Cited by 158Smoking Behavior and CessationSubstance Abuse Treatment and OutcomesSuicide and Self-Harm Studies

Smoking and quitting: a qualitative study with community-living psychiatric clients

Lawn, Sharon J, Pols, Rene G, Barber, James G·2002·Social Science & Medicine

Abstract

This paper reports the findings of a study investigating the smoking behaviours of a community-based psychiatric population. Using a qualitative, grounded theory approach, the four diagnostic categories of schizophrenia, bi-polar affective disorder, depression, and personality disorder were studied (24 interviews in total) in order to identify similarities and differences in smoking behaviours and perceptions of links between illness and cigarette smoking. A number of theoretical constructs emerged from the data, many of which confirm and enhance current understandings of issues, such as the role of cigarettes in managing the symptoms of illness. However, several themes not found in the existing literature also emerged. Smoking was found to play a significant existential role in the lives of participants: alleviating the effects of stigma, promoting positive and negative freedoms, and providing core needs as part of quality of life decisions. Perceptions of the nature and degree of interaction between psychiatric symptoms and the 'need' to smoke were also found to be significant. Variations in smoking between the different diagnostic groups were also found, in particular in the process of smoking itself the nature of the nicotine dependence as predominantly physical or psychological, attitudes towards the quitting process and sense of control, and the degree of significance of existential factors. The research findings suggest that we may be able to add new methods to our cur…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1016/s0277-9536(01)00008-9

Cites

6 of 6 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Lawn, S. J., Pols, R. G., & Barber, J. G.
Affiliations
Flinders University (AU)
Corresponding author
Lawn, Sharon J
Venue
Social Science & Medicine
Publisher
Elsevier BV
Published
2002-01
Volume
54
Issue
1
Pages
93-104
ISSN
0277-9536 (ISSN-L)
OpenAlex
W2094526733
Cited by
158
References
6
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 6 · 2019: 8 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 12 · 2015: 11 · 2014: 7 · 2013: 11 · 2012: 9
FWCI
3.19
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Social Science & Medicine (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RePEc: Research Papers in Economics (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Physiology › Smoking Behavior and Cessation
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Epidemiology › Substance Abuse Treatment and Outcomes
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Clinical Psychology › Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Keywords
smoking, smoking cessation, psychiatric patients, schizophrenia, bipolar disorder, depression, personality disorders, nicotine dependence, symptom management, stigma, community-dwelling patients, quality of life
MeSH terms
Adult, Mental Disorders, Community Mental Health Services, Female, Humans, Internal-External Control, Interviews as Topic, Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice, Male, Middle Aged, Motivation, Self Concept, Self Medication, Smoking, South Australia, Health Behavior, Smoking Cessation, Behavior, Addictive, Persons with Psychiatric Disorders

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review