Cited by 372Mental Health Treatment and AccessSocial and Intergroup PsychologySchizophrenia research and treatment

Interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness: Systematic review and meta-analysis

Morgan, Amy J., Reavley, Nicola J., Ross, Anna, Too, Lay San, Jorm, Anthony F.·2018·Journal of Psychiatric Research

Abstract

This review evaluates the evidence on what interventions are effective in reducing public stigma towards people with severe mental illness, defined as schizophrenia, psychosis or bipolar disorder. We included 62 randomised controlled trials of contact interventions, educational interventions, mixed contact and education, family psychoeducation programs, and hallucination simulations. Contact interventions led to small-to-medium reductions in stigmatising attitudes (d = 0.39, 95% CI: 0.22 to 0.55) and desire for social distance (d = 0.59, 95% CI: 0.37 to 0.80) post-intervention, but these were reduced after adjusting for publication bias (d = 0.24 and d = 0.40, respectively). Effects did not vary by type or length of contact. Effects at follow-up were smaller and not significant. Education interventions led to small-to-medium reductions in stigmatising attitudes (d = 0.30, 95% CI: 0.14 to 0.47) and desire for social distance (d = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.08 to 0.46) post-intervention. Small improvements in social distance persisted up to 6 months later (d = 0.27, 95% CI: 0.05 to 0.49), but not attitudes (d = 0.03, 95% CI: -0.12 to 0.18). The combination of contact and education showed similar effects to those that presented either intervention alone, and head-to-head comparisons did not show a clear advantage for either kind of intervention. Family psychoeducation programs showed reductions in stigma post-intervention (d = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.70). The effectiveness of hallucination simulations was mixed. In conclusion, contact interventions and educational interventions have small-to-medium immediate effects upon stigma, but further research is required to investigate how to sustain benefits in the longer-term, and to understand the active ingredients of interventions to maximise their effectiveness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.05.017

Cites

86 of 86 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Social contact had a consistently positive effect on reducing stigmatising attitudes, perceived stigma in help seeking, and social distance.

    “Social contact had a consistently positive effect on reducing stigmatising attitudes, perceived stigma in help seeking, and social distance.186,195,198,[203][204][205][206][207][208]”
  • Video-based contact combined with education was effective in reducing stigma among students and health professionals, and led to a more balanced portrayal of people with mental health problems by media professionals.

    “Video-based contact combined with education was effective in reducing stigma among students in general and among health professionals, 198,199,[209][210][211] and led to a more balanced portrayal of people with mental health problems by media professionals.212”
  • Combined interventions, particularly those including educational and social contact components, significantly reduced stigmatising attitudes and social distance.

    “Combined interventions, particularly those including educational and social contact components, significantly reduced stigmatising attitudes and social distance.178,196,198,199”
  • Although simulated hallucinations increased empathy for people with schizophrenia, evidence for their effectiveness in causing attitude change is inconsistent, with some studies indicating they may worsen rather than improve attitudes and desire for social distance.

    “Although simulated hallucinations increased empathy for people with schizophrenia, the evidence for their effectiveness in causing attitude change is inconsistent, with some studies indicating that they may worsen rather than improve attitudes and desire for social distance.198”
  • Only two interventions to reduce stigma towards people with severe mental illness had been evaluated in Australia, one of which was only available as part of a university experiment.

    “Furthermore, only two interventions had been evaluated in Australia, one of which was only available as part of a university experiment.”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Morgan, A. J., Reavley, N. J., Ross, A., Too, L. S., & Jorm, A. F.
Affiliations
The University of Melbourne (AU)
Corresponding author
Morgan, Amy J.
Venue
Journal of Psychiatric Research
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2018-08
Volume
103
Pages
120-133
ISSN
0022-3956 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2804498743
Cited by
372
References
86
Citations by year
2026: 39 · 2025: 46 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 71 · 2022: 76 · 2021: 39 · 2020: 26 · 2019: 16 · 2018: 2
FWCI
3.14
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Psychiatric Research (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Minerva Access (University of Melbourne) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Commonwealth Department of Health, Australia
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Social and Intergroup Psychology
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
Keywords
public stigma, severe mental illness, schizophrenia, psychosis, bipolar disorder, contact interventions, educational intervention, family psychoeducation, stigmatizing attitudes, social distance, intervention effectiveness
MeSH terms
Mental Disorders, Humans, Psychological Distance, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Early Intervention, Educational, Social Stigma

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review