The DOI matches its Crossref record; 5 of the 5 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Shorter can Also be Better: The Abridged Job in General Scale
Abstract
The Job Descriptive Index family of job attitude measures includes the Job in General (JIG) scale, a measure of global satisfaction with one’s job. The scale was originally developed and validated by Ironson, Smith, Brannick, Gibson, and Paul. Following structured scale reduction procedures developed by Stanton, Sinar, Balzer, and Smith, the current authors developed an abridged version of the JIG for use by practitioners and researchers of organizational behavior. They report the results of three validation studies documenting the process of scale reduction and the psychometric suitability of the reduced-length scale.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development.
Clark, L. A., & Watson, D. (1995) · Psychological Assessment · doi:10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 · Cited by 6,567
Mathieu, J. E., & Zajac, D. M. (1990) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037//0033-2909.108.2.171 · Cited by 6,449
The job satisfaction–job performance relationship: A qualitative and quantitative review.
Judge, T. A., Thoresen, C. J., Bono, J. E., & Patton, G. K. (2001) · Psychological Bulletin · doi:10.1037/0033-2909.127.3.376 · Cited by 4,760
Organizational Behavior: Affect in the Workplace
Brief, A. P., & Weiss, H. M. (2002) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135156 · Cited by 1,797
What i think and feel: A revised measure of children's manifest anxiety
Reynolds, C. R., & Richmond, B. O. (1978) · Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology · doi:10.1007/bf00919131 · Cited by 1,741
Cited by
Expressed humility in organizations: Implications for performance, teams, and leadership
Owens, B. P., Johnson, M. D., & Mitchell, T. R. (2013) · Organization Science · doi:10.1287/orsc.1120.0795 · Cited by 927
Leader–member exchange (LMX), job autonomy, and creative work involvement
Volmer, J., Spurk, D., & Niessen, C. (2012) · The Leadership Quarterly · doi:10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.10.005 · Cited by 417
(2009) · Cited by 355
Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., Compare, A., Zangeneh, M., & Griffiths, M. D. (2015) · Mindfulness · doi:10.1007/s12671-014-0368-1 · Cited by 268
Shonin, E., Van Gordon, W., Dunn, T. J., Singh, N. N., & Griffiths, M. D. (2014) · International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction · doi:10.1007/s11469-014-9513-2 · Cited by 192
Metadata
- Authors
- Russell, S. S., Spitzmüller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H.
- Venue
- Educational and Psychological Measurement
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2004-10
- Volume
- 64
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 878-893
- ISSN
- 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-3888
- OpenAlex
- W2042014690
- Cited by
- 209
- References
- 5
- FWCI
- 5.24
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Shorter can Also be Better: The Abridged Job in General Scale. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1177/0013164404264841
- The paper
- Russell, S. S., Spitzmüller, C., Lin, L. F., Stanton, J. M., Smith, P. C., & Ironson, G. H. (2004). Shorter can Also be Better: The Abridged Job in General Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013164404264841
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
