The DOI matches its Crossref record; 27 of the 27 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
County-Level Estimates of Mental Health Professional Shortage in the United States
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study examined shortages of mental health professionals at the county level across the United States. A goal was to motivate discussion of the data improvements and practice standards required to develop an adequate mental health professional workforce. METHODS: Shortage of mental health professionals was conceptualized as the percentage of need for mental health visits that is unmet within a county. County-level need was measured by estimating the prevalence of serious mental illness, then combining separate estimates of provider time needed by individuals with and without serious mental illness derived from National Comorbidity Survey Replication, U.S. Census, and Medical Panel Expenditure Survey data. County-level supply data were compiled from professional associations, state licensure boards, and national certification boards. Shortage was measured for prescribers, nonprescribers, and a combination of both groups in the nation's 3,140 counties. Ordinary least-squares regression identified county characteristics associated with shortage. RESULTS: Nearly one in five counties (18%) in the nation had unmet need for nonprescribers. Nearly every county (96%) had unmet need for prescribers and therefore some level of unmet need overall. Rural counties and those with low per capita income had higher levels of unmet need. CONCLUSIONS: These findings identified widespread prescriber shortage and poor distribution of nonprescribers. A caveat is that these estimates of need were extrapolated from current provider treatment patterns rather than from a normative standard of how much care should be provided and by whom. Better data would improve these estimates, but future work needs to move beyond simply describing shortages to resolving them.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Baker, A. (2001) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192 · Cited by 10,736
Crossing the Quality Chasm: A New Health System for the 21st Century
Committee on Quality of Health Care in America (2002) · Journal For Healthcare Quality · doi:10.1111/j.1945-1474.2002.tb00463.x · Cited by 8,483
Journal of the Washington Academy of Sciences.
(1918) · The Journal of Geology · doi:10.1086/622567 · Cited by 1,707
(2000) · Age and Ageing · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.ageing.a008095 · Cited by 1,382
The US National Comorbidity Survey Replication (NCS‐R): design and field procedures
Kessler, R. C., Berglund, P., Chiu, W. T., Demler, O., Heeringa, S., Hiripi, E., Jin, R., Pennell, B., Walters, E. E., Zaslavsky, A., et al. (2004) · International Journal of Methods in Psychiatric Research · doi:10.1002/mpr.167 · Cited by 833
The prevalence and correlates of untreated serious mental illness.
(2001) · PubMed Central · Cited by 780
Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Lin, E., Simon, G., Walker, E., Unützer, J., Bush, T., Russo, J., & Ludman, E. (1999) · Archives of General Psychiatry · doi:10.1001/archpsyc.56.12.1109 · Cited by 662
Mental Health, United States, 2000: (360402004-001)
Manderscheid, R. W., & Henderson, M. J. (2001) · PsycEXTRA Dataset · doi:10.1037/e360402004-001 · Cited by 593
Peer support among individuals with severe mental illness: A review of the evidence.
Davidson, L., Chinman, M., Kloos, B., Weingarten, R., Stayner, D., & Tebes, J. K. (1999) · Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice · doi:10.1093/clipsy.6.2.165 · Cited by 579
Moving Assertive Community Treatment Into Standard Practice
Phillips, S. D., Burns, B. J., Edgar, E. R., Mueser, K. T., Linkins, K. W., Rosenheck, R. A., Drake, R. E., & McDonel Herr, E. C. (2001) · Psychiatric Services · doi:10.1176/appi.ps.52.6.771 · Cited by 443
Cited by
Hoeft, T. J., Fortney, J. C., Patel, V., & Unützer, J. (2018) · The Journal of Rural Health · doi:10.1111/jrh.12229 · Cited by 619
Videoconferencing psychotherapy: a systematic review
Backhaus, A., Agha, Z., Maglione, M. L., Repp, A., Ross, B., Zuest, D., Rice-Thorp, N. M., Lohr, J., & Thorp, S. R. (2012) · Psychological Services · doi:10.1037/a0027924 · Cited by 586
Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review
Boucher, E. M., Harake, N. R., Ward, H. E., Stoeckl, S. E., Vargas, J., Minkel, J., Parks, A. C., & Zilca, R. (2021) · Expert Review of Medical Devices · doi:10.1080/17434440.2021.2013200 · Cited by 440
Geographic Variation in the Supply of Selected Behavioral Health Providers
Andrilla, C. H. A., Patterson, D. G., Garberson, L. A., Coulthard, C., & Larson, E. H. (2018) · American Journal of Preventive Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.amepre.2018.01.004 · Cited by 419
Raviola, G., Naslund, J. A., Smith, S. L., & Patel, V. (2019) · Current Psychiatry Reports · doi:10.1007/s11920-019-1028-x · Cited by 258
Metadata
- Authors
- Thomas, K. C., Ellis, A. R., Konrad, T. R., Holzer, C. E., & Morrissey, J. P.
- Venue
- Psychiatric Services
- Published
- 2009-10
- Volume
- 60
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1323-1328
- ISSN
- 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
- 1075-2730
- 1557-9700
- OpenAlex
- W2099514322
- Cited by
- 616
- References
- 27
- FWCI
- 26.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: County-Level Estimates of Mental Health Professional Shortage in the United States. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1176/ps.2009.60.10.1323
- The paper
- Thomas, K. C., Ellis, A. R., Konrad, T. R., Holzer, C. E., & Morrissey, J. P. (2009). County-Level Estimates of Mental Health Professional Shortage in the United States. Psychiatric Services. https://doi.org/10.1176/ps.2009.60.10.1323
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.