Cited by 770Motivation and Self-Concept in SportsJob Satisfaction and Organizational BehaviorPsychometric Methodologies and Testing

The Motivation at Work Scale: Validation Evidence in Two Languages

Gagné, Marylène, Forest, Jacques, Gilbert, Marie-Hélène, Aubé, Caroline, Morin, Estelle, Malorni, Angela·2010·Educational and Psychological Measurement

Abstract

The Motivation at Work Scale (MAWS) was developed in accordance with the multidimensional conceptualization of motivation postulated in self-determination theory. The authors examined the structure of the MAWS in a group of 1,644 workers in two different languages, English and French. Results obtained from these samples suggested that the structure of motivation at work across languages is consistently organized into four different types: intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, and external regulation. The MAWS subscales were predictably associated with organizational behavior constructs. The importance of this new multidimensional scale to the development of new work motivation research is discussed.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1177/0013164409355698

Cites

15 of 15 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • The resulting 20-item human resources practices scale had a reliability of 0.87.

    “The resulting 20-item scale had a reliability of 0.87, which is comparable to the one that Takeuchi and colleagues [52] obtained for their HR system scale (0.90).”

    From The Temporary Agency Worker’s Motivation Profile Analysis (2021) · cites this paper as [52]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Gagné, M., Forest, J., Gilbert, M.-H., Aubé, C., Morin, E., & Malorni, A.
Affiliations
  • Concordia University (CA)
  • Université du Québec à Montréal (CA)
  • Université de Montréal (CA)
  • HEC Montréal (CA)
Corresponding author
Gagné, Marylène
Venue
Educational and Psychological Measurement
Published
2010-01-21
Volume
70
Issue
4
Pages
628-646
ISSN
  • 0013-1644 (ISSN-L)
  • 1552-3888
OpenAlex
W2021930444
Cited by
770
References
15
Citations by year
2026: 48 · 2025: 65 · 2024: 57 · 2023: 74 · 2022: 73 · 2021: 61 · 2020: 58 · 2019: 57 · 2018: 62 · 2017: 41 · 2016: 39 · 2015: 34 · 2014: 37 · 2013: 31 · 2012: 21
FWCI
27.55
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Educational and Psychological Measurement (publishedVersion)
  • UWA Profiles and Research Repository (UWA) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Psychology › Social Psychology › Motivation and Self-Concept in Sports
  • Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior
  • Social Sciences › Decision Sciences › Management Science and Operations Research › Psychometric Methodologies and Testing
Keywords
employee motivation, self-determination theory, intrinsic motivation, identified regulation, introjected regulation, external regulation, scale validation, cross-cultural measurement, organizational behavior

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review