included sociodemographic factors, medical history, and prenatal depression screening information, all of which were known before discharge from the delivery hospitalization. RESULTS: The cohort included 29,168 individuals; 2,696 (9.2%) met at least one criterion for postpartum depression in the 6 months following delivery. In the external validation data, the model had good discrimination and remained well calibrated: the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.721 (95% CI=0.709, 0.736), and the Brier calibration score was 0.087 (95% CI=0.083, 0.091). At a specificity of 90%, the positive predictive value was 28.8% (95% CI=26.7, 30.8), and the negative predictive value was 92.2% (95% CI=91.8, 92.7). CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate that a simple machine-learning model can be used to stratify the risk for PPD before delivery hospitalization discharge. This tool could help identify patients within a practice at the highest risk and facilitate individualized postpartum care planning for the prevention of, screening for, and management of PPD at the start of the postpartum period and potentially the onset of symptoms.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ajp.20240381

Cites

27 of 27 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The prior machine learning model had an AUC of 0.75.

    “Their model demonstrated improved discriminatory ability as compared to our multivariable regression model, with an AUC of 0.75 (compared to our AUC of 0.67).”
  • All prior studies predicting PPD have found that varying aspects of mental health history are the strongest predictors of PPD.

    “Consistent with our findings, all prior studies predicting PPD have found that varying aspects of mental health history (i.e., anxiety disorders and prenatal EPDS score [53]; depression and anxiety history, recent psychiatric medication use [54]; psychiatric history [55]; anxiety, depression, and antidepressants during pregnancy [56]) are the strongest predictors of PPD.”
  • A recent publication presented results from a machine learning model leveraging variables routinely documented during prenatal care and delivery hospitalization to predict PPD among a large cohort (n = 29,168) without history of depressive symptoms.

    “Specific to perinatal mental health, a recent publication [53] presented results from a machine learning model leveraging variables routinely documented during prenatal care and delivery hospitalization to predict PPD among a large cohort (n = 29,168) without history of depressive symptoms.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Clapp, M. A., Castro, V. M., Verhaak, P., McCoy, T. H., Shook, L. L., Edlow, A. G., & Perlis, R. H.
Affiliations
Harvard University (US)
Corresponding author
Clapp, Mark A.
Venue
American Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2025-06-01
Volume
182
Issue
6
Pages
551-559
ISSN
  • 0002-953X (ISSN-L)
  • 1535-7228
OpenAlex
W4410479309
Cited by
16
References
26
Citations by year
2026: 10 · 2025: 6
FWCI
14.57
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Licence
cc-by-nc-nd
Locations
  • American Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • medRxiv (acceptedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed Central (submittedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
Funders
  • Simons Foundation Autism Research Initiative
  • National Institute of Mental Health (MH118919, R01MH123804, R01MH116270, RF1MH132336, U54MH118919)
  • National Institute of Child Health and Human Development
  • Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (R01HD100022)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Maternal Mental Health During Pregnancy and Postpartum
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Obstetrics and Gynecology › Maternal and Perinatal Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Maternal and Neonatal Healthcare
Keywords
postpartum depression, risk stratification, risk prediction model, hospital discharge, machine learning, elastic net, Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale, depression screening

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review