Cited by 216Schizophrenia research and treatmentMental Health and PsychiatryMental Health Treatment and Access

Quality of life in people with severe mental illness. Reliability and validity of the Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA)

Björkman, Tommy, Svensson, Bengt·2005·Nordic Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

The Manchester Short Assessment of Quality of Life (MANSA) is a short interview, which has received a recent interest in research investigating quality of life in people with mental illness. In the present study, the Swedish version of MANSA is examined with regard to reliability, in terms of internal consistency and construct validity. Ninety-two persons with severe mental illness were interviewed regarding quality of life, social network, psychosocial functioning, psychiatric symptoms, needs for care, empowerment and experiences of stigma. Internal consistency was adequate (alpha = 0.81). Positive correlations were found between MANSA and social network, empowerment and psychosocial functioning, and negative correlations with psychopathology, number of needs for care, perceived devaluation and discrimination, and rejection experiences. Social network, psychosocial functioning and beliefs of devaluation and discrimination altogether explained 67% of the variance in quality of life. The Swedish version of MANSA showed a satisfactory reliability in terms of internal consistency. The construct of validity of the scale was satisfactory insofar as associations with validation measures were of considerable magnitude and in expected directions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1080/08039480500213733

Cites

20 of 20 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Björkman, T., & Svensson, B.
Affiliations
Lund University (SE)
Corresponding author
Björkman, Tommy
Venue
Nordic Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2005-01
Volume
59
Issue
4
Pages
302-306
ISSN
  • 0029-1455 (ISSN-L)
  • 0803-9488
  • 1502-4725
OpenAlex
W2121416407
Cited by
216
References
20
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 7 · 2024: 43 · 2023: 5 · 2022: 16 · 2021: 11 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 15 · 2014: 10 · 2013: 6 · 2012: 6
FWCI
2.41
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Nordic Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Psychiatry and Mental health › Schizophrenia research and treatment
  • Social Sciences › Arts and Humanities › Philosophy › Mental Health and Psychiatry
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
Mansa, quality of life, severe mental illness, Swedish version, psychometric validation, internal consistency, construct validity, social networks, psychosocial functioning, stigma, empowerment
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Mental Disorders, Culture, Female, Follow-Up Studies, Health Services Needs and Demand, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Psychology, Quality of Life, Surveys and Questionnaires, Rejection, Psychology, Social Support, Stereotyping, Reproducibility of Results

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review