The DOI matches its Crossref record; 43 of the 43 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Pro-Environmental Behavior Triggers Moral Inference, Not Licensing by Observers
Open accessPublished version of a preprint
Abstract
Several studies have shown that moral licensing by observers makes observers more lenient in their judgment of subsequent immoral behaviors committed by a person. Environmental behavior is generally perceived as moral behavior, but it is not known whether it can trigger moral licensing by observers. In two pre-registered experimental laboratory studies ( N 1 = 198, N 2 = 501), we have tested whether prior engagement in pro-environmental behavior triggers licensing by observers and thus makes observers judge more positively actors’ subsequent immoral behavior (Study 1) and their subsequent anti- and pro-environmental behaviors (Study 2). We found that people engaging in pro-environmental behavior were subsequently rated as more pro-environmental and moral, and their subsequent pro- and anti-environmental behaviors (but not outright immoral behavior) were rated as more moral by observers. As these effects also concern subsequent pro-environmental behaviors, they are broader than what licensing theory suggests.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Citations
Cites
Random effects structure for confirmatory hypothesis testing: Keep it maximal
Barr, D. J., Levy, R., Scheepers, C., & Tily, H. J. (2013) · Journal of Memory and Language · doi:10.1016/j.jml.2012.11.001 · Cited by 10,328
The processes of causal attribution.
Kelley, H. H. (1973) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/h0034225 · Cited by 4,025 · cited 1×
“This observation is in line with the notion that repeated behavior is more likely to lead to dispositional attribution (e.g., Kelley, 1973).”
ResultApplying the Rasch Model: Fundamental Measurement in the Human Sciences
Espejo, M. R. (2004) · Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A (Statistics in Society) · doi:10.1111/j.1467-985x.2004.t01-2-.x · Cited by 2,001
Jones, E. E., & Harris, V. A. (1967) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/0022-1031(67)90034-0 · Cited by 1,783 · cited 1×
“These observations attest to the tendency of people to make character judgments based on limited information about morally significant events (Malle, 2021), one of the manifestations of the fundamental attribution error (Jones & Harris, 1967).”
BackgroundDo Green Products Make Us Better People?
Mažar, N., & Zhong, C. (2010) · Psychological Science · doi:10.1177/0956797610363538 · Cited by 1,022
Skowronski, J. J., & Carlston, D. E. (1987) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.52.4.689 · Cited by 939
Moral character predominates in person perception and evaluation.
Goodwin, G. P., Piazza, J. R., & Rozin, P. N. (2013) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/a0034726 · Cited by 927
On the Dominance of Moral Categories in Impression Formation
Wojciszke, B., Bazińska, R., & Jaworski, M. (1998) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/01461672982412001 · Cited by 757
A schematic model of dispositional attribution in interpersonal perception.
Reeder, G. D., & Brewer, M. B. (1979) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/0033-295x.86.1.61 · Cited by 723
Social roles, social control, and biases in social-perception processes.
Ross, L. D., Amabile, T. M., & Steinmetz, J. L. (1977) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/0022-3514.35.7.485 · Cited by 541
Striving for the Moral Self: The Effects of Recalling Past Moral Actions on Future Moral Behavior
Jordan, J., Mullen, E., & Murnighan, J. K. (2011) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167211400208 · Cited by 521
Miller, D. T., & Effron, D. A. (2010) · Advances in experimental social psychology · doi:10.1016/s0065-2601(10)43003-8 · Cited by 378
Berger, J. L. (2019) · Journal of Consumer Behaviour · doi:10.1002/cb.1760 · Cited by 284
Moral dilemmas and moral rules
Nichols, S., & Mallon, R. (2005) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2005.07.005 · Cited by 283
Malle, B. F. (2020) · Annual Review of Psychology · doi:10.1146/annurev-psych-072220-104358 · Cited by 260
Letting People Off the Hook: When Do Good Deeds Excuse Transgressions?
Effron, D. A., & Monin, B. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210385922 · Cited by 199
Opotow, S., & Weiss, L. (2000) · Journal of Social Issues · doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00179 · Cited by 192
Can Unintended Side Effects Be Intentional? Resolving a Controversy Over Intentionality and Morality
Guglielmo, S., & Malle, B. F. (2010) · Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin · doi:10.1177/0146167210386733 · Cited by 166
Moral signals, public outrage, and immaterial harms
Tannenbaum, D., Uhlmann, E. L., & Diermeier, D. A. (2011) · Journal of Experimental Social Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2011.05.010 · Cited by 146
Investigating the Neural and Cognitive Basis of Moral Luck: It’s Not What You Do but What You Know
Young, L., Nichols, S., & Saxe, R. R. (2010) · Review of Philosophy and Psychology · doi:10.1007/s13164-010-0027-y · Cited by 145
Gholamzadehmir, M., SPARKS, P. B., & Farsides, T. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.101334 · Cited by 135
Deconstructing intent to reconstruct morality
Cushman, F. A. (2015) · Current Opinion in Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.copsyc.2015.06.003 · Cited by 130
The Effectiveness of Accounts Following Transgression
Riordan, C. A., Marlin, N. A., & Kellogg, R. T. (1983) · Social Psychology Quarterly · doi:10.2307/3033792 · Cited by 118
Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. R. (2019) · European Psychologist · doi:10.1027/1016-9040/a000364 · Cited by 116
Garvey, A. M., & Bolton, L. E. (2017) · Journal of Public Policy & Marketing · doi:10.1509/jppm.16.096 · Cited by 106
Morality judgment: Test of an averaging model with differential weights.
Birnbaum, M. H. (1973) · Journal of Experimental Psychology · doi:10.1037/h0035216 · Cited by 103
Urban, J., Bahník, Š., & Kohlová, M. B. (2019) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2019.01.011 · Cited by 99
Self-citationTwo paths to blame: Intentionality directs moral information processing along two distinct tracks.
Monroe, A. E., & Malle, B. F. (2017) · Journal of Experimental Psychology General · doi:10.1037/xge0000234 · Cited by 91
The Psychology of Motivated versus Rational Impression Updating
Kim, M. J., Park, B., & Young, L. (2020) · Trends in Cognitive Sciences · doi:10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.001 · Cited by 76
Why we forgive what can’t be controlled
Martin, J. W., & Cushman, F. A. (2015) · Cognition · doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2015.11.008 · Cited by 71
Moral balance: The effect of prior behaviour on decision in moral conflict
Nisan, M., & Horenczyk, G. (1990) · British Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.1111/j.2044-8309.1990.tb00884.x · Cited by 71
Luomala, H., Puska, P., Lähdesmäki, M., Siltaoja, M. E., & Kurki, S. (2019) · Appetite · doi:10.1016/j.appet.2019.104492 · Cited by 69
Behavioral norms for condensed moral vignettes
Knutson, K. M., Krueger, F., Koenigs, M., Hawley, A., Escobedo, J. R., Vasudeva, V., Adolphs, R., & Grafman, J. (2010) · Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience · doi:10.1093/scan/nsq005 · Cited by 66
Martin, J. W., & Cushman, F. A. (2015) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0125193 · Cited by 57
Buy green, gain prestige and social status
Kohlová, M. B., & Urban, J. (2020) · Journal of Environmental Psychology · doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2020.101416 · Cited by 55
Self-citationKrumm, A. J., & Corning, A. F. (2008) · The Journal of Social Psychology · doi:10.3200/socp.148.6.689-710 · Cited by 50
Does Organic Food Consumption Signal Prosociality?: An Application of Schwartz’s Value Theory
Puska, P. (2018) · Journal of Food Products Marketing · doi:10.1080/10454446.2018.1522286 · Cited by 49
Meijers, M. H. C., Noordewier, M. K., Verlegh, P. W. J., Zebregs, S., & Smit, E. G. (2018) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916518773148 · Cited by 41
No Evidence of Within-Domain Moral Licensing in the Environmental Domain
Urban, J., Braun Kohlová, M., & Bahník, Š. (2021) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916520942604 · Cited by 26
Self-citationLaurent, S. M., Clark, B. A., & Schweitzer, K. A. (2014) · Journal of Personality and Social Psychology · doi:10.1037/pspa0000011 · Cited by 25
GEB-50. General Ecological Behavior Scale
Kaiser, F. G. (2020) · doi:10.23668/psycharchives.3453 · Cited by 20
Wang, R., & Chan, D. K.-S. (2019) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00484 · Cited by 19
Vranka, M. A., & Bahník, Š. (2016) · Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie) · doi:10.1027/1618-3169/a000325 · Cited by 6
Self-citation
Cited by
Yuan, S., Li, F., Browning, M. H. E. M., Bardhan, M., Zhang, K., McAnirlin, O., Patwary, M. M., & Reuben, A. (2024) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1295275 · Cited by 17
Urban, J., & Duda, E. (2024) · International Journal of Sociology · doi:10.1080/00207659.2024.2376985 · Cited by 9
Self-citationSelf-serving beliefs about science: Science justifies my weaknesses (but not other people’s)
Cruz, F., & Mata, A. (2024) · Public Understanding of Science · doi:10.1177/09636625241261320 · Cited by 9
Mustafa, S., Long, Y., Jamil, K., & Wang, X. (2025) · Scientific Reports · doi:10.1038/s41598-025-17252-2 · Cited by 8
Li, C., Wang, X., & Wang, L. (2024) · Energy & Environment · doi:10.1177/0958305x241251405 · Cited by 8
Metadata
- Authors
- Urban, J., Bahník, Š., & Braun Kohlová, M.
- Affiliations
- Charles University, Prague, Czech Republic
- Prague University of Economics and Business (CZ)
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 2023-01
- Volume
- 55
- Issue
- 1-2
- Pages
- 74-98
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W4353066327
- Semantic Scholar
- a85b85c909808acbf8941132cab3b8b5a6a41d73
- Cited by
- 18
- References
- 43
- Citations by year
- 2026: 8 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 5
- FWCI
- 3.20
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- hybrid
- doi.org
- Licence
- Locations
- Environment and Behavior (publishedVersion, cc-by-nc)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- PsyArXiv (OSF Preprints) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law › Pro-Environmental Behavior and Attitudes
- Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cognitive Neuroscience › Psychology of Moral and Emotional Judgment
- Social Sciences › Business, Management and Accounting › Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management › Ethics in Business and Education
- Keywords
- moral licensing, pro-environmental behavior, moral inference, observer evaluation, moral perception, environmental behavior, unethical behavior, self-perception
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.
