The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Short Note: The Sociology of Professional Groups: New Directions
Abstract
This article is not a critique of the Sciulli article (2005) but, instead, indicates some current and contemporary research questions about professionalism considered to be important to researchers in the field from North America, Europe and worldwide. The article begins by offering an alternative, more pragmatic, view of the definitional question and argues that most researchers have accepted definitional uncertainty and moved on. Current research questions include a reappraisal and reassessment of professionalism as a normative value – and a move away from market closure as the dominant paradigm. In addition, there are new directions in the analysis that focus on the discourse of professionalism as a mechanism for the control of work and workers.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The System of Professions: An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor
Abbott, A. (1988) · doi:10.7208/chicago/9780226189666.001.0001 · Cited by 7,733
Miller, P., & Rose, N. (1990) · Economy and Society · doi:10.1080/03085149000000001 · Cited by 2,877 · cited 1×
“Using these ideas in her interpretation of professionalism as a disciplinary mechanism, Fournier (1999), following Miller and Rose (1990), has explored professionalism as the control of professional practice ‘at a distance’.”
BackgroundThe Appeal to ‘Professionalism’ as a Disciplinary Mechanism
Fournier, V. (1999) · The Sociological Review · doi:10.1111/1467-954x.00173 · Cited by 779
Cited by
Parmar, N., Dong, L., & Eisingerich, A. B. (2018) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/10109 · Cited by 116
Social media and dentistry: some reflections on e-professionalism
Neville, P., & Waylen, A. (2015) · British Dental Journal · doi:10.1038/sj.bdj.2015.294 · Cited by 91
Situated Trust in a Physician: Patient Health Characteristics and Trust in Physician Confidentiality
Campos-Castillo, C., & Anthony, D. (2019) · The Sociological Quarterly · doi:10.1080/00380253.2018.1547174 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Evetts, J.
- Venue
- Current Sociology
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2006-01
- Volume
- 54
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 133-143
- ISSN
- 0011-3921 (ISSN-L)
- 1461-7064
- OpenAlex
- W2133637117
- Cited by
- 335
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 9.25
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
