Cited by 85Mental Health Treatment and AccessSocial and Intergroup PsychologyInclusion and Disability in Education and Sport

Effect of Contact-Based Interventions on Stigma and Discrimination: A Critical Examination of the Evidence

Jorm, Anthony F.·2020·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

Contact-based interventions are commonly regarded as best practice in stigma reduction. In this Open Forum, the author used the findings from eight systematic reviews to critically evaluate the quality of the evidence for the effectiveness of such interventions. He found that trials of contact-based interventions lacked methodological rigor, reporting was biased toward positive results, the trials were subject to demand characteristics, no dose effects were observed, effects did not last, and no evidence supported behavior change. Standards for future trials are proposed and implications for reducing stigma and discrimination are discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.ps.201900587

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Jorm, A. F.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Jorm, Anthony F.
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
2020-07-01
Volume
71
Issue
7
Pages
735-737
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W3012326994
Cited by
85
References
18
Citations by year
2026: 5 · 2025: 12 · 2024: 16 · 2023: 9 · 2022: 30 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 5
FWCI
14.21
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Inclusion and Disability in Education and Sport
Keywords
contact-based interventions, stigma reduction, discrimination, methodological quality, trial design, reporting bias, demand characteristics, dose-response relationship, long-term effects, behavior change, quality of evidence
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Mental Health, Prejudice, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Social Stigma, Social Discrimination

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review