Cited by 137Eating Disorders and BehaviorsPsychological Treatments and DisordersNutrition, Health and Food Behavior

Managing the chronic, treatment-resistant patient with anorexia nervosa

Strober, Michael·2004·International Journal of Eating Disorders

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To describe the psychopathology of chronic, treatment-resistant anorexia nervosa, as well as a paradigm for its clinical management. METHOD: The foundation of the approach integrates clinical experience, empirical psychological findings, and a conceptual understanding of developmental and phenomenologic aspects of the illness. RESULTS: Elements of the management paradigm take account of the compensatory nature of illness chronicity. The inherent risks of treating these patients in the customary way are described, along with therapist countertransference that must be anticipated and effectively considered. DISCUSSION: The chronically ill patient requires a unique approach to care, one that minimizes the risk of iatrogenic effects of rapid weight restoration or failure to appraise the deleterious influences of therapist countertransference.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1002/eat.20054

Cites

7 of 7 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Terms such as 'treatment resistant', 'treatment refractory', 'recalcitrant', and 'severe and intractable' have appeared frequently in eating disorder research and commentaries, often within sweeping statements suggesting patients who have not recovered within a number of years are unlikely to improve with further treatment.

    “Terms such as “treatment resistant” (120 p. 247), “treatment refractory” (121 p. 372), “recalcitrant” (122), and “severe and intractable” (123) have appeared frequently in ED research and commentaries, often within sweeping statements suggesting patients who have not recovered within a number of years are unlikely to improve with further treatment.”
  • Management of transference and countertransference are important features of how patients experience ED care and how clinicians respond, particularly in enduring EDs, and must be effectively managed to reduce iatrogenic harms in SE-AN treatment.

    “Management of transference and countertransference are important features of how we experience ED care and how clinicians respond to us, particularly in enduring EDs, and must be effectively managed to reduce iatrogenic harms in treatment of SE-AN [175].”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Strober, M.
Affiliations
University of California, Los Angeles (US)
Corresponding author
Strober, Michael
Venue
International Journal of Eating Disorders
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2004-10-11
Volume
36
Issue
3
Pages
245-255
ISSN
  • 0276-3478 (ISSN-L)
  • 1098-108X
OpenAlex
W1969029698
Cited by
137
References
7
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 4 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 8 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 10 · 2020: 16 · 2019: 5 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 10 · 2014: 9 · 2013: 15 · 2012: 6
FWCI
1.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Eating Disorders (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Eating Disorders and Behaviors
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychological Treatments and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Nutrition and Dietetics › Nutrition, Health and Food Behavior
Keywords
anorexia nervosa, chronic disease, psychopathology, clinical management, iatrogenic disease
MeSH terms
Adult, Anorexia Nervosa, Chronic Disease, Countertransference, Female, Hospitalization, Humans, Professional-Patient Relations, Treatment Failure

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review