Cited by 286Corporate Social Responsibility ReportingPolitical Influence and Corporate StrategiesEnvironmental Sustainability in Business

Social Movements, Risk Perceptions, and Economic Outcomes: The Effect of Primary and Secondary Stakeholder Activism on Firms’ Perceived Environmental Risk and Financial Performance

Vasi, Ion Bogdan, King, Brayden G.·2012·American Sociological Review

Abstract

Although risk assessments are critical inputs to economic and organizational decision-making, we lack a good understanding of the social and political causes of shifts in risk perceptions and the consequences of those changes. This article uses social movement theory to explain the effect of environmental activism on corporations’ perceived environmental risk and actual financial performance. We define environmental risk as audiences’ perceptions that a firm’s practices or policies will lead to greater potential for an environmental failure or crisis that would expose it to financial decline. Using data on environmental activism targeting U.S. firms between 2004 and 2008, we examine variation in the effectiveness of secondary and primary stakeholder activism in shaping perceptions about environmental risk. Our empirical analysis demonstrates that primary stakeholder activism against a firm affects its perceived environmental risk, which subsequently has a negative effect on the firm’s financial performance.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0003122412448796

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Reputational threats occur when stakeholders publicize organizational misdeeds and pressure the organization to rectify or take responsibility.

    “Reputational threats can occur when stakeholders recognize organizational misdeeds and bring those actions to light in an effort to pressure the organization to rectify its actions or take responsibility for its transgressions”
  • Corporations have made significant investments in environmental initiatives and green products to differentiate themselves and signal environmental consciousness.

    “they have made significant investments in environmental initiatives and green products to differentiate themselves from their competitors and to signal to the general public that they are environmentally conscious corporate citizens”
  • KLD evaluates firms' positive and negative CSR performance in areas such as community relations, diversity, employee relations, human rights, and controversial business practices.

    “KLD rates a company's positive and negative CSR performance across several domains including community relations, diversity initiatives, employee relations, human rights initiatives, and socially controversial business practices(Vasi and King, 2012;Flammer, 2015).”
  • Proactive firms characterized by a progressive corporate culture often engage in socially responsible practices outside an environmental domain and may thus be less inclined to publicize their DJSI membership.

    “proactive firms characterized by a progressive corporate culture (Vasi and King, 2012) often engage in socially responsible practices outside an environmental domain and may thus be less inclined to publicize their DJSI membership”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Vasi, I. B., & King, B. G.
Affiliations
  • Columbia University (US)
  • Northwestern University (US)
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2012-06-04
Volume
77
Issue
4
Pages
573-596
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W2133069936
Cited by
286
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 21 · 2025: 21 · 2024: 22 · 2023: 22 · 2022: 22 · 2021: 15 · 2020: 23 · 2019: 24 · 2018: 32 · 2017: 18 · 2016: 15 · 2015: 28 · 2014: 15 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 4
FWCI
48.52
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Strategy and Management › Political Influence and Corporate Strategies
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Marketing › Environmental Sustainability in Business
Keywords
social movements, environmental activism, risk perception, corporate financial performance, environmental risk

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review