Cited by 441Digital Mental Health InterventionsArtificial Intelligence in Healthcare and EducationSocial Robot Interaction and HRI

Artificially intelligent chatbots in digital mental health interventions: a review

Open access
Boucher, Eliane M., Harake, Nicole R., Ward, Haley E., Stoeckl, Sarah Elizabeth, Vargas, Junielly, Minkel, Jared, Parks, Acacia C., Zilca, Ran·2021·Expert Review of Medical Devices

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Increasing demand for mental health services and the expanding capabilities of artificial intelligence (AI) in recent years has driven the development of digital mental health interventions (DMHIs). To date, AI-based chatbots have been integrated into DMHIs to support diagnostics and screening, symptom management and behavior change, and content delivery. AREAS COVERED: , serves as a case study for discussion of potential challenges and how these might be addressed, and demonstrates the promise of chatbots as effective, usable, and adoptable within DMHIs. Finally, we discuss ways in which future research can advance the field, addressing topics including perceptions of AI, the impact of individual differences, and implications for privacy and ethics. EXPERT OPINION: Our discussion concludes with a speculative viewpoint on the future of AI in DMHIs, including the use of chatbots, the evolution of AI, dynamic mental health systems, hyper-personalization, and human-like intervention delivery.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/17434440.2021.2013200

Cites

116 of 116 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Relative to chatbots that do not express empathy, chatbots that express empathy lead to more favorable ratings of companionship and better mood after experiencing social exclusion.

    “Relative to chatbots that do not express empathy, chatbots that express empathy lead to more favorable ratings of companionship, i.e., the activities done together are perceived as more enjoyable or exciting (Boucher et al. 2021; Leite et al. 2013), and better mood after experiencing social exclusion (De Gennaro, Krumhuber, and Lucas 2020).”

    From AI Companions Reduce Loneliness (2024) · cites this paper as Boucher et al. 2021

  • The study of applications of AI in mental healthcare remains in its infancy.

    “However, the study of the applications of AI in mental healthcare remains in its infancy (6, 20).”
  • AI technology can help address online mental healthcare issues by supporting a versatile, scalable, powerful approach that can analyze and respond to large amounts of data and adapt to individual healthcare needs.

    “AI technology can help address these issues by supporting a versatile, scalable, and powerful approach that can analyze and respond to large amounts of data and adapt to individual healthcare needs (6, 17–23).”
  • Recent studies have shown promising results of AI applications including suicide risk assessment and risk prediction, identification of mental illness predictors, mental health monitoring, psychoeducation and psychotherapy delivery, therapist training, mental healthcare personalization, mental health triage and decision-making, and promoting treatment engagement.

    “Nevertheless, recent studies have shown promising results of AI applications including suicide risk assessment and risk prediction, identification of mental illness predictors, mental health monitoring, psychoeducation and psychotherapy delivery, therapist training, mental healthcare personalization, mental health triage and decision-making, and promoting treatment engagement (6, 17–23).”
  • Because of the novelty of AI technology, there are unanswered questions and considerations such as limitations in language interpretation, biases in interaction with patients from diverse backgrounds, and unanswered ethical, patient safety, and health policy considerations.

    “However, because of the novelty of this technology, there are several unanswered questions and considerations such as limitations in the interpretation of language, biases in the interaction with patients from diverse backgrounds, and unanswered ethical, patient safety, and health policy considerations (6, 17–23).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Boucher, E. M., Harake, N. R., Ward, H. E., Stoeckl, S. E., Vargas, J., Minkel, J., Parks, A. C., & Zilca, R.
Affiliations
Happify Health, New York, NY, USA
Corresponding author
Boucher, Eliane M.
Venue
Expert Review of Medical Devices
Published
2021-12-03
Volume
18
Issue
sup1
Pages
37-49
ISSN
  • 1743-4440 (ISSN-L)
  • 1745-2422
OpenAlex
W4200615999
Cited by
440
References
116
Citations by year
2026: 111 · 2025: 149 · 2024: 111 · 2023: 55 · 2022: 14
FWCI
40.30
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Expert Review of Medical Devices (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc-nd)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
Happify Health
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Applied Psychology › Digital Mental Health Interventions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Health Informatics › Artificial Intelligence in Healthcare and Education
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Social Robot Interaction and HRI
Keywords
chatbots, artificial intelligence, digital mental health interventions, mental health screening, symptom management, behavior change, artificial intelligence adoption, perceptions of AI, individual differences, privacy, ethics, hyper-personalization
MeSH terms
Artificial Intelligence, Humans, Mental Health

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review