Cited by 143Populism, Right-Wing MovementsPolitical Theory and DemocracyElectoral Systems and Political Participation

Poland: A Case of Top-Down Polarization

Tworzecki, Hubert·2019·The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science

Abstract

Poland represents a surprising case of democratic backsliding since the return to power of the PiS party in 2015, given that positive conditions associated with democracy are present—consistent strong per capita economic growth since 1989, moderate inequality, rising wages, strong preference for democracy, high levels of happiness, and a parliamentary system with proportional representation. The lack of strong underlying cleavages indicates the polarization was not bottom up. Instead, this article argues that polarization was driven from the top down by a segment of the political class that donned the cloak of radical populist anti-establishmentarianism to gain popular support, win an election, and rewrite the constitutional rules of the game to its own benefit. The Polish case points to the importance of elite cues, and especially the pernicious consequences of system-delegitimizing rhetoric, creating distrust in the media and institutions.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0002716218809322

Cites

4 of 4 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Tworzecki, H.
Corresponding author
Tworzecki, Hubert
Venue
The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science
Published
2018-12-20
Volume
681
Issue
1
Pages
97-119
ISSN
  • 0002-7162 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3349
OpenAlex
W2906372456
Cited by
143
References
4
Citations by year
2026: 9 · 2025: 29 · 2024: 34 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 21 · 2021: 19 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 3
FWCI
30.47
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Populism, Right-Wing Movements
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Political Theory and Democracy
  • Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
Keywords
democratic backsliding, political polarization, PiS party, radical populism, elite cues, political elites, constitutional change

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review