Cited by 15Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingEthics and bioethics in healthcare

Capacity of forensic patients to consent to treatment

Skipworth, Jeremy J, Dawson, John, Ellis, Pete M·2013·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Lack of capacity to consent to psychiatric treatment has been promoted as a better basis for compulsion than mental disorder plus risk of harm. Previous research has examined how that legal change would affect acutely unwell inpatients. There is little research on forensic patients. This research aimed to assess capacity to consent in forensic patients at different stages of recovery and to consider the implications of respecting their competent treatment decisions. METHOD: Capacity to consent was assessed in a cross-sectional sample of 109 forensic patients both in hospital and in community settings. RESULTS: The majority of participants (67.6%) had treatment-related decision-making capacity. Very few patients with capacity refused treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Change to a capacity-based legal approach may alter treatment for some forensic patients but would not necessarily increase risk of harm to others. The implications for release decisions are less clear.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867412468495

Cites

18 of 18 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Skipworth, J. J., Dawson, J., & Ellis, P. M.
Affiliations
  • Waitemata District Health Board (NZ)
  • University of Otago (NZ)
  • Department of Psychological Medicine, University of Otago, Wellington, New Zealand
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2012-11-21
Volume
47
Issue
5
Pages
443-450
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2331435405
Cited by
15
References
18
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 2
FWCI
2.18
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Ethics and bioethics in healthcare
Keywords
forensic patients, capacity to consent, psychiatric treatment, involuntary treatment, decision-making capacity, treatment refusal, release decisions, recovery
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Cross-Sectional Studies, Decision Making, Female, Humans, Informed Consent, Inpatients, Male, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review