The DOI matches its Crossref record; 133 of the 133 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics
Open accessAbstract
The ubiquitous pollution of the environment with microplastics, a diverse suite of contaminants, is of growing concern for science and currently receives considerable public, political, and academic attention. The potential impact of microplastics in the environment has prompted a great deal of research in recent years. Many diverse methods have been developed to answer different questions about microplastic pollution, from sources, transport, and fate in the environment, and about effects on humans and wildlife. These methods are often insufficiently described, making studies neither comparable nor reproducible. The proliferation of new microplastic investigations and cross-study syntheses to answer larger scale questions are hampered. This diverse group of 23 researchers think these issues can begin to be overcome through the adoption of a set of reporting guidelines. This collaboration was created using an open science framework that we detail for future use. Here, we suggest harmonized reporting guidelines for microplastic studies in environmental and laboratory settings through all steps of a typical study, including best practices for reporting materials, quality assurance/quality control, data, field sampling, sample preparation, microplastic identification, microplastic categorization, microplastic quantification, and considerations for toxicology studies. We developed three easy to use documents, a detailed document, a checklist, and a mind map, that can be used to reference the reporting guidelines quickly. We intend that these reporting guidelines support the annotation, dissemination, interpretation, reviewing, and synthesis of microplastic research. Through open access licensing (CC BY 4.0), these documents aim to increase the validity, reproducibility, and comparability of studies in this field for the benefit of the global community.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The MIQE guidelines: minimum information for publication of quantitative real-time PCR experiments
Bustin, S. A., Benes, V., Garson, J. A., Hellemans, J., Huggett, J., Kubista, M., Mueller, R., Nolan, T., Pfaffl, M. W., Shipley, G. L., et al. (2009) · Clinical Chemistry · doi:10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797 · Cited by 16,303 · cited 1×
“Other fields, like molecular biology, 34 proteomics, 35 and transcriptomics, 36 already have highly successful examples of reporting guidelines that have been widely adopted by their field, and we hope this work serves a similar purpose in our field.”
Lost at sea: where is all the plastic?
Thompson, R. C., Olsen, Y., Mitchell, R. P., Davis, A., Rowland, S. J., John, A. W. G., McGonigle, D., & Russell, A. E. (2004) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1094559 · Cited by 7,765
van Den Dool, H., & Dec. Kratz, P. (1963) · Journal of Chromatography A · doi:10.1016/s0021-9673(01)80947-x · Cited by 6,439
Hidalgo-Ruz, V., Gutow, L., Thompson, R. C., & Thiel, M. (2012) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/es2031505 · Cited by 5,440
1,500 scientists lift the lid on reproducibility
Baker, M. (2016) · Nature · doi:10.1038/533452a · Cited by 4,209
Minimum information about a microarray experiment (MIAME)-toward standards for microarray data
Brazma, A., Hingamp, P., Quackenbush, J., Sherlock, G., Spellman, P., Stoeckert, C., Aach, J., Ansorge, W., Ball, C. A., Causton, H. C., et al. (2001) · Nature Genetics · doi:10.1038/ng1201-365 · Cited by 4,109
Horton, A. A., Walton, A., Spurgeon, D. J., Lahive, E., & Svendsen, C. (2017) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.01.190 · Cited by 3,756
Human Consumption of Microplastics
Cox, K. D., Covernton, G. A., Davies, H. L., Dower, J. F., Juanes, F., & Dudas, S. E. (2019) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.9b01517 · Cited by 2,745
Microplastics in Freshwaters and Drinking Water: Critical Review and Assessment of Data Quality
Koelmans, A. A., Mohamed Nor, N. H., Hermsen, E., Kooi, M., Mintenig, S. M., & De France, J. (2019) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2019.02.054 · Cited by 2,535
Li, J., Liu, H., & Paul Chen, J. (2018) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2017.12.056 · Cited by 2,314
Research works printed but not linked: 6
- Schwabl P., 2018, United Eur. Gastroenterol J, 6, A127
- W. Cowger, A.B. Gray, M. Eriksen, C. Moore, M. Thiel. “Evaluating Wastewater Effluent as a Source of Microplastics in Environmental Samples”. In: H.K. Karapanagioti, I.K. Kalavrouziotis, editors. Microplastics in Water and Wastewater. London: IWA Publishing, 2019. Chap. 8, Pp. 109–131. · doi:10.2166/9781789061697_0109
- Martin K.M., 2018, J. Vis. Exp, 137
- Rowshyra A., 2014, NRC Press, 88, 5
- Ghosal S., 2017, Environ. Pollut, 33, 1113
- Rochman C.M., 2013, Environ. Sci. Technol, 47, 1646
Cited by
Detection of microplastics in human lung tissue using μFTIR spectroscopy
Jenner, L. C., Rotchell, J. M., Bennett, R. T., Cowen, M., Tentzeris, V., & Sadofsky, L. R. (2022) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.154907 · Cited by 1,536
Brander, S. M., Renick, V. C., Foley, M. M., Steele, C., Woo, M., Lusher, A., Carr, S., Helm, P., Box, C., Cherniak, S., et al. (2020) · Applied Spectroscopy · doi:10.1177/0003702820945713 · Cited by 389
Self-citationWeathering plastics as a planetary boundary threat: exposure, fate, and hazards
Arp, H. P. H., Kühnel, D., Rummel, C., MacLeod, M., Potthoff, A., Reichelt, S., Rojo-Nieto, E., Schmitt-Jansen, M., Sonnenberg, J., Toorman, E., et al. (2021) · Environmental Science & Technology · doi:10.1021/acs.est.1c01512 · Cited by 322
Athey, S. N., & Erdle, L. M. (2022) · Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry · doi:10.1002/etc.5173 · Cited by 289
Schymanski, D., Oßmann, B. E., Benismail, N., Boukerma, K., Dallmann, G., von der Esch, E., Fischer, D., Fischer, F., Gilliland, D., Glas, K., et al. (2021) · Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry · doi:10.1007/s00216-021-03498-y · Cited by 280
Metadata
- Authors
- Cowger, W., Booth, A. M., Hamilton, B. M., Thaysen, C., Primpke, S., Munno, K., Lusher, A. L., Dehaut, A., Vaz, V. P., Liboiron, M., Devriese, L. I., Hermabessiere, L., Rochman, C., Athey, S. N., Lynch, J. M., De Frond, H., Gray, A., Jones, O. A. H., Brander, S., Steele, C., Moore, S., Sanchez, A., & Nel, H.
- Venue
- Applied Spectroscopy
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2020-06-12
- Volume
- 74
- Issue
- 9
- Pages
- 1066-1077
- ISSN
- 0003-7028 (ISSN-L)
- 1943-3530
- OpenAlex
- W3024245531
- Cited by
- 462
- References
- 133
- FWCI
- 11.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Update notices
- correction (2020-10-29)
- Open access
- hybrid
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0003702820930292
- The paper
- Cowger, W., Booth, A. M., Hamilton, B. M., Thaysen, C., Primpke, S., Munno, K., Lusher, A. L., Dehaut, A., Vaz, V. P., Liboiron, M., Devriese, L. I., Hermabessiere, L., Rochman, C., Athey, S. N., Lynch, J. M., De Frond, H., Gray, A., Jones, O. A. H., Brander, S., . . . Nel, H. (2020). Reporting Guidelines to Increase the Reproducibility and Comparability of Research on Microplastics. Applied Spectroscopy. https://doi.org/10.1177/0003702820930292
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
