Cited by 28Medication Adherence and ComplianceMental Health and Patient InvolvementMobile Health and mHealth Applications

Use of a Web-Based Shared Decision-Making Program: Impact on Ongoing Treatment Engagement and Antipsychotic Adherence

Open access
Finnerty, Molly T., Layman, Deborah M., Chen, Qingxian, Leckman-Westin, Emily, Bermeo, Nicole, Ng-Mak, Daisy S., Rajagopalan, Krithika, Hoagwood, Kimberly E.·2018·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The authors examined the impact of a Web-based shared decision-making application, MyCHOIS-CommonGround, on ongoing outpatient mental health treatment engagement (all users) and antipsychotic medication adherence (users with schizophrenia). METHODS: An intervention study was conducted by comparing Medicaid-enrolled MyCHOIS-CommonGround users in 12 participating mental health clinics (N=472) with propensity score-matched adults receiving services in nonparticipating clinics (N=944). Medicaid claims were used to assess ongoing treatment engagement and antipsychotic adherence (among individuals with schizophrenia) one year prior to and after entry into the cohort. Multilevel linear models were conducted to estimate the effects of the MyCHOIS-CommonGround program over time. RESULTS: No differences during the baseline year were found between the MyCHOIS-CommonGround group and the matched control group on demographic, diagnostic, or service use characteristics. At one-year follow-up, engagement in outpatient mental health services was significantly higher for MyCHOIS-CommonGround users than for the control group (months with a service, 8.54±.22 versus 6.95±.15; β=1.40, p<.001). Among individuals with schizophrenia, antipsychotic medication adherence was also higher during the follow-up year among MyCHOIS-CommonGround users compared with the control group (proportion of days covered by medication, .78±.04 versus .69±.03; β=.06, p<.01). CONCLUSIONS: These findings provide new evidence that shared decision-making tools may promote ongoing mental health treatment engagement for individuals with serious mental illness and improved antipsychotic medication adherence for those with schizophrenia.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201800130

Cites

49 of 49 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 2

  1. Parsons LS: Performing a 1:N case-control match on propensity score (paper 165-29); in Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual SAS Users Group International Conference.
  2. Cary, NC, SAS In- stitute, 2004. http://www2.sas.com/proceedings/sugi29/165-29.pdf

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Finnerty, M. T., Layman, D. M., Chen, Q., Leckman-Westin, E., Bermeo, N., Ng-Mak, D. S., Rajagopalan, K., & Hoagwood, K. E.
Affiliations
  • Fordham University (US)
  • Dr. Finnerty, Ms. Layman, Ms. Chen, Dr. Leckman-Westin, and Ms. Bermeo are with the New York State Office of Mental Health (NYSOMH), New York. Dr. Finnerty is also with the Department of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry, New York University Langone Health, New York, where Dr. Hoagwood is affiliated. Ms. Layman is also a doctoral student, Department of Psychology, Fordham University, New York. Dr. Leckman-Westin is also with the Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, State...
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2018-12-01
Volume
69
Issue
12
Pages
1215-1221
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W2894946705
Cited by
28
References
48
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 7 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 2
FWCI
2.28
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Medication Adherence and Compliance
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mobile Health and mHealth Applications
Keywords
shared decision-making, web-based decision support, antipsychotic adherence, treatment engagement, outpatient mental health services, schizophrenia, severe mental illness, Medicaid
MeSH terms
Adult, Decision Making, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Humans, Male, Medicaid, Medical Informatics Applications, Middle Aged, Outcome and Process Assessment, Health Care, Patient Participation, Schizophrenia, Antipsychotic Agents, United States, Medication Adherence

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review