Cited by 43Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality ControlPatient Safety and Medication ErrorsBacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing

The role of European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group for Preanalytical Phase in standardization and harmonization of the preanalytical phase in Europe

Open access
Cornes, Michael P, Church, Stephen, van Dongen-Lases, Edmée, Grankvist, Kjell, Guimarães, João T, Ibarz, Mercedes, Kovalevskaya, Svetlana, Kristensen, Gunn BB +6 more·2016·Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine

Abstract

Patient safety is a leading challenge in healthcare and from the laboratory perspective it is now well established that preanalytical errors are the major contributor to the overall rate of diagnostic and therapeutic errors. To address this, the European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (EFLM WG-PRE) was established to lead in standardization and harmonization of preanalytical policies and practices at a European level. One of the key activities of the WG-PRE is the organization of the biennial EFLM-BD conference on the preanalytical phase to provide a forum for National Societies (NS) to discuss their issues. Since 2012, a year after the first Preanalytical phase conference, there has been a rapid growth in the number of NS with a working group engaged in preanalytical phase activities and there are now at least 19 countries that have one. As a result of discussions with NS at the third conference held in March 2015 five key areas were identified as requiring harmonisation. These were test ordering, sample transport and storage, patient preparation, sampling procedures and management of unsuitable specimens. The article below summarises the work that has and will be done in these areas. The goal of this initiative is to ensure the EFLM WG-PRE produces work that meets the needs of the European laboratory medicine community. Progress made in the identified areas will be updated at the next preanalytical phase conference and show that we have produced guidance that has enhanced standardisation in the preanalytical phase and improved patient safety throughout Europe.

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004563216643969

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Research works printed but not linked: 1

  1. [8]8. Simundic AM. Avoiding titanic errors. In: The pathologist. Knutsford, UK: Texere Publishing Ltd, 2015, pp.18-27.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Cornes, M. P., Church, S., van Dongen-Lases, E., Grankvist, K., Guimarães, J. T., Ibarz, M., Kovalevskaya, S., Kristensen, G. B., Lippi, G., Nybo, M., Sprongl, L., Sumarac, Z., Simundic, A.-M., & on behalf of the Working Group for Preanalytical Phase (WG-PRE) and European Federation of Clinical Chemistry and Laboratory Medicine (EFLM)
Affiliations
  • New Cross Hospital (GB)
  • BD Life Sciences – Preanalytical Systems, Oxford, UK
  • Department of Clinical Chemistry, Academic Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
  • Umeå University (SE)
  • Universidade do Porto (PT)
  • Laboratori Clínic Hospital Arnau de Vilanova, Lleida, Spain
  • First Pavlov State Medical University of St. Petersburg (RU)
  • The Norwegian EQA Program (NKK), Bergen, Norway
  • University of Verona (IT)
  • Odense University Hospital (DK)
  • Central Laboratory, Hospital Sumperk, Sumperk, Czech Republic
  • Center for Medical Biochemistry, Clinical Center of Serbia, Belgrade, Serbia
  • Department of Medical Laboratory Diagnostics, Clinical Hospital Sveti Duh, Zagreb, Croatia
Venue
Annals of Clinical Biochemistry: International Journal of Laboratory Medicine
Published
2016-07-20
Volume
53
Issue
5
Pages
539-547
ISSN
  • 0004-5632 (ISSN-L)
  • 1758-1001
OpenAlex
W2344061850
Cited by
43
References
46
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 8 · 2017: 9 · 2016: 1
FWCI
0.93
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Annals of Clinical Biochemistry International Journal of Laboratory Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • University of Southern Denmark Research Portal (University of Southern Denmark) (publishedVersion)
  • Pure Amsterdam UMC (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS) (submittedVersion)
  • Portuguese National Funding Agency for Science, Research and Technology (RCAAP Project by FCT) (submittedVersion)
  • INFM-OAR (INFN Catania) (submittedVersion, other-oa)
  • Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research) (other-oa)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Clinical Laboratory Practices and Quality Control
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Emergency Medical Services › Patient Safety and Medication Errors
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Clinical Biochemistry › Bacterial Identification and Susceptibility Testing
Keywords
pre-analytical phase, pre-analytical errors, standardization, harmonization, patient safety, test ordering, sample storage and transport, patient preparation, sampling methods, national societies, diagnostic errors
MeSH terms
Blood Chemical Analysis, Chemistry, Clinical, Europe, Humans, Reference Standards, Societies, Medical, Practice Guidelines as Topic

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review