The DOI matches its Crossref record; 3 of the 3 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Aesthetics, Affect, and Cognition: Environmental Preference from an Evolutionary Perspective
Open accessAbstract
Scenes of the outdoor physical environment vary substantially in the extent to which they are preferred. Variables empirically found to predict preference can be analyzed both in terms of their information-processing implications and in terms of their evolutionary significance. Some of these predictors appear to require fairly extensive information processing, thus supporting the hypothesis that a rapid, unconscious type of cognition may precede certain affective judgments. Such ties between cognition and affect are understandable in the context of the proposed theoretical framework for environmental preference. This framework not only provides a coherent guide to research but also points to the pervasiveness and significance of aesthetics as a factor in human behavior and human experience.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Ecological Approach to Visual Perception
Bornstein, M. H., & Gibson, J. J. (1980) · The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism · doi:10.2307/429816 · Cited by 22,935
The magical number seven, plus or minus two: Some limits on our capacity for processing information.
Miller, G. A. (1956) · Psychological Review · doi:10.1037/h0043158 · Cited by 17,812
Feeling and thinking: Preferences need no inferences.
Zajonc, R. B. (1980) · American Psychologist · doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.2.151 · Cited by 8,094
Cited by
Servicescapes: The Impact of Physical Surroundings on Customers and Employees
Bitner, M. J. (1992) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.2307/1252042 · Cited by 7,271
Can a Retail Web Site Be Social?
Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007) · Journal of Marketing · doi:10.1509/jmkg.71.3.143 · Cited by 672
Nature is scary, disgusting, and uncomfortable
Bixler, R. D., & Floyd, M. F. (1997) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/001391659702900401 · Cited by 380
Health Benefits of Nature Experience: Psychological, Social and Cultural Processes
Hartig, T., van den Berg, A. E., Hagerhall, C. M., Tomalak, M., Bauer, N., Hansmann, R., Ojala, A., Syngollitou, E., Carrus, G., van Herzele, A., et al. (2011) · Forests, Trees and Human Health · doi:10.1007/978-90-481-9806-1_5 · Cited by 366
Mcintyre, N. E., Knowles-Yánez, K., & Hope, D. (2000) · Urban Ecosystems · doi:10.1023/a:1009540018553 · Cited by 281
Evolutionary Influence on Human Landscape Preference
Falk, J. H., & Balling, J. D. (2010) · Environment and Behavior · doi:10.1177/0013916509341244 · Cited by 242
The affective benefits of nature exposure
Bratman, G. N., Olvera‐Alvarez, H. A., & Gross, J. J. (2021) · Social and Personality Psychology Compass · doi:10.1111/spc3.12630 · Cited by 177
Richardson, M., & McEwan, K. (2018) · Frontiers in Psychology · doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01500 · Cited by 122
McMahan, E. A., Cloud, J. M., Josh, P., & Scott, M. (2016) · Ecopsychology · doi:10.1089/eco.2015.0068 · Cited by 15
Metadata
- Authors
- Kaplan, S.
- Venue
- Environment and Behavior
- Publisher
- SAGE Publications
- Published
- 1987-01
- Volume
- 19
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 3-32
- ISSN
- 0013-9165 (ISSN-L)
- 1552-390X
- OpenAlex
- W2077424253
- Cited by
- 715
- References
- 3
- FWCI
- 4.63
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.