Cited by 37Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesMental Health Treatment and Access

What do 1000 smokers with mental illness say about their tobacco use?

Ashton, Maxie, Rigby, Ashlee, Galletly, Cherrie·2013·Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine what motivates smokers with mental illness to participate in a smoking cessation or reduction programme and to report their attendance and cessation rates. METHOD: A group programme was provided to assist smokers with mental illness to cease or reduce their use of tobacco. People who registered to address their tobacco use completed a questionnaire which included information about their mental health, tobacco use, and what they wanted to achieve by attending the programme. RESULTS: A total of 1043 smokers living with mental illness contacted the programme and asked for help to address their tobacco use between 2000 and 2011. At the first contact they were smoking an average of 27.4 cigarettes per day and had been smoking for 23.8 years, and 87% said they wanted to quit tobacco and a further 10% wanted to smoke less: 85% said they were concerned about the effect that smoking tobacco was having on their health, 56% were concerned for financial reasons, and nearly half (47.6%) said that they were concerned about both their physical health and their financial situation. In Adelaide, 148 Tobacco Free programmes were provided by mental health services. Of those who attended at least one session and completed an evaluation at the end of the programme, 22.5% reported not smoking. Most remained motivated to continue to address their tobacco use and many registered for a further programme. CONCLUSIONS: Many smokers living with serious mental illness are concerned about the impact of tobacco use on their health and finances and are motivated to address it. Group treatment programmes specifically designed for these people can achieve good cessation rates and should be readily accessible to all smokers with mental illness.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0004867413482008

Cites

22 of 22 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Ashton, M., Rigby, A., & Galletly, C.
Affiliations
  • Adelaide Health Service, Mental Health Directorate, Department for Health and Ageing, Adelaide, Australia
  • Ramsay Health Care (Australia) (AU)
Venue
Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry
Published
2013-03-14
Volume
47
Issue
7
Pages
631-636
ISSN
  • 0004-8674 (ISSN-L)
  • 1440-1614
OpenAlex
W2122685367
Cited by
37
References
22
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2022: 1 · 2021: 4 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 2 · 2018: 3 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 6 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4
FWCI
4.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Adelaide Research & Scholarship (AR&S) (University of Adelaide) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Mental Health Treatment and Access
Keywords
smoking cessation, tobacco use, severe mental illness, motivation to quit, health concerns, mental health services
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Female, Humans, Male, Mental Health Services, Middle Aged, Motivation, Surveys and Questionnaires, Smoking, Tobacco Use Disorder, Smoking Cessation

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review