Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 162

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Effects of Depressed Mood on Objective and Subjective Measures of Attention

Farrin, L.·2003·Journal of Neuropsychiatry

Abstract

People with depression report frequent cognitive failures, but objective measures of cognition show mixed results. Some studies show impairment on effortful tasks. The relationship between subjective and objective cognitive failures was studied in 102 "depressed" or "nondepressed" UK servicemen, grouped by Beck Depression Inventory scores with a cutoff score of 10. Participants were administered cognitive tests including the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART), a laboratory measure of vigilance that has revealed increased attentional lapses in traumatic brain injury patients. The depressed men made more errors on SART than the nondepressed men (P=0.012) but reported much higher incidences of cognitive failures on a standardized questionnaire (P=0.0001). The depressed men's SART reaction times slowed following an error, a pattern different from that of brain-injured subjects. Nonclinical depressed subjects may respond "catastrophically" to errors, heightening the subjective sense of failure and contributing to the strong relationship between subjectively reported cognitive failures and depression.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15.1.98

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 3 references

Research works printed but not linked: 20

  1. Hartlage S, Alloy LB, Vazquez C, et al: Automatic and effortful processing in depression. Psychol Bull 1993; 113:247-278 · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.113.2.247 · Paper page
  2. Massman PJ, Delis DC, Butters N, et al: The subcortical dysfunction hypothesis of memory deficits in depression: neuropsychological validation in a subgroup of patients. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1992; 14:687-706 · DOI · Paper page
  3. Weingartner H, Cohen RM, Murphey DL: Cognitive processes in depression. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1981; 38:42-47 · DOI · Paper page
  4. Kahn RL, Zarit SH, Hilbert NM, et al: Memory complaint and impairment in the aged: the effect of depression and altered brain function. Arch Gen Psychiatry 1985; 32:1569-1573 · DOI · Paper page
  5. Cope H, Pernet A, Kendell B, et al: Cognitive functioning and magnetic resonance imaging in chronic fatigue. Br J Psychiatry 1995; 167:86-94 · DOI
  6. Weardon AJ, Appleby L: Research on cognitive complaints and cognitive functioning in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS): what conclusions can we draw? J Psychosom Res 1996; 41:197-211 · DOI
  7. Broadbent DE, Cooper PF, Fitzgerald P, et al: The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. Br J Clin Psychol 1982; 21:1-16 · DOI · Paper page
  8. Mahoney AM, Dalby JT, King MC: Cognitive failures and stress. Psychol Rep 1998; 82:1432-1434 · DOI
  9. Wagle AC, Berrios GE, Ho L: The Cognitive Failures Questionnaire in psychiatry. Compr Psychiatry 1999; 40:478-484 · DOI
  10. Robertson IH, Manly T, Andrade J, et al: “Oops!”: performance correlates of everyday attentional failures in traumatic brain injured and normal subjects. Neuropsychologia 1997; 35:747-758 · DOI · Paper page
  11. Unwin C, Blatchley N, Coker W, et al: Health of UK servicemen who served in the Persian Gulf War. Lancet 1999; 353:169-182 · DOI · Paper page
  12. Crawford JR, Besson JA, Parker DM, et al: Estimation of premorbid intellectual status in depression. Br J Clin Psychol 1987; 26:313-314 · DOI
  13. Brown RG, Scott LC, Bench CJ, et al: Cognitive function in depression: its relationship to the presence and severity of intellectual decline. Psychol Med 1994; 24:829-847 · DOI
  14. Manly T, Robertson IH, Galloway M, et al: The absent mind: further investigations of sustained attention to response. Neuropsychologia 1999; 37:661-670 · DOI · Paper page
  15. Johnson SK, Lange G, DeLuca J, et al: The effects of fatigue on neuropsychological performance in patients with chronic fatigue syndrome, multiple sclerosis and depression. Appl Neuropsychol 1997; 4:145-153 · DOI
  16. Mialet JP, Pope HG, Yurgelun-Todd D: Impaired attention in depressive states: a non-specific deficit? Psychol Med 1996; 26:1009-1020 · DOI
  17. Merckelbach H, Muris P, Nijman H, et al: Self-reported cognitive failures and neurotic symptomology. Personality and Individual Differences 1996; 20:715-724 · DOI
  18. Van Gorp WG, Satz P, Hinkin C, et al: Metacognition in HIV-1 seropositive asymptomatic individuals: self-ratings versus objective neuropsychological performance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1992; 13:812-819 · DOI
  19. Gass CS, Apple C: Cognitive complaints in closed-head injury: relationship to memory test performance and emotional disturbance. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol 1997; 19:290-299 · DOI
  20. Binder LM, Storzbach D, Anger W, et al: Subjective cognitive complaints, affective distress, and objective cognitive performance in Persian Gulf War veterans. Arch Clin Neuropsychol 1999; 14:531-536 · DOI

Cited by

See all 162

Metadata

Authors
Farrin, L.
Venue
Journal of Neuropsychiatry
Published
2003-02-01
Volume
15
Issue
1
Pages
98-104
ISSN
0895-0172 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2077968813
Cited by
162
References
3
FWCI
5.10
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Effects of Depressed Mood on Objective and Subjective Measures of Attention. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15.1.98
The paper
Farrin, L. (2003). Effects of Depressed Mood on Objective and Subjective Measures of Attention. Journal of Neuropsychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1176/appi.neuropsych.15.1.98

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.