Cited by 94Mental Health and Patient InvolvementPsychometric Methodologies and TestingCommunity Health and Development

Validation of the Empowerment Scale With an Outpatient Mental Health Population

Wowra, Scott A., McCarter, Robert·1999·Psychiatric Services

Abstract

The validity of the Empowerment Scale was examined in an adult outpatient mental health population. A survey was mailed to 2,000 consumers in the South Carolina outpatient public mental health system, and 283 completed surveys were received, a response rate of 16.5 percent. Reliability and factor analyses confirmed five subscales of empowerment: esteem, power, activism, anger, and control. Respondents with full-time jobs scored significantly higher on overall empowerment and on the esteem, anger, and power subscales. Respondents with college experience scored higher on overall empowerment and the power subscale. Results indicate adequate validity of the scale in this population and provide direction for research on empowerment as a process and outcome variable.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1176/ps.50.7.959

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

1 of the 6 references couldn’t be matched to a known paper.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Wowra, S. A., & McCarter, R.
Affiliations
South Carolina State Department of Mental Health (US)
Venue
Psychiatric Services
Published
1999-07
Volume
50
Issue
7
Pages
959-961
ISSN
  • 0022-1597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1075-2730
  • 1557-9700
OpenAlex
W1973733514
Cited by
94
References
6
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 5 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 3 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.83
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Psychiatric Services (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Mental Health and Patient Involvement
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Community Health and Development
Keywords
empowerment scale, empowerment, scale validation, public mental health system, esteem, power, activism, anger, control, employment, educational attainment
MeSH terms
Adult, Analysis of Variance, Mental Disorders, Factor Analysis, Statistical, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Male, Middle Aged, Power, Psychological, Psychological Tests, Psychometrics, Regression Analysis, Self Concept, South Carolina, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review