Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization
Abstract
Poland represents a surprising case of democratic backsliding since the return to power of the PiS party in 2015, given that positive conditions associated with democracy are present—consistent strong per capita economic growth since 1989, moderate inequality, rising wages, strong preference for democracy, high levels of happiness, and a parliamentary system with proportional representation. The lack of strong underlying cleavages indicates the polarization was not bottom up. Instead, this article argues that polarization was driven from the top down by a segment of the political class that donned the cloak of radical populist anti-establishmentarianism to gain popular support, win an election, and rewrite the constitutional rules of the game to its own benefit. The Polish case points to the importance of elite cues, and especially the pernicious consequences of system-delegitimizing rhetoric, creating distrust in the media and institutions.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Son quienes insisten con claves de divisiones mediante la retórica contra los grupos de poder, con el objetivo de sembrar o cosechar odios y descontento contra la política y sus instituciones.
“Son quienes insisten con claves de divisiones mediante la retórica contra los grupos de poder, con el objetivo de sembrar y/o cosechar odios y descontento contra la política y sus instituciones (Tworzecki, 2019).”
From ¿Es válido atribuir la polarización política a la comunicación digital? Sobre burbujas, plataformas y polarización afectiva (2020) · cites this paper as Tworzecki, 2019
Cites
Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis
Pierson, P. (2004) · doi:10.1515/9781400841080 · Cited by 4,957 · see citing works
Boix, C. (2003) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511804960 · Cited by 2,211 · see citing works
Uncivil Agreement: How Politics Became Our Identity
Mason, L. (2018) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226524689.001.0001 · Cited by 1,985 · see citing works
Linkage versus Leverage. Rethinking the International Dimension of Regime Change
Levitsky, S., & Way, L. A. (2006) · Comparative Politics · doi:10.2307/20434008 · Cited by 384 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Waisbord, S. (2020) · REVISTA SAAP · doi:10.46468/rsaap.14.2.a1 · Cited by 93 · see citing works
- Authors
- Tworzecki, H.
- Corresponding author
- Tworzecki, Hubert
- ORCID
- Tworzecki, Hubert
- Venue
- The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2018-12-20
- Volume
- 681
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 97-119
- ISSN
- 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3349
- OpenAlex
- W2906372456
- Cited by
- 143
- References
- 4
- Citations by year
- 2026: 9 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
- FWCI
- 30.47
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
- RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Keywords
- democratic backsliding, political polarization, PiS party, radical populism, elite cues, political elites, constitutional change
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review