The DOI matches its Crossref record; 85 of the 85 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Parallel Play: Startups, Nascent Markets, and Effective Business-model Design
Abstract
Prior research has advanced several explanations for entrepreneurial success in nascent markets but leaves a key imperative unexplored: the business model. By studying five ventures in a nascent financial-technology market, we develop a novel theoretical framework for understanding how entrepreneurs effectively design business models: parallel play . Similar to parallel play by preschoolers, entrepreneurs engaged in parallel play interweave action, cognition, and timing to accelerate learning about a novel world. Specifically, they (1) borrow from peers and focus on established substitutes for their services or products, (2) test assumptions, then commit to a broad business-model template, and (3) pause before elaborating the activity system. The insights from our framework contribute to research on optimal distinctiveness and to the learning and evolutionary-adjustment literatures. More broadly, we blend organization theory with a fresh theoretical lens—business-model processes—to highlight how organizations actually work and create value.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
(1984) · Cited by 81,983
(1994) · Journal of the American Dietetic Association · doi:10.1016/0002-8223(94)92216-0 · Cited by 45,910
Building Theories from Case Study Research
Eisenhardt, K. M. (1989) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.2307/258557 · Cited by 17,455
Self-citationTheory Building From Cases: Opportunities And Challenges
Eisenhardt, K. M., & Graebner, M. E. (2007) · Academy of Management Journal · doi:10.5465/amj.2007.24160888 · Cited by 16,670
Self-citationMixing Qualitative and Quantitative Methods: Triangulation in Action.
Jick, T. D. (1979) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2392366 · Cited by 7,103 · cited 1×
“We focused on actions and themes drawn from multiple data sources and confirmed by several informants (Jick, 1979).”
BackgroundStrategies for Theorizing from Process Data
Langley, A. (1999) · The Academy of Management Review · doi:10.5465/amr.1999.2553248 · Cited by 7,008
The business model: Recent developments and future research
Zott, C., Amit, R., & Massa, L. (2011) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/0149206311406265 · Cited by 4,790
Chesbrough, H. (2002) · Industrial and Corporate Change · doi:10.1093/icc/11.3.529 · Cited by 4,481
Brown, S. L., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (1997) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2307/2393807 · Cited by 4,282
Self-citationCreating Something from Nothing: Resource Construction through Entrepreneurial Bricolage
Baker, T., & Nelson, R. E. (2005) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.2189/asqu.2005.50.3.329 · Cited by 4,060
Cited by
Engwall, M., Kaulio, M., Karakaya, E., Miterev, M., & Berlin, D. (2021) · Technovation · doi:10.1016/j.technovation.2021.102330 · Cited by 69
The stakeholder value proposition of digital platforms in an urban ecosystem
Carrasco-Farré, C., Snihur, Y., Berrone, P., & Ricart, J. E. (2022) · Research Policy · doi:10.1016/j.respol.2022.104488 · Cited by 54
Metadata
- Authors
- McDonald, R. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M.
- Venue
- Administrative Science Quarterly
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2019-05-24
- Volume
- 65
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 483-523
- ISSN
- 0001-8392 (ISSN-L)
- 1930-3815
- OpenAlex
- W2945063044
- Cited by
- 394
- References
- 85
- FWCI
- 54.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Parallel Play: Startups, Nascent Markets, and Effective Business-model Design. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0001839219852349
- The paper
- McDonald, R. M., & Eisenhardt, K. M. (2020). Parallel Play: Startups, Nascent Markets, and Effective Business-model Design. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839219852349
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.