The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Measuring Attraction to Organizations
Abstract
Organizational attractionmeasures are commonly used as surrogate assessments of organizational pursuit. Despite the range in content often encompassed by such instruments, no research has systematically examined the assumptions underlying their use. The authors address this issue by empirically distinguishing items assessing attractiveness, prestige, and behavioral intentions and by modeling their effects on organization pursuit. Undergraduates ( N= 305) were randomly assigned to recruitment literature from one of five wellknown companies and were asked to respond to a series of items commonly used in past research. Analyses of the itemresponses suggested that three components of organizational attraction can be reliably distinguished and that their relation to organization-pursuit behavior corresponds to Fishbein and Ajzen’s theory of reasoned action.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Hu, L., & Bentler, P. M. (1999) · Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal · doi:10.1080/10705519909540118 · Cited by 108,788
Alternative Ways of Assessing Model Fit
Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1992) · Sociological Methods & Research · doi:10.1177/0049124192021002005 · Cited by 27,200
Structural model evaluation and modification: An interval estimation approach
Steiger, J. H. (1990) · Multivariate Behavioral Research · doi:10.1207/s15327906mbr2502_4 · Cited by 7,408
LaPiere, R. T. (1934) · Social Forces · doi:10.2307/2570339 · Cited by 1,720
Cited by
Chapman, D. S., Uggerslev, K. L., Carroll, S. A., Piasentin, K. A., & Jones, D. A. (2005) · Journal of Applied Psychology · doi:10.1037/0021-9010.90.5.928 · Cited by 1,182
Highly automated job interviews: Acceptance under the influence of stakes
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Papathanasiou, M. (2019) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12246 · Cited by 203
Langer, M., König, C. J., & Fitili, A. (2018) · Computers in Human Behavior · doi:10.1016/j.chb.2017.11.036 · Cited by 119
Job seekers' attitudes toward cybervetting: Scale development, validation, and platform comparison
Cook, R., Jones‐Chick, R., Roulin, N., & O'Rourke, K. (2020) · International Journal of Selection and Assessment · doi:10.1111/ijsa.12300 · Cited by 42
Hunkenschroer, A. (2021) · AI Ethics Journal · doi:10.47289/aiej20210716-3 · Cited by 18
Metadata
- Authors
- Highhouse, S., Lievens, F., & Sinar, E. F.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2003-12
- Volume
- 63
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 986-1001
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2031468639
- Cited by
- 849
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 10.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
