Cited by 136Eating Disorders and BehaviorsMental Health Treatment and AccessObesity and Health Practices

Clinician Reactions to Patients With Eating Disorders: A Review of the Literature

Thompson-Brenner, Heather, Satir, Dana A., Franko, Debra L., Herzog, David B.·2012·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The delivery of psychiatric services may be affected by clinicians' negative reactions to treatment-resistant or stigmatized patient groups. Some research has found that clinicians across professional disciplines react negatively to patients with eating disorders, but empirical data related to this topic have not been systematically reviewed. The authors sought to review all published empirical studies of clinician reactions to patients with eating disorders in order to characterize negative reactions to these patients and identify patient or clinical factors associated with negative reactions. METHODS: The authors conducted a comprehensive online search for all published studies of clinician reactions in regard to patients with eating disorders. The reference lists of articles found in the literature search were examined to identify additional studies. RESULTS: Twenty studies, published between 1984 and 2010, were found. Clinician negative reactions in regard to patients with eating disorders typically reflected frustration, hopelessness, lack of competence, and worry. Inexperienced clinicians appeared to hold more negative attitudes toward patients with eating disorders than toward other patient groups, but experienced psychotherapists did not experience strong negative reactions to patients with eating disorders. Medical practitioners consistently reported strong feelings of lack of competence in treating eating disorders. Negative reactions to patients with eating disorders were associated with patients' lack of improvement and personality pathology and with clinicians' stigmatizing beliefs, inexperience, and gender. CONCLUSIONS: Research about the impact of negative clinician attitudes toward patients with eating disorders on psychiatric service delivery, including multivariate analyses using larger samples, comparison groups, validated instruments, and experimental methods, is much needed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201100050

Cites

45 of 45 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Thompson-Brenner, H., Satir, D. A., Franko, D. L., & Herzog, D. B.
Affiliations
  • Dr. Thompson-Brenner is affiliated with the Center for Anxiety and Related Disorders, Department of Psychology, Boston University, 648 Beacon St., Boston, MA 02215 (e-mail: ).
  • Boston University (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2012-01
Volume
63
Issue
1
Pages
73-78
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W1987603103
Cited by
136
References
45
Citations by year
2026: 15 · 2025: 14 · 2024: 15 · 2023: 15 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 10 · 2018: 10 · 2017: 8 · 2016: 8 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
FWCI
8.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
National Institute of Mental Health (K23MH071641)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Obesity and Health Practices
Keywords
eating disorders, clinician attitudes, stigma, treatment-resistant patients, clinician competence, clinician experience, personality pathology, gender differences
MeSH terms
Adolescent, Feeding and Eating Disorders, Attitude of Health Personnel, Clinical Competence, Emotions, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Male, Personality Disorders, Professional-Patient Relations, Sex Factors, Comorbidity, Treatment Refusal, Treatment Outcome, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review