Does Schooling Decrease Socioeconomic Inequality in Early Achievement? A Differential Exposure Approach
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Does schooling affect socioeconomic inequality in educational achievement? Earlier studies based on seasonal comparisons suggest schooling can equalize social gaps in learning. Yet recent replication studies have given rise to skepticism about the validity of older findings. We shed new light on the debate by estimating the causal effect of 1st-grade schooling on achievement inequality by socioeconomic family background in Germany. We elaborate a differential exposure approach that estimates the effect of exposure to 1st-grade schooling by exploiting (conditionally) random variation in test dates and birth dates for children who entered school on the same calendar day. We use recent data from the German NEPS to test school-exposure effects for a series of learning domains. Findings clearly indicate that 1st-grade schooling increases children’s learning in all domains. However, we do not find any evidence that these schooling effects differ by children’s socioeconomic background. We conclude that, although all children gain from schooling, schooling has no consequences for social inequality in learning. We discuss the relevance of our findings for sociological knowledge on the role of schooling in the process of stratification and highlight how our approach complements seasonal comparison studies.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
The effects of early education found by Cornelissen and Dustmann (2019) are particularly large for English boys from low socioeconomic backgrounds, though in German data Passaretta and Skopek (2021) do not observe differences by socioeconomic background.
“The effects of early education found by Cornelissen and Dustmann (2019) are particularly large for English boys from low socioeconomic backgrounds, though in the German data, Passaretta and Skopek (2021) do not observe differences in the effect of the first year of schooling by socioeconomic background.”
From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Passaretta and Skopek (2021)
Cites
Are Schools the Great Equalizer? Cognitive Inequality during the Summer Months and the School Year
Downey, D. B., von Hippel, P. T., & Broh, B. A. (2004) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240406900501 · Cited by 853 · see citing works
Lasting Consequences of the Summer Learning Gap
Alexander, K. L., Entwisle, D. R., & Olson, L. S. (2007) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.1177/000312240707200202 · Cited by 763 · see citing works
Secondary School Tracking and Educational Inequality: Compensation, Reinforcement, or Neutrality?
Gamoran, A., & Mare, R. D. (1989) · American Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1086/229114 · Cited by 663 · cited 1× · see citing works
“…view on schools stems from the idea that children from high socioeconomic status (SES) families benefit from between- and within-school differences, for example, in terms of teacher quality, curriculum differentiation, and tracking (Gamoran and Mare 1989; Marks, Cresswell, and Ainley 2006).”
BackgroundThe Effect of Schooling on Cognitive Skills
Carlsson, M., Dahl, G. B., Öckert, B., & Rooth, D.-O. (2015) · Review of Economics and Statistics · doi:10.1162/rest_a_00501 · Cited by 260 · see citing works
von Hippel, P., & Hamrock, C. (2019) · Sociological Science · doi:10.15195/v6.a3 · Cited by 149 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Blanden, J., Doepke, M., & Stuhler, J. (2022) · National Bureau of Economic Research · doi:10.3386/w29979 · Cited by 47 · see citing works
- Authors
- Passaretta, G., & Skopek, J.
- Affiliations
- European University Institute (IT)
- Trinity College Dublin
- Corresponding author
- Passaretta, Giampiero
- Venue
- American Sociological Review
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2021-11-01
- Volume
- 86
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1017-1042
- ISSN
- 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
- 1939-8271
- OpenAlex
- W3209189268
- Cited by
- 51
- References
- 5
- Citations by year
- 2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10
- FWCI
- 13.19
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Locations
- American Sociological Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
- Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
- Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
- Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Funders
- Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (822330)
- Topics
- Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
- Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
- Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
- Keywords
- schooling effects, educational stratification, differential exposure, birth date effects, early childhood learning, social background
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review