Cited by 44Healthcare Decision-Making and RestraintsPsychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual OffendingCriminal Law and Policy

Functional mental capacity is not independent of the severity of psychosis

Rutledge, Emer, Kennedy, Miriam, O'Neill, Helen, Kennedy, Harry G.·2008·International Journal of Law and Psychiatry

Abstract

Background Function-specific mental capacities are the legal criteria for competence. These are regarded as superior to clinical assessments of mental state and general function.Aims To determine whether tests of fitness to plead and capacity to consent are independent of each other and independent of mental state and global function in psychosis.Method The MacCAT-T and MacCAT-FP, PANSS and GAF were administered to 102 compulsorily detained forensic patients with psychosis. Criteria for incompetence were inability to express a preference concerning treatment, and independent rating as unfit to plead.Results MacCAT-T, MacCAT-FP totals and sub-scales correlated with each other and with PANSS and GAF. Those independently rated unfit to plead or who were incapable of making a treatment choice scored significantly worse on all rating scales. No test had satisfactory sensitivity or specificity.Conclusions Legal definitions of mind and of functional capacity offer a basis for structured clinical judgement regarding decision-making capacity. However, function-specific measures of understanding, reasoning and appreciation generate much the same results as measures of mental state and global functioning.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/j.ijlp.2007.11.002

Cites

19 of 19 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Around 25% of patients were unable to express a choice between two medications or no treatment.

    “Regarding the ability to decide between two medications or no treatment, around 25% of patients were unable to express a choice (Dornan et al., 2015;Kennedy et al., 2009;Rutledge et al., 2008)”
  • Being able to express a choice was significantly associated with better global functioning, lower positive symptoms and overall psychopathology.

    “Through nonparametric analysis, being able to express a choice was also significantly associated with better global functioning (Kennedy et al., 2009;Rutledge et al., 2008), as well as lower positive symptoms and overall psychopathology (Kennedy et al., 2009;Rutledge et al., 2008).”
  • Low global functioning predicted incapacity in four studies.

    “Finally, low global functioning predicted incapacity in four studies (Dornan et al., 2015;Kennedy et al., 2009;Rutledge et al., 2008;Tor et al., 2020).”

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Rutledge, E., Kennedy, M., O'Neill, H., & Kennedy, H. G.
Affiliations
Central Mental Hospital (IE)
Corresponding author
Kennedy, Harry G.
Venue
International Journal of Law and Psychiatry
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2008-01
Volume
31
Issue
1
Pages
9-18
ISSN
0160-2527 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2005077180
Cited by
44
References
19
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 8 · 2021: 2 · 2020: 4 · 2019: 4 · 2017: 3 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.72
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • International Journal of Law and Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Healthcare Decision-Making and Restraints
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Psychopathy, Forensic Psychiatry, Sexual Offending
  • Social Sciences › Sociology and Political Science › Criminal Law and Policy
Keywords
psychosis, fitness to plead, capacity to consent, decision-making capacity, forensic psychiatry, compulsory detention, PANSS, Global Assessment of Functioning, legal competence, sensitivity and specificity
MeSH terms
Adult, Choice Behavior, Cognition, Hospitals, Psychiatric, Humans, Interviews as Topic, Ireland, Psychotic Disorders, Severity of Illness Index, Mental Competency

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review