The DOI matches its Crossref record; 113 of the 113 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pluralistic Collapse: The “Oil Spill” Model of Mass Opinion Polarization
Abstract
Despite widespread feeling that public opinion in the United States has become dramatically polarized along political lines, empirical support for such a pattern is surprisingly elusive. Reporting little evidence of mass polarization, previous studies assume polarization is evidenced via the amplification of existing political alignments. This article considers a different pathway: polarization occurring via social, cultural, and political alignments coming to encompass an increasingly diverse array of opinions and attitudes. The study uses 44 years of data from the General Social Survey representing opinions and attitudes across a wide array of domains as elements in an evolving belief network. Analyses of this network produce evidence that mass polarization has increased via a process of belief consolidation, entailing the collapse of previously cross-cutting alignments, thus creating increasingly broad and encompassing clusters organized around cohesive packages of beliefs. Further, the increasing salience of political ideology and partisanship only partly explains this trend. The structure of U.S. opinion has shifted in ways suggesting troubling implications for proponents of political and social pluralism.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Collective dynamics of ‘small-world’ networks
Watts, D. J., & Strogatz, S. H. (1998) · Nature · doi:10.1038/30918 · Cited by 43,060
Granovetter, M. S. (1973) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/225469 · Cited by 40,491
A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance
Festinger, L. (1957) · doi:10.1515/9781503620766 · Cited by 24,241
Birds of a Feather: Homophily in Social Networks
McPherson, M., Smith-Lovin, L., & Cook, J. M. (2001) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev.soc.27.1.415 · Cited by 18,567
Social Network Analysis: Methods and Applications
Wasserman, S., & Faust, K. (1994) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511815478 · Cited by 17,557
Centrality in social networks conceptual clarification
Freeman, L. C. (1978) · Social Networks · doi:10.1016/0378-8733(78)90021-7 · Cited by 17,062
Data Analysis Using Regression and Multilevel/Hierarchical Models
Gelman, A., & Hill, J. (2006) · doi:10.1017/cbo9780511790942 · Cited by 13,597
Modularity and community structure in networks
Newman, M. E. J. (2006) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0601602103 · Cited by 12,256
Burt, R. S. (1992) · doi:10.4159/9780674029095 · Cited by 9,093
The case for motivated reasoning.
Kunda, Z. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.108.3.480 · Cited by 9,022 · cited 1×
“…update their own beliefs and practices to maintain consistency with these mental maps and avoid cognitive strain, aggregate belief structures can be expected—at least to a modest extent—to shape individual beliefs (Festinger 1957; Goldberg and Stein 2018; Heider 1946; Hunzaker 2016; Kunda 1990).”
Background
Research works printed but not linked: 4
- Boutyline Andrei, 2017, Sociological Science, 4
- 10.2307/2579105 · DOI
- Levitsky Steven, 2018, How Democracies Die
- Marx Karl, 1978, The Marx-Engels Reader
Cited by
Sorted by citations
How digital media drive affective polarization through partisan sorting
Törnberg, P. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2207159119 · Cited by 288
“cal positions, values, and cultural preferences (21), the result is”
BackgroundMeasuring Stability and Change in Personal Culture Using Panel Data
Kiley, K., & Vaisey, S. (2020) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122420921538 · Cited by 284
“…processes of belief formation and change for a population, such as examining the association between theoretically related values (Baldassarri and Gelman 2008; Boutyline and Vaisey 2017; DellaPosta 2020) or looking at changes in the distribution of responses over time (DiMaggio et al. 1996).”
Preventing extreme polarization of political attitudes
Axelrod, R., Daymude, J. J., & Forrest, S. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2102139118 · Cited by 154
“public may increase due to the already strong affective polarization, rising social inequality, and the collapse of cross-cutting belief structures into consolidated clusters [6,7].”
BackgroundModeling the emergence of affective polarization in the social media society
Törnberg, P., Andersson, C., Lindgren, K., & Banisch, S. (2021) · PLOS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0258259 · Cited by 118
“As research using survey data has shown, this means that opinions are not so much diverging as they are becoming clustered and interlinked [77].”
MethodEvaluating Belief System Networks as a Theory of Political Belief System Dynamics
Brandt, M. J., & Sleegers, W. W. A. (2021) · Personality and Social Psychology Review · doi:10.1177/1088868321993751 · Cited by 93
“For example, evidence from the United States suggests that the political belief system in the United States is expanding to more issues and opinions over the last decades (DellaPosta, 2020; see also work on conflict extension, Layman & Carsey, 2002; Layman et al., 2010).”
BackgroundBonikowski, B., Feinstein, Y., & Bock, S. (2021) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/717103 · Cited by 88
Brüggemann, M., & Meyer, H. (2023) · Communication Theory · doi:10.1093/ct/qtad012 · Cited by 60
Transmission of Faith in Families: The Influence of Religious Ideology
Smith, J. (2020) · Sociology of Religion · doi:10.1093/socrel/sraa045 · Cited by 87
“Processes of social constraint and belief consolidation may further contribute to overlap of political and religious perspectives over time (Baldassarri and Gelman 2008; Boutyline and Vaisey 2017; DellaPosta 2020).”
BackgroundThe Polarization of Popular Culture: Tracing the Size, Shape, and Depth of the “Oil Spill”
Rawlings, C. M., & Childress, C. (2023) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soad150 · Cited by 63
“…on key issues (Baldassarri and Gelman 2008); partisans increasingly dislike each other (Iyengar et al. 2019); and individuals’ political beliefs have become more interconnected and therefore likely constrained in their ability to change (Axelrod, Daymude, and Forrest 2021; DellaPosta 2020).”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialAmengual, M., & Bartley, T. (2022) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224221092340 · Cited by 44
The Ising model celebrates a century of interdisciplinary contributions
Macy, M. W., Szymanski, B. K., & Hołyst, J. A. (2024) · npj Complexity · doi:10.1038/s44260-024-00012-0 · Cited by 40
“SimulationswithanIsing-likemodelrevealtheconsequentdestabilizingofa pluralist equilibrium, allowing pluralism to collapse into bifurcation, as has happened in the US in recent decades 47,48 .”
Sun, R., Zhu, H., & Guo, F. Q. (2022) · Decision Support Systems · doi:10.1016/j.dss.2022.113845 · Cited by 39
“Scholars identify opinion polarization as a major concern because it can lead to extremism and social chaos [23,24].”
BackgroundWiertz, D., & Lim, C. (2021) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v8.a21 · Cited by 33
Constrained Citizens? Ideological Structure and Conflict Extension in the US Electorate, 1980–2016
Hare, C. (2021) · British Journal of Political Science · doi:10.1017/s000712342100051x · Cited by 32
The Interactive Effects of Scientific Knowledge and Gender on COVID‐19 Social Distancing Compliance
Algara, C., Fuller, S., Hare, C., & Kazemian, S. (2020) · Social Science Quarterly · doi:10.1111/ssqu.12894 · Cited by 31
Rooted America: Immobility and Segregation of the Intercounty Migration Network
Huang, P., & Butts, C. T. (2023) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224231212679 · Cited by 41
“…party lines (Levendusky 2009); social cleavages by political ideology extend to a growing array of public opinions (Baldassarri and Gelman 2008; DellaPosta 2020) and life-styles (DellaPosta, Shi, and Macy 2015) and have led to segregated social networks and tensions in relationships, including…”
BackgroundLorenz, J., Neumann, M., & Schröder, T. (2021) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/rev0000291 · Cited by 48
Kawakatsu, M., Yphtach Lelkes, B., Levin, S. A., & Tarnita, C. E. (2021) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2102148118 · Cited by 29
“While some papers have argued that the decreasing dimensionality of issue attitudes (8, 9) is at the core of current political tensions, any demonstrated relationship between dimensionality reduction and polarization has been merely correlational.”
BackgroundPerceived risk, political polarization, and the willingness to follow COVID-19 mitigation guidelines
Block, R., Burnham, M., Kahn, K., Peng, R. X., Seeman, J., & Seto, C. H.-F. (2022) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2022.115091 · Cited by 29
“…rhetoric is crystallizing among citizens: conversations about the severity of COVID-19 are often bundled with preexisting partisan debates regarding the role of government (Bhanot and Hopkins, 2020; Collignon et al., 2021; DellaPosta, 2020; Gollwitzer et al., 2020; Grossman et al., 2020).”
Polarization, abstention, and the median voter theorem
Jones, M. I., Sirianni, A., & Fu, F. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01056-0 · Cited by 34
“…can result from the twin-mechanisms of homophily, a phenomenon that spans the social and biological sciences (Fu et al., 2012; McPherson et al., 2001), and social influence or the diffusion of pairs of associated beliefs (DellaPosta, 2020; DellaPosta et al., 2015; Goldberg and Stein, 2018).”
BackgroundBecoming an Ideologue: Social Sorting and the Microfoundations of Polarization
Rawlings, C. M. (2022) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v9.a13 · Cited by 29
“Such ideological labels—that is, Democrat versus Republican, but perhaps even more clearly liberal versus conservative (see Boutyline and Vaisey 2017:1413; DellaPosta et al. 2015)—have become so-called mega-identities (Finkel et al. 2020; Mason 2018:14).”
The stratification of media usage in Finland, 2007–2018: Signs of socio-political polarization?
Heikkilä, R. L. S., Leguina, A., & Purhonen, S. (2020) · New Media & Society · doi:10.1177/1461444820971612 · Cited by 32
“…polarization found in the literature, we use the concept of polarization in a simple sociological sense to refer to a temporal process regarding whether social and political differentiation of media usage has become more sharply pronounced over time (e.g. DellaPosta, 2020; DiMaggio et al., 1996).”
MethodBaldassarri, D., & de Jong, J. (2025) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v12.a18 · Cited by 24
“…trait of affective polarization is that it extends to domains of life that would generally be considered removed from politics, such as health-related decisions to wear a mask or get vaccinated (Druckman et al. 2021) and possibly lifestyles (DellaPosta, Shi, and Macy 2015; DellaPosta 2020).”
Munger, K. (2024) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781009359795 · Cited by 26
Wojcieszak, M., von Hohenberg, B. C., Casas, A., Menchen-Trevino, E., de Leeuw, S., Gonçalves, A., & Boon, M. (2022) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-022-01423-x · Cited by 27
“…climate in many countries, when citizens’ political identities are constantly activated (Settle, 2018) and when numerous ostensibly non-political issues and events become associated with politics (DellaPosta, 2020), it may be increasingly difficult to shift individual opinions and beliefs.”
BackgroundStrategies for reducing polarization in social networks
Wu, Y., Li, L., Yu, Q., Gan, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023) · Chaos Solitons & Fractals · doi:10.1016/j.chaos.2022.113095 · Cited by 22
Wicked Crises and the (In)capacity to Act
Meyer, R. E. (2025) · Administrative Science Quarterly · doi:10.1177/00018392251363998 · Cited by 21
“The growing followership of con-spiracy theories (Rao & Greve, 2024; Sutton & Douglas, 2020) and evidence that social sorting encompasses more and more previously apolitical areas of life (DellaPosta, 2020) point in this direction.”
Cognitive Authority and the Constraint of Attitude Change in Groups
Rawlings, C. M. (2020) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/0003122420967305 · Cited by 25
“To date, attitude constraint has been inferred in cross-sectional surveys by examining the alignment of attitudes within groups (e.g., Baldassarri and Bearman 2007; DellaPosta 2020).”
BackgroundInfluentialMoral reframing increases support for economically progressive candidates
Voelkel, J. G., Mernyk, J. S., & Willer, R. (2023) · PNAS Nexus · doi:10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad154 · Cited by 22
The Influence of Simmel on American Sociology Since 1975
Broćić, M., & Silver, D. (2021) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-090320-033647 · Cited by 18
Partisan Polarization of Childhood Vaccination Policies, 1995‒2020
Estep, K., Muse, A., Sweeney, S., & Goldstein, N. D. (2022) · American Journal of Public Health · doi:10.2105/ajph.2022.306964 · Cited by 18
Party, Race, and Neutrality: Investigating the Interdependence of Attitudes toward Social Groups
Brensinger, J., & Sotoudeh, R. (2022) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224221135797 · Cited by 20
“…century have conceptualized political beliefs in network terms (Converse 1964) and have recently begun to study the structure of such beliefs inductively using network analytic methods (Baldassarri and Goldberg 2014; Boutyline and Vaisey 2017; DellaPosta 2020; DiMaggio and Goldberg 2018).”
MethodLocal Edge Dynamics and Opinion Polarization
Bhalla, N., Lechowicz, A., & Musco, C. (2023) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3539597.3570442 · Cited by 21
“there is increasing concern about the ability of these platforms to polarize and divide us [3, 14, 18, 20, 23].”
Analytic Advances in Social Networks and Health in the Twenty-First Century
Chapman, A., Verdery, A. M., & Moody, J. W. (2022) · Journal of Health and Social Behavior · doi:10.1177/00221465221086532 · Cited by 18
“Although not tied explicitly to health, a growing share of this research emphasizes the overlap, or not, of value systems among various subpopulations (DellaPosta 2020; DellaPosta, Shi, and Macy 2015).”
BackgroundSpälti, A. K., Lyons, B. A., Stoeckel, F., Stöckli, S., Szewach, P., Mérola, V., Stednitz, C., González, P. L., & Reifler, J. (2023) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625231154131 · Cited by 17
“As such, it is possible that anti-vaccine beliefs may “contaminate” other domains in an “oil-spill” model of belief consolidation (DellaPosta, 2020), or that they represent a larger latent construct around health misperceptions.”
BackgroundReligious belief alignment: The structure of cultural beliefs from adolescence to emerging adulthood
Keskintürk, T. (2021) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2021.101591 · Cited by 18
What’s Not to Like? Facebook Page Likes Reveal Limited Polarization in Lifestyle Preferences
Praet, S., Guess, A. M., Tucker, J. A., Bonneau, R., & Nagler, J. (2022) · Political Communication · doi:10.1080/10584609.2021.1994066 · Cited by 22
“Such a process is suggested by the “oil spill” model of polarization, in which clusters of initially disparate issues – including cultural and moral issues – become connected in a belief system (DellaPosta, 2020).”
BackgroundUnderstanding Cultural Non-Participation in an Egalitarian Context
Heikkilä, R. L. S. (2022) · Palgrave studies in cultural participation · doi:10.1007/978-3-031-18865-7 · Cited by 16
van Noord, J., Turner-Zwinkels, F. M., Kesberg, R., Brandt, M. J., Easterbrook, M. J., Kuppens, T., & Spruyt, B. (2024) · European Sociological Review · doi:10.1093/esr/jcae011 · Cited by 20
The Sociology of Interpretation
Goldberg, A., & Singell, M. H. (2024) · Annual Review of Sociology · doi:10.1146/annurev-soc-020321-030515 · Cited by 22
Goff, K., Silver, E., & Iceland, J. (2022) · Socius Sociological Research for a Dynamic World · doi:10.1177/23780231221110277 · Cited by 17
“MFT was developed to better understand political polarization (Haidt 2012; cf. Morson and Shapiro 2021), but polarization cuts across political, religious, and other ideological affiliations (DellaPosta 2020; Whitehead and Perry 2020).”
BackgroundReducing Cross-Topic Political Homogenization in Content-Based News Recommendation
Shivaram, K., Liu, P., Shapiro, M. A., Bilgic, M., & Culotta, A. (2022) · ACM Conference on Recommender Systems (RecSys) · doi:10.1145/3523227.3546782 · Cited by 18
Smith, J. (2024) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.13014 · Cited by 15
The organization of political belief networks: A cross-country analysis
Keskintürk, T. (2022) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2022.102742 · Cited by 17
Statistical Mechanics of Political Polarization
Kaufman, M., Kaufman, S., & Diep, H. T. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24091262 · Cited by 15
“According to [2], polarization results from individuals forming “broad and encompassing clusters organized around cohesive packages of beliefs”.”
BackgroundReaching the bubble may not be enough: news media role in online political polarization
Kobellarz, J. K., Broćić, M., Graeml, A. R., Silver, D., & Silva, T. H. (2022) · EPJ Data Science · doi:10.1140/epjds/s13688-022-00357-3 · Cited by 18
“Growing distance between partisans, whether in their attitudes, lifestyles, or relations, has eroded the cross-ties that once tempered partisan conflict [8].”
BackgroundImagined otherness fuels blatant dehumanization of outgroups
van Loon, A., Goldberg, A., & Srivastava, S. B. (2024) · Communications Psychology · doi:10.1038/s44271-024-00087-4 · Cited by 20
“Bymanymeasures,theAmericanpoliticalspherehasbecome increasinglypolarizedinrecentdecades 69,70 , especially among political elites 71,72 .”
Inequality Belief Systems: What They Look Like, How to Study Them, and Why They Matter
Bertero, A., Franetovic, G., & Mijs, J. J. B. (2024) · Social Indicators Research · doi:10.1007/s11205-024-03352-5 · Cited by 11
“More recently, DellaPosta (2020) expanded belief network analysis to study the dynamics of belief networks.”
Heikkilä, R. L. S., & Katainen, A. (2021) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00380261211014467 · Cited by 11
“Daniel DellaPosta (2020) has recently used the metaphor of an ‘oil spill’ to illustrate how moral and political divisions have not only become more accentuated but also started to bring along with them many areas of life, such as choices or tastes for food, clothing or music, that were…”
MethodAesthetic Style: How Material Objects Structure an Institutional Field
Adler, G. J., DellaPosta, D., & Lankes, J. (2022) · Sociological Theory · doi:10.1177/07352751221076864 · Cited by 11
“…analysis, where co-occurrence relations among objects, words, beliefs, products, and other cultural symbols are represented as networks to show how these relationships cohere in larger systems of meaning (e.g., Boutyline and Vaisey 2017; DellaPosta 2020; DiMaggio 2011; Pachucki and Breiger 2010).”
BackgroundSelf-citationValidating Argument-Based Opinion Dynamics with Survey Experiments
Banisch, S., & Shamon, H. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5305 · Cited by 13
Political Speech from Corporate America: Sparse, Mostly for Democrats, and Somewhat Representative
Barari, S. (2024) · Journal of Quantitative Description Digital Media · doi:10.51685/jqd.2024.icwsm.5 · Cited by 9
Partisan styles of self-presentation in U.S. Twitter bios
Essig, L. W., & DellaPosta, D. (2024) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-023-50810-0 · Cited by 11
“The broadening of partisan divisions to incorporate an ever-wider array of previously apolitical topics lends a strong degree of truth to partisan stereotypes of “latte liberals” and “country music conservatives” 12,13,22 .”
Self-citationRaymond, C. W., & Gill, V. T. (2025) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224251347285 · Cited by 9
“…interaction” (Baldassarri and Bearman 2007:785) by highlighting the on-the-ground mechanisms through which mass public opinion becomes (and, in some cases, remains) polarized, especially through belief consolidation (DellaPosta 2020) and interpersonal influence (Baldassarri and Bearman 2007).”
La forza delle comunità locali
Bellanca, N. (2023) · Studi e saggi · doi:10.36253/979-12-215-0177-3 · Cited by 8
Scaduto, G., & Negri, F. (2024) · South European Society & Politics · doi:10.1080/13608746.2024.2411539 · Cited by 7
“According to the ‘Oil-spill model’ (DellaPosta 2020), polarization unfolds by leading political opinions to align with a broader set of preferences, spilling over to cultural fields.”
United States Women and Pornography: Methodological Experiment Update
Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. (2025) · Archives of Sexual Behavior · doi:10.1007/s10508-024-03075-1 · Cited by 8
“…consumption) are available (e.g., in secondary data), they should still be utilized as they produce directionally expected (see Wright, 2011, 2014, 2020) correlations with U.S. women’s sexual attitudes and behaviors that (in the aggregate–see present study’s meta-analysis results as well as…”
InfluentialWhat Explains Country-Level Differences in Political Belief System Coherence?
Warncke, P. (2025) · Political Behavior · doi:10.1007/s11109-025-10015-9 · Cited by 10
“By comparing belief system networks across 38 countries based on data from ten waves of the European Social Surveys (2002–2020), this paper reveals that national-level belief systems are characterized by substantially large differences in overall constraint, 1 and that these differences remain…”
Basu, S. (2024) · European Journal of Humour Research · doi:10.7592/ejhr.2024.12.1.833 · Cited by 8
Beyond The God Gap: Mapping Religiopolitical Heterogeneity in the United States1
Smith, J. V. (2022) · Sociological Forum · doi:10.1111/socf.12801 · Cited by 9
Zafeiris, A. (2022) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e24091320 · Cited by 9
“In these models, a node is “an element of a person’s belief system” [59], which the related literature names slightly differently, such as “opinions” [49], “concepts” [62] “attitudes” [49, 59, 64], “beliefs” [62, 50, 59], or “positions” [63, 64].”
BackgroundMethodInfluentialPolarization and Persuasion: Engaging Sociology in the Moral Universe of a Divided Democracy
Downey, D. J. (2022) · Sociological Perspectives · doi:10.1177/07311214221124443 · Cited by 7
“Daniel DellaPosta, Yongren Shi, and Michael Macy (2015) explain how that happens and the resulting social structure: “[T]he self-reinforcing dynamics of homophily and influence dramatically amplify even very small elective affinities between lifestyle and ideology, producing a stereotypical world of ‘latte liberals’ a…”
BackgroundInfluentialKyoi, S., & Mori, K. (2023) · World Development Sustainability · doi:10.1016/j.wds.2023.100118 · Cited by 7
Jaidka, K., Fischer, S., Yphtach Lelkes, B., & Wang, Y. (2023) · The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science · doi:10.1177/00027162231217873 · Cited by 7
“At the individual level, if local sociopolitical issues are increasingly interpreted through a hyperpartisan, nationalized lens (DellaPosta 2020), then local readers are less aware of their civic and economic ties to rural areas, leaving them with fewer opportunities to find common ground with…”
BackgroundU.S. Males and Pornography: Replication and Experimental Extension
Wright, P. J., & Tokunaga, R. (2024) · Health Communication · doi:10.1080/10410236.2024.2389354 · Cited by 7
“The pornography, sexual attitude, and sexual behavior measures used by P. J. Wright (2013) are listed and described in Table 2 (including the GSS names for the measures, as is common among GSS analysts – Davis, 2013; DellaPosta, 2020; Hammond, 1986).”
Do Stubborn Users Always Cause More Polarization and Disagreement? A Mathematical Study
Shirzadi, M., & Zehmakan, A. N. (2025) · ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM) · doi:10.1145/3701551.3703510 · Cited by 7
Su, L., & Li, X. (2020) · International Communication Gazette · doi:10.1177/1748048520984029 · Cited by 7
“The U.S. audience have become more and more polarized in opinion and expression, and the gap between the liberals and conservatives in the U.S. is growing due to political ideology and partisanship (DellaPosta, 2020; PewResearchCenter, 2020).”
BackgroundMoral Reframing Increases Support for Economically Progressive CandidatesPreprint
Voelkel, J. G., Mernyk, J. S., & Willer, R. (2020) · PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/mtfjn · Cited by 8
Overton, J., & Cunningham, G. (2025) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2025.103234 · Cited by 3
Are economists overconfident? Ideology and uncertainty in expert opinion
Kozlowski, A. C., & Gunten, T. S. V. (2023) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.13001 · Cited by 10
Heikkilä, R. L. S., & Sirkka, O. (2023) · International Journal of Cultural Policy · doi:10.1080/10286632.2023.2272841 · Cited by 8
“This division largely reflects the idea of political lifestyle polarisation and the connection between political and cultural attitudes in the Global North (DellaPosta 2020; Flanagan and Lee 2003).”
Schweighofer, S., & García, D. (2024) · Journal of Artificial Societies and Social Simulation · doi:10.18564/jasss.5323 · Cited by 9
“It is also consistent with the observation that issue alignment has increasedamongtheUSelectorateoverthelastdecades(Kozlowski&Murphy2021;DellaPosta2020),inparallel to an increase in hostile feelings towards political opponents (Mason 2015).”
ResultResponse Item Network (ResIN): A network-based approach to explore attitude systems
Carpentras, D., Lueders, A., & Quayle, M. (2024) · Humanities and Social Sciences Communications · doi:10.1057/s41599-024-03037-x · Cited by 6
“While social network methods usually try to provide a structure of the social connections among the studied population, belief networks provide information about the structural organization of belief systems (Boutyline and Vaisey, 2017; DellaPosta, 2020; Brandt et al. 2019; Kertzer et al. 2019).”
InfluentialPoliticultural Linking: Inferences Between Political and Apolitical Traits
Scaduto, G. (2025) · Public Opinion Quarterly · doi:10.1093/poq/nfaf047 · Cited by 6
“…and lifestyle preferences, addressing it with several different expressions, such as “lifestyle politics” (DellaPosta, Shi, and Macy 2015), “politicultural sorting” (Rogers 2022), “the oil-spill” (DellaPosta 2020; Rawlings and Childress 2024), and “lifestyle polarization” (Talaifar et al. 2024).”
Islam and the Transmission of Cultural Identity in Four European Countries
Karim, S. M. (2024) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soae076 · Cited by 6
How to divide people with things: division entrepreneurs, wedges, and the Delta Smelt controversy
Scoville, C. (2024) · American Journal of Cultural Sociology · doi:10.1057/s41290-024-00212-0 · Cited by 5
The Preparedness Paradox in Climate Attitudes: Democrats Worry, Republicans Prepare
Rivera-Kientz, K., & Stewart, E. M. (2024) · Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2024.2417386 · Cited by 4
“The political polarization of other climate attitudes suggests that preparedness actions may be politically polarized in the same way (DellaPosta 2020; Salil, Azevedo, and Holman 2022).”
Dacey, T., & Stewart, E. M. (2022) · Sociological Inquiry · doi:10.1111/soin.12511 · Cited by 5
Researching Attitude–Identity Dynamics to Understand Social Conflict and Change
Lueders, A., Quayle, M., Maher, P. J., Bliuc, A., & MacCarron, P. (2024) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.3022 · Cited by 7
Political Polarisation on Social Media: Competing Understandings of Democracy in Turkey
Türkoğlu, D., Odabaş, M., Tunaoglu, D., & Yavaş, M. (2022) · South European Society & Politics · doi:10.1080/13608746.2023.2200901 · Cited by 7
“Polarisation also influences the political culture wherein an increasing number of citizens accept undemocratic measures against dissent and political pluralism becomes increasingly hard to maintain (DellaPosta 2020).”
BackgroundMorselli, D., Durrheim, K. L., Beramendi, M., Sepahpour‐Fard, M., Mafunda, M. C., Torres, A. M., Ohamadike, N., Quayle, M., & Schuld, M. (2025) · European Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1002/ejsp.70038 · Cited by 5
Grant, D., Jorgenson, A. K., Longhofer, W., & Vasi, I. B. (. (2025) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/00031224251396518 · Cited by 4
“…to examine the environmental consequences of affective polarization, partly because it has been framed as a feature of interpersonal life, influencing friendships, dating, and marriage (Iyengar and Krupenkin 2018; Iyengar et al. 2019; see also DellaPosta 2020; Hahl, Kim, and Zuckerman Sivan 2018).”
Young, D. J., Ackland, J., Kapounek, A., Madsen, J. K., Greening, L. J., & de‐Wit, L. (2026) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.251428 · Cited by 5
Tang, C., Yue, D., Fu, W., Hu, Z., Xu, X., Guo, Y., & Tian, H. (2024) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2024.102515 · Cited by 4
Subjective Political Polarization
Kwon, H., & Martin, J. J. (2023) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v10.a32 · Cited by 4
“First, although formal analyses of culture (Mohr 1998; Martin 2002; Baldassarri and Goldberg 2014; Boutyline and Vaisey 2017; DellaPosta 2020) at identifying general patterns from the data (e.g., latent class analysis), here we have deductively formulated an analytically meaningful patterning of…”
BackgroundRees, M. E., & Saguy, A. C. (2024) · Social Forces · doi:10.1093/sf/soae069 · Cited by 5
“…studies have shown that public discourse around issues of gender and sexuality has become more polarized over time (Baldassarri and Gelman 2008; DellaPosta 2020; Finkel et al. 2020), in-depth interviews with eighty-five activists highlighted some surprising convergence in how US activists on…”
InfluentialYoung, D. J., Madsen, J. K., & de‐Wit, L. (2025) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2025.106126 · Cited by 4
“Furthermore, it is unknown whether Bayesian belief polarization processes contribute to the real-world increases in political issue polarization that have been well-documented in the US (DellaPosta, 2020; Dimock et al., 2014; Webster & Abramowitz, 2017).”
An Agent-Based Statistical Physics Model for Political Polarization: A Monte Carlo Study
Diep, H. T., Kaufman, M., & Kaufman, S. (2023) · Entropy · doi:10.3390/e25070981 · Cited by 5
“Polarization stems from individuals forming broad and encompassing clusters organized around cohesive packages of polotical beliefs [2].”
BackgroundHolding a Position: Public Opinion as Cognition in a Disorganized Field
Boutyline, A. (2022) · Poetics · doi:10.1016/j.poetic.2022.101710 · Cited by 5
Response Item Network (ResIN): A network-based approach to explore attitude systemsPreprint
Carpentras, D., Lueders, A., & Quayle, M. (2021) · doi:10.31234/osf.io/uzdcg · Cited by 4
Divided Dems, United Reps: Party strategy and within-party variation in immigration attitudesPreprint
Bock, S. (2020) · SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) · doi:10.31235/osf.io/3atq7 · Cited by 4
Lindner, T., Daenekindt, S., de Koster, W., & van der Waal, J. (2024) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.13078 · Cited by 3
Elite polarization — The boon and bane of democracy: Evidence from thirty democracies
Seimel, A. (2024) · Electoral Studies · doi:10.1016/j.electstud.2024.102801 · Cited by 4
Mahmutović, M., & Lovec, M. (2024) · Javnost - The Public · doi:10.1080/13183222.2024.2383903 · Cited by 3
“…of the digital as arena of the public sphere in which even political fi gures do not shy away from utilising initially apolitical characteristics, such as taste in music, leisure, or aesthetic choices as signals for more profound beliefs and preferences thus politicising them (DellaPosta 2020).”
Cultural and opinion dynamics in small-world “social” networks
Lee, Y. (2024) · Journal of Mathematical Sociology · doi:10.1080/0022250x.2024.2423941 · Cited by 3
“…a higher chance, the two conditions can also generate even more extreme polarization, which is in line with the current findings of partisan polarization in apolitical issues (e.g., latte-drinking liberals vs bird-hunting conservatives) (DellaPosta, 2020; DellaPosta et al., 2015; Shi et al., 2017).”
Lönnqvist, J., Leikas, S., & Walkowitz, G. (2025) · Frontiers in Social Psychology · doi:10.3389/frsps.2025.1467884 · Cited by 3
Verhaal, J. C., Reis, S., & Khessina, O. M. (2025) · Journal of Management · doi:10.1177/01492063251359947 · Cited by 5
“Sociologists have explored how changes in the propensity of individuals to increasingly dislike and distrust members of opposing political parties affect society (DellaPosta, 2020).”
Charismatic authority and fractured polities: A cross‐national analysis
Davis, A. P., & Vila‐Henninger, L. A. (2021) · British Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1111/1468-4446.12841 · Cited by 7
The Structure, Prevalence, and Nature of Mass Belief Systems
Bakker, B. N., & Yphtach Lelkes, B. (2022) · Cambridge University Press eBooks · doi:10.1017/9781108779104.007 · Cited by 3
The organization of ethnocultural attachments among second- generation Germans
Karim, S. M. (2023) · Social Science Research · doi:10.1016/j.ssresearch.2023.102959 · Cited by 3
Metadata
- Authors
- DellaPosta, D.
- Affiliations
- Pennsylvania State University (US)
- Corresponding author
- DellaPosta, Daniel
- ORCID
- DellaPosta, Daniel
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-06
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 507-536
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W3034108861
- Semantic Scholar
- 866357ade0b940c5aa010a94bd27d7287d4132a0
- Cited by
- 219
- References
- 113
- Citations by year
- 2026: 31 · 2025: 53 · 2024: 46 · 2023: 27 · 2022: 32 · 2021: 20 · 2020: 9
- FWCI
- 76.65
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Political Science and International Relations › Electoral Systems and Political Participation
- Physical Sciences › Physics and Astronomy › Statistical and Nonlinear Physics › Opinion Dynamics and Social Influence
- Social Sciences › Communication › Social Media and Politics
- Keywords
- Bayesian networks, political ideology, partisanship, pluralism, opinion change, General Social Survey
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review