Cited by 51School Choice and PerformanceIntergenerational and Educational Inequality StudiesEarly Childhood Education and Development

Does Schooling Decrease Socioeconomic Inequality in Early Achievement? A Differential Exposure Approach

Open access
Passaretta, Giampiero, Skopek, Jan·2021·American Sociological Review

Published version of a preprint

Abstract

Does schooling affect socioeconomic inequality in educational achievement? Earlier studies based on seasonal comparisons suggest schooling can equalize social gaps in learning. Yet recent replication studies have given rise to skepticism about the validity of older findings. We shed new light on the debate by estimating the causal effect of 1st-grade schooling on achievement inequality by socioeconomic family background in Germany. We elaborate a differential exposure approach that estimates the effect of exposure to 1st-grade schooling by exploiting (conditionally) random variation in test dates and birth dates for children who entered school on the same calendar day. We use recent data from the German NEPS to test school-exposure effects for a series of learning domains. Findings clearly indicate that 1st-grade schooling increases children’s learning in all domains. However, we do not find any evidence that these schooling effects differ by children’s socioeconomic background. We conclude that, although all children gain from schooling, schooling has no consequences for social inequality in learning. We discuss the relevance of our findings for sociological knowledge on the role of schooling in the process of stratification and highlight how our approach complements seasonal comparison studies.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/00031224211049188

Cites

5 of 5 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The effects of early education found by Cornelissen and Dustmann (2019) are particularly large for English boys from low socioeconomic backgrounds, though in German data Passaretta and Skopek (2021) do not observe differences by socioeconomic background.

    “The effects of early education found by Cornelissen and Dustmann (2019) are particularly large for English boys from low socioeconomic backgrounds, though in the German data, Passaretta and Skopek (2021) do not observe differences in the effect of the first year of schooling by socioeconomic background.”

    From Educational Inequality* (2022) · cites this paper as Passaretta and Skopek (2021)

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Passaretta, G., & Skopek, J.
Affiliations
  • European University Institute (IT)
  • Trinity College Dublin
Corresponding author
Passaretta, Giampiero
Venue
American Sociological Review
Published
2021-11-01
Volume
86
Issue
6
Pages
1017-1042
ISSN
  • 0003-1224 (ISSN-L)
  • 1939-8271
OpenAlex
W3209189268
Cited by
51
References
5
Citations by year
2026: 12 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 10 · 2023: 10 · 2022: 10
FWCI
13.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • American Sociological Review (publishedVersion, cc-by)
  • Cadmus - EUI Research Repository (European University Institute) (submittedVersion, public-domain)
  • Iris (University of Trento) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Repositori digital de la UPF (Universitat Pompeu Fabra) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
  • SocArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
Funders
Horizon 2020 Framework Programme (822330)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Education › School Choice and Performance
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Intergenerational and Educational Inequality Studies
  • Social Sciences › Education › Early Childhood Education and Development
Keywords
schooling effects, educational stratification, differential exposure, birth date effects, early childhood learning, social background

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review